VJPN.L vs. JPNL.L
VJPN.L (Vanguard FTSE Japan UCITS ETF Distributing) and JPNL.L (Lyxor Japan (TOPIX) (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist EUR) are both Japan Equities funds tracking the TOPIX TR JPY, from Vanguard and Amundi respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VJPN.L returned 11.10%/yr vs 9.84%/yr for JPNL.L. A 0.80 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VJPN.L charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for JPNL.L.
Performance
VJPN.L vs. JPNL.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
VJPN.L is traded in GBP, while JPNL.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the JPNL.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VJPN.L achieves a 16.32% return, which is significantly higher than JPNL.L's 14.78% return. Over the past 10 years, VJPN.L has outperformed JPNL.L with an annualized return of 11.10%, while JPNL.L has yielded a comparatively lower 9.84% annualized return.
VJPN.L
- 1D
- 0.70%
- 1M
- 6.43%
- YTD
- 16.32%
- 6M
- 16.26%
- 1Y
- 35.06%
- 3Y*
- 16.39%
- 5Y*
- 10.73%
- 10Y*
- 11.10%
JPNL.L
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- 5.50%
- YTD
- 14.78%
- 6M
- 14.36%
- 1Y
- 31.62%
- 3Y*
- 14.93%
- 5Y*
- 9.61%
- 10Y*
- 9.84%
VJPN.L vs. JPNL.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VJPN.L Vanguard FTSE Japan UCITS ETF Distributing | 16.32% | 18.86% | 9.05% | 14.00% | -5.70% | 2.26% | 12.84% | 14.56% | -8.37% | 14.72% |
JPNL.L Lyxor Japan (TOPIX) (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist EUR | 14.78% | 17.96% | 7.74% | 12.66% | -5.98% | 1.37% | 8.23% | 15.36% | -9.97% | 14.63% |
Correlation
The correlation between VJPN.L and JPNL.L is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2013 | 0.80 |
The correlation between VJPN.L and JPNL.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.78 (5 years) to 0.95 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
VJPN.L vs. JPNL.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VJPN.L
JPNL.L
Industrials
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Healthcare
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Utilities
Energy
Industrials
VJPN.L
JPNL.L
Technology
VJPN.L
JPNL.L
Financial Services
VJPN.L
JPNL.L
Consumer Cyclical
VJPN.L
JPNL.L
Communication Services
VJPN.L
JPNL.L
Healthcare
VJPN.L
JPNL.L
Basic Materials
VJPN.L
JPNL.L
Consumer Defensive
VJPN.L
JPNL.L
Real Estate
VJPN.L
JPNL.L
Utilities
VJPN.L
JPNL.L
Energy
VJPN.L
JPNL.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VJPN.L vs. JPNL.L — Risk / Return Rank
VJPN.L
JPNL.L
VJPN.L vs. JPNL.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE Japan UCITS ETF Distributing (VJPN.L) and Lyxor Japan (TOPIX) (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist EUR (JPNL.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VJPN.L | JPNL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.06 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.37 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.20 | 3.26 | -0.05 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.40 | 9.96 | +0.45 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VJPN.L | JPNL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.91 | 1.93 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 | 0.74 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.70 | 0.71 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.62 | 0.73 | -0.10 |
Drawdowns
VJPN.L vs. JPNL.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VJPN.L drawdown since its inception was -25.19%, roughly equal to the maximum JPNL.L drawdown of -25.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VJPN.L and JPNL.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VJPN.L | JPNL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.19% | -25.42% | +0.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.68% | -10.63% | -0.05% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.45% | -13.44% | -0.01% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.91% | -18.53% | +0.62% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -25.19% | -25.42% | +0.23% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.35% | +0.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.26% | -5.36% | +0.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.29% | 3.37% | -0.08% |
Volatility
VJPN.L vs. JPNL.L - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard FTSE Japan UCITS ETF Distributing (VJPN.L) has a higher volatility of 3.85% compared to Lyxor Japan (TOPIX) (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist EUR (JPNL.L) at 3.61%. This indicates that VJPN.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JPNL.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VJPN.L | JPNL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.85% | 3.61% | +0.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.62% | 14.26% | +0.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.91% | 17.96% | -0.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.50% | 18.30% | -2.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.90% | 17.84% | -1.94% |
VJPN.L vs. JPNL.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
VJPN.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than JPNL.L's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
VJPN.L vs. JPNL.L - Dividend Comparison
VJPN.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.23%, more than JPNL.L's 0.62% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JPNL.L Lyxor Japan (TOPIX) (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist EUR | 0.62% | 0.71% | 0.74% | 1.23% | 1.83% | 1.37% | 1.14% | 1.98% | 1.84% | 1.43% | 1.96% | 1.77% |
VJPN.L Vanguard FTSE Japan UCITS ETF Distributing | 2.23% | 2.54% | 2.47% | 2.39% | 2.64% | 2.31% | 2.14% | 2.36% | 2.55% | 1.94% | 2.04% | 2.08% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, VJPN.L and JPNL.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, VJPN.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VJPN.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for JPNL.L.
Both ETFs track TOPIX TR JPY. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for VJPN.L and 0.45% for JPNL.L.
Find the right allocation for VJPN.L and JPNL.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer