VJPU.L vs. XLPS.L
VJPU.L (Vanguard FTSE Japan UCITS ETF USD Hedged Acc) and XLPS.L (Invesco Consumer Staples S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - VJPU.L is a Japan Equities fund tracking the FTSE Japan (USD Hedged), while XLPS.L is a Consumer Staples Equities fund tracking the S&P® Select Sector Capped 20% Consumer Staples Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, VJPU.L returned 29.41%/yr vs 8.35%/yr for XLPS.L. At a 0.15 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. VJPU.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.14%/yr for XLPS.L.
Performance
VJPU.L vs. XLPS.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VJPU.L achieves a 19.64% return, which is significantly higher than XLPS.L's 6.41% return.
VJPU.L
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- 6.90%
- YTD
- 19.64%
- 6M
- 21.88%
- 1Y
- 53.34%
- 3Y*
- 29.41%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XLPS.L
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- -2.80%
- YTD
- 6.41%
- 6M
- 6.85%
- 1Y
- 2.14%
- 3Y*
- 8.35%
- 5Y*
- 6.76%
- 10Y*
- 7.56%
VJPU.L vs. XLPS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VJPU.L Vanguard FTSE Japan UCITS ETF USD Hedged Acc | 19.64% | 31.52% | 23.80% | 35.64% | 1.68% |
XLPS.L Invesco Consumer Staples S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc | 6.41% | 3.99% | 14.25% | -0.26% | 4.64% |
Correlation
The correlation between VJPU.L and XLPS.L is -0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.00 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2022 | 0.15 |
The correlation between VJPU.L and XLPS.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.00 (1 year) to 0.15 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
VJPU.L vs. XLPS.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VJPU.L
XLPS.L
Industrials
Technology
Financial Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
-
Healthcare
-
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Energy
-
Industrials
VJPU.L
XLPS.L
Technology
VJPU.L
XLPS.L
Financial Services
VJPU.L
XLPS.L
-
Consumer Cyclical
VJPU.L
XLPS.L
Communication Services
VJPU.L
XLPS.L
-
Healthcare
VJPU.L
XLPS.L
-
Basic Materials
VJPU.L
XLPS.L
-
Consumer Defensive
VJPU.L
XLPS.L
-
Real Estate
VJPU.L
XLPS.L
-
Utilities
VJPU.L
XLPS.L
-
Energy
VJPU.L
XLPS.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VJPU.L vs. XLPS.L — Risk / Return Rank
VJPU.L
XLPS.L
VJPU.L vs. XLPS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE Japan UCITS ETF USD Hedged Acc (VJPU.L) and Invesco Consumer Staples S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc (XLPS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VJPU.L | XLPS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.66 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.61 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.52 | 1.04 | +0.48 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.55 | 0.23 | +5.32 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.73 | 0.48 | +19.25 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VJPU.L | XLPS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.82 | 0.16 | +2.66 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.51 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.56 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.48 | 0.81 | +0.67 |
Drawdowns
VJPU.L vs. XLPS.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VJPU.L drawdown since its inception was -25.40%, which is greater than XLPS.L's maximum drawdown of -23.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VJPU.L and XLPS.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VJPU.L | XLPS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.40% | -23.98% | -1.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.57% | -9.32% | -0.25% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.40% | -12.43% | -12.97% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -17.31% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -23.98% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.28% | -8.06% | +7.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.93% | -3.71% | +0.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.70% | 4.42% | -1.72% |
Volatility
VJPU.L vs. XLPS.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard FTSE Japan UCITS ETF USD Hedged Acc (VJPU.L) is 3.82%, while Invesco Consumer Staples S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc (XLPS.L) has a volatility of 5.56%. This indicates that VJPU.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLPS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VJPU.L | XLPS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.82% | 5.56% | -1.74% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.76% | 11.13% | +3.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.86% | 13.64% | +5.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.45% | 13.25% | +6.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.45% | 13.62% | +5.83% |
VJPU.L vs. XLPS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
VJPU.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than XLPS.L's 0.14% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VJPU.L vs. XLPS.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither VJPU.L nor XLPS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
VJPU.L and XLPS.L have a correlation of -0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XLPS.L is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XLPS.L is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for VJPU.L.
VJPU.L is categorized as Japan Equities, while XLPS.L is Consumer Staples Equities. VJPU.L tracks FTSE Japan (USD Hedged), while XLPS.L tracks S&P® Select Sector Capped 20% Consumer Staples Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for VJPU.L and 0.14% for XLPS.L.
Find the right allocation for VJPU.L and XLPS.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer