PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VJPU.L vs. PAJS.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VJPU.L vs. PAJS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard FTSE Japan UCITS ETF USD Hedged Acc (VJPU.L) and Invesco MSCI Japan ESG Climate Paris Aligned UCITS ETF Acc (PAJS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

VJPU.L is traded in USD, while PAJS.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the PAJS.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VJPU.L achieves a 21.58% return, which is significantly lower than PAJS.L's 10,660.15% return.


VJPU.L

1D
0.92%
1M
2.52%
YTD
21.58%
6M
22.12%
1Y
54.50%
3Y*
29.12%
5Y*
21.80%
10Y*

PAJS.L

1D
0.35%
1M
9,929.15%
YTD
10,660.15%
6M
10,670.08%
1Y
18.34%
3Y*
10.61%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VJPU.L vs. PAJS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
VJPU.L
Vanguard FTSE Japan UCITS ETF USD Hedged Acc
21.58%31.51%23.81%35.67%-2.33%2.76%
PAJS.L
Invesco MSCI Japan ESG Climate Paris Aligned UCITS ETF Acc
10,660.15%-98.78%-0.92%14.41%-22.90%-27.17%

Correlation

The correlation between VJPU.L and PAJS.L is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.69

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 6, 2021

0.69

The correlation between VJPU.L and PAJS.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VJPU.L vs. PAJS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VJPU.L
VJPU.L Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
VJPU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VJPU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
VJPU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
VJPU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
VJPU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

PAJS.L
PAJS.L Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
PAJS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PAJS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
PAJS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
PAJS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
PAJS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VJPU.L vs. PAJS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE Japan UCITS ETF USD Hedged Acc (VJPU.L) and Invesco MSCI Japan ESG Climate Paris Aligned UCITS ETF Acc (PAJS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VJPU.LPAJS.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.77

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-279.97

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

88.98

-87.48

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.67

0.19

+5.48

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

19.77

0.39

+19.38

VJPU.L vs. PAJS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VJPU.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.77, which is higher than the PAJS.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VJPU.L and PAJS.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VJPU.L vs. PAJS.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VJPU.L drawdown since its inception was -27.53%, smaller than the maximum PAJS.L drawdown of -99.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VJPU.L and PAJS.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VJPU.LPAJS.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.53%

-99.31%

+71.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.57%

-99.06%

+89.49%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.44%

-99.06%

+77.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.79%

-16.59%

+13.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.12%

-38.31%

+34.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.75%

48.79%

-46.04%

Volatility

VJPU.L vs. PAJS.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard FTSE Japan UCITS ETF USD Hedged Acc (VJPU.L) is 5.90%, while Invesco MSCI Japan ESG Climate Paris Aligned UCITS ETF Acc (PAJS.L) has a volatility of 460.91%. This indicates that VJPU.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PAJS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VJPU.LPAJS.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.90%

460.91%

-455.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.50%

1,306.88%

-1,291.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.56%

27,956.52%

-27,936.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.49%

13,244.00%

-13,225.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.59%

13,244.00%

-13,224.41%

VJPU.L vs. PAJS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

VJPU.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than PAJS.L's 0.19% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VJPU.L vs. PAJS.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither VJPU.L nor PAJS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


VJPU.L and PAJS.L have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, PAJS.L is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PAJS.L is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for VJPU.L.

VJPU.L tracks FTSE Japan (USD Hedged), while PAJS.L tracks TOPIX TR JPY. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for VJPU.L and 0.19% for PAJS.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VJPU.L and PAJS.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer