VJPN.L vs. VHYG.L
VJPN.L (Vanguard FTSE Japan UCITS ETF Distributing) and VHYG.L (Vanguard FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VJPN.L is a Japan Equities fund tracking the TOPIX TR JPY, while VHYG.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI World High Dividend Yield NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, VJPN.L returned 10.73%/yr vs 11.68%/yr for VHYG.L. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VJPN.L charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for VHYG.L.
Performance
VJPN.L vs. VHYG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VJPN.L achieves a 16.32% return, which is significantly higher than VHYG.L's 11.62% return.
VJPN.L
- 1D
- 0.70%
- 1M
- 6.43%
- YTD
- 16.32%
- 6M
- 16.26%
- 1Y
- 35.06%
- 3Y*
- 16.39%
- 5Y*
- 10.73%
- 10Y*
- 11.10%
VHYG.L
- 1D
- 0.37%
- 1M
- 3.93%
- YTD
- 11.62%
- 6M
- 13.20%
- 1Y
- 28.51%
- 3Y*
- 15.99%
- 5Y*
- 11.68%
- 10Y*
- —
VJPN.L vs. VHYG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VJPN.L Vanguard FTSE Japan UCITS ETF Distributing | 16.32% | 18.86% | 9.05% | 14.00% | -5.70% | 2.26% | 12.84% | -1.02% |
VHYG.L Vanguard FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF | 11.62% | 18.36% | 10.99% | 5.01% | 6.20% | 19.28% | -3.61% | -18.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between VJPN.L and VHYG.L is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 25, 2019 | 0.63 |
The correlation between VJPN.L and VHYG.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.
VJPN.L vs. VHYG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VJPN.L
VHYG.L
Industrials
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Healthcare
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Utilities
Energy
Industrials
VJPN.L
VHYG.L
Technology
VJPN.L
VHYG.L
Financial Services
VJPN.L
VHYG.L
Consumer Cyclical
VJPN.L
VHYG.L
Communication Services
VJPN.L
VHYG.L
Healthcare
VJPN.L
VHYG.L
Basic Materials
VJPN.L
VHYG.L
Consumer Defensive
VJPN.L
VHYG.L
Real Estate
VJPN.L
VHYG.L
Utilities
VJPN.L
VHYG.L
Energy
VJPN.L
VHYG.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VJPN.L vs. VHYG.L — Risk / Return Rank
VJPN.L
VHYG.L
VJPN.L vs. VHYG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE Japan UCITS ETF Distributing (VJPN.L) and Vanguard FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF (VHYG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VJPN.L | VHYG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.19 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.36 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.58 | -0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.20 | 4.10 | -0.89 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.40 | 14.82 | -4.42 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VJPN.L | VHYG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.91 | 3.10 | -1.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 | 1.05 | -0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.70 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.62 | 0.42 | +0.21 |
Drawdowns
VJPN.L vs. VHYG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VJPN.L drawdown since its inception was -25.19%, smaller than the maximum VHYG.L drawdown of -39.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VJPN.L and VHYG.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VJPN.L | VHYG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.19% | -39.80% | +14.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.68% | -6.93% | -3.75% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.45% | -12.76% | -0.69% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.91% | -12.76% | -5.15% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -25.19% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.26% | -8.23% | +2.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.29% | 1.92% | +1.37% |
Volatility
VJPN.L vs. VHYG.L - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard FTSE Japan UCITS ETF Distributing (VJPN.L) has a higher volatility of 3.85% compared to Vanguard FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF (VHYG.L) at 2.27%. This indicates that VJPN.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VHYG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VJPN.L | VHYG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.85% | 2.27% | +1.58% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.62% | 7.12% | +7.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.91% | 9.16% | +8.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.50% | 11.12% | +4.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.90% | 15.91% | -0.01% |
VJPN.L vs. VHYG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
VJPN.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than VHYG.L's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
VJPN.L vs. VHYG.L - Dividend Comparison
VJPN.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.23%, while VHYG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VHYG.L Vanguard FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VJPN.L Vanguard FTSE Japan UCITS ETF Distributing | 2.23% | 2.54% | 2.47% | 2.39% | 2.64% | 2.31% | 2.14% | 2.36% | 2.55% | 1.94% | 2.04% | 2.08% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VJPN.L and VHYG.L have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VJPN.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VJPN.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for VHYG.L.
VJPN.L is categorized as Japan Equities, while VHYG.L is Global Equities. VJPN.L tracks TOPIX TR JPY, while VHYG.L tracks MSCI World High Dividend Yield NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for VJPN.L and 0.29% for VHYG.L.
Find the right allocation for VJPN.L and VHYG.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer