PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VJPU.L vs. LGJP.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VJPU.L vs. LGJP.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard FTSE Japan UCITS ETF USD Hedged Acc (VJPU.L) and L&G Japan Equity UCITS ETF (LGJP.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VJPU.L achieves a 21.68% return, which is significantly higher than LGJP.L's 15.08% return.


VJPU.L

1D
-1.00%
1M
1.01%
6M
14.24%
YTD
21.68%
1Y
52.01%
3Y*
29.40%
5Y*
22.28%
10Y*

LGJP.L

1D
-0.68%
1M
-0.39%
6M
9.30%
YTD
15.08%
1Y
33.92%
3Y*
17.92%
5Y*
9.51%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VJPU.L vs. LGJP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
VJPU.L
Vanguard FTSE Japan UCITS ETF USD Hedged Acc
21.68%31.51%23.81%35.67%-2.33%12.22%11.64%
LGJP.L
L&G Japan Equity UCITS ETF
15.08%25.67%8.35%20.25%-16.76%1.05%18.10%

Correlation

The correlation between VJPU.L and LGJP.L is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.83

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 31, 2020

0.83

The correlation between VJPU.L and LGJP.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VJPU.L vs. LGJP.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VJPU.L
VJPU.L Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
VJPU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VJPU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
VJPU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
VJPU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
VJPU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

LGJP.L
LGJP.L Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
LGJP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LGJP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
LGJP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
LGJP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
LGJP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VJPU.L vs. LGJP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE Japan UCITS ETF USD Hedged Acc (VJPU.L) and L&G Japan Equity UCITS ETF (LGJP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VJPU.LLGJP.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.29

+0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.41

2.53

+2.88

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.53

8.18

+10.35

VJPU.L vs. LGJP.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VJPU.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.60, which is higher than the LGJP.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VJPU.L and LGJP.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VJPU.L vs. LGJP.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VJPU.L drawdown since its inception was -27.53%, smaller than the maximum LGJP.L drawdown of -32.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VJPU.L and LGJP.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VJPU.LLGJP.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.53%

-32.19%

+4.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.57%

-13.20%

+3.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.44%

-14.30%

-7.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.44%

-32.19%

+10.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.71%

-3.27%

+0.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.11%

-7.57%

+3.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.80%

4.08%

-1.28%

Volatility

VJPU.L vs. LGJP.L - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard FTSE Japan UCITS ETF USD Hedged Acc (VJPU.L) and L&G Japan Equity UCITS ETF (LGJP.L) have volatilities of 6.34% and 6.42%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VJPU.LLGJP.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.34%

6.42%

-0.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.82%

17.61%

-1.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.88%

21.09%

-1.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.51%

18.15%

+0.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.59%

18.30%

+1.29%

VJPU.L vs. LGJP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

VJPU.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than LGJP.L's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VJPU.L vs. LGJP.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither VJPU.L nor LGJP.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


VJPU.L and LGJP.L have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, LGJP.L is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

LGJP.L is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for VJPU.L.

VJPU.L tracks FTSE Japan (USD Hedged), while LGJP.L tracks L&G Japan Equity UCITS ETF. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and L&G. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for VJPU.L and 0.10% for LGJP.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VJPU.L and LGJP.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer