VJPU.L vs. XLFS.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

VJPU.L (Vanguard FTSE Japan UCITS ETF USD Hedged Acc) and XLFS.L (Invesco Financials S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - VJPU.L is a Japan Equities fund tracking the FTSE Japan (USD Hedged), while XLFS.L is a Financials Equities fund tracking the S&P® Select Sector Capped 20% Financials Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, VJPU.L returned 29.41%/yr vs 18.50%/yr for XLFS.L. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. VJPU.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.14%/yr for XLFS.L.

Performance

VJPU.L vs. XLFS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard FTSE Japan UCITS ETF USD Hedged Acc (VJPU.L) and Invesco Financials S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc (XLFS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VJPU.L achieves a 19.64% return, which is significantly higher than XLFS.L's -4.92% return.

VJPU.L

• 1D: -0.28%
• 1M: 6.90%
• YTD: 19.64%
• 6M: 21.88%
• 1Y: 53.34%
• 3Y*: 29.41%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

XLFS.L

• 1D: 3.23%
• 1M: 1.32%
• YTD: -4.92%
• 6M: -2.00%
• 1Y: 3.65%
• 3Y*: 18.50%
• 5Y*: 7.94%
• 10Y*: 12.18%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VJPU.L vs. XLFS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
VJPU.L Vanguard FTSE Japan UCITS ETF USD Hedged Acc	19.64%	31.52%	23.80%	35.64%	1.68%
XLFS.L Invesco Financials S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc	-4.92%	14.99%	30.15%	12.12%	10.38%

Correlation

The correlation between VJPU.L and XLFS.L is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.40
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.44
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2022	0.49

VJPU.L vs. XLFS.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	VJPU.L	XLFS.L
Industrials	26.6%	0.2%
Technology	17.4%	1.6%
Financial Services	15.9%	98.4%
Consumer Cyclical	12.8%	-
Communication Services	7.1%	-
Healthcare	5.9%	-
Basic Materials	4.3%	-
Consumer Defensive	4.2%	-
Real Estate	3.4%	-
Utilities	1.3%	-
Energy	1.0%	-

Return for Risk

VJPU.L vs. XLFS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VJPU.L

VJPU.L Risk / Return Rank: 88
VJPU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
VJPU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
VJPU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 86
VJPU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
VJPU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 89

XLFS.L

XLFS.L Risk / Return Rank: 12
XLFS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 13
XLFS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 12
XLFS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 12
XLFS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 12
XLFS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 12

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VJPU.L vs. XLFS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE Japan UCITS ETF USD Hedged Acc (VJPU.L) and Invesco Financials S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc (XLFS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	VJPU.L	XLFS.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.82	0.25	+2.57
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.93	0.47	+3.46
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.52	1.05	+0.47
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.55	0.26	+5.29
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	19.73	0.65	+19.08
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

VJPU.L vs. XLFS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VJPU.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.82, which is higher than the XLFS.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VJPU.L and XLFS.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	VJPU.L	XLFS.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.82	0.25	+2.57
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.42	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.58	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.48	0.55	+0.94

Drawdowns

VJPU.L vs. XLFS.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VJPU.L drawdown since its inception was -25.40%, smaller than the maximum XLFS.L drawdown of -42.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VJPU.L and XLFS.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	VJPU.L	XLFS.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-25.40%	-42.76%	+17.36%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.57%	-13.93%	+4.36%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-25.40%	-17.10%	-8.30%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-26.06%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-42.76%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.28%	-6.86%	+6.58%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.93%	-7.53%	+4.60%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.70%	5.57%	-2.87%

Volatility

VJPU.L vs. XLFS.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard FTSE Japan UCITS ETF USD Hedged Acc (VJPU.L) is 3.82%, while Invesco Financials S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc (XLFS.L) has a volatility of 4.54%. This indicates that VJPU.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLFS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VJPU.L	XLFS.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.82%	4.54%	-0.72%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.76%	11.06%	+3.70%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.86%	14.53%	+4.33%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.45%	19.00%	+0.45%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.45%	20.94%	-1.49%

VJPU.L vs. XLFS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

VJPU.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than XLFS.L's 0.14% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

VJPU.L vs. XLFS.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither VJPU.L nor XLFS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VJPU.L and XLFS.L in my portfolio?

VJPU.L and XLFS.L have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, VJPU.L or XLFS.L?

On fees, XLFS.L is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, VJPU.L or XLFS.L?

XLFS.L is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for VJPU.L.

What is the main difference between VJPU.L and XLFS.L?

VJPU.L is categorized as Japan Equities, while XLFS.L is Financials Equities. VJPU.L tracks FTSE Japan (USD Hedged), while XLFS.L tracks S&P® Select Sector Capped 20% Financials Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for VJPU.L and 0.14% for XLFS.L.