VJPB.L vs. XCS4.DE

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

VJPB.L (Vanguard FTSE Japan UCITS ETF Accumulating) and XCS4.DE (Xtrackers MSCI Thailand UCITS ETF 1C) are both exchange-traded funds - VJPB.L is a Japan Equities fund tracking the TOPIX TR JPY, while XCS4.DE is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI Thailand. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, VJPB.L returned 10.09%/yr vs 5.16%/yr for XCS4.DE. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. VJPB.L charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for XCS4.DE.

Performance

VJPB.L vs. XCS4.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Vanguard FTSE Japan UCITS ETF Accumulating (VJPB.L) and Xtrackers MSCI Thailand UCITS ETF 1C (XCS4.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

VJPB.L is traded in GBP, while XCS4.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the XCS4.DE values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VJPB.L achieves a 16.20% return, which is significantly lower than XCS4.DE's 28.44% return.

VJPB.L

• 1D: -0.19%
• 1M: 6.30%
• YTD: 16.20%
• 6M: 15.61%
• 1Y: 33.91%
• 3Y*: 15.55%
• 5Y*: 10.09%
• 10Y*: —

XCS4.DE

• 1D: 0.85%
• 1M: 6.75%
• YTD: 28.44%
• 6M: 28.92%
• 1Y: 55.28%
• 3Y*: 7.36%
• 5Y*: 5.16%
• 10Y*: 5.56%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VJPB.L vs. XCS4.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
VJPB.L Vanguard FTSE Japan UCITS ETF Accumulating	16.20%	17.98%	8.49%	13.45%	-6.28%	1.76%	12.11%	-2.09%
XCS4.DE Xtrackers MSCI Thailand UCITS ETF 1C	28.44%	1.18%	2.81%	-17.21%	17.23%	-1.40%	-14.97%	-5.68%

Correlation

The correlation between VJPB.L and XCS4.DE is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.27
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.24
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.28
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2019	0.34

The correlation between VJPB.L and XCS4.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.24 (3 years) to 0.34 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

VJPB.L vs. XCS4.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VJPB.L

VJPB.L Risk / Return Rank: 60
VJPB.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
VJPB.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
VJPB.L Omega Ratio Rank: 61
VJPB.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
VJPB.L Martin Ratio Rank: 58

XCS4.DE

XCS4.DE Risk / Return Rank: 75
XCS4.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
XCS4.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
XCS4.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 67
XCS4.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
XCS4.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 77

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VJPB.L vs. XCS4.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE Japan UCITS ETF Accumulating (VJPB.L) and Xtrackers MSCI Thailand UCITS ETF 1C (XCS4.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	VJPB.L	XCS4.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.91	2.54	-0.63
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.70	3.36	-0.66
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	1.42	-0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.16	4.71	-1.54
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.23	14.45	-4.21
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

VJPB.L vs. XCS4.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VJPB.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.91, which is comparable to the XCS4.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VJPB.L and XCS4.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	VJPB.L	XCS4.DE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.91	2.54	-0.63
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.65	0.29	+0.36
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.28	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.53	0.23	+0.30

Drawdowns

VJPB.L vs. XCS4.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VJPB.L drawdown since its inception was -24.65%, smaller than the maximum XCS4.DE drawdown of -44.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VJPB.L and XCS4.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	VJPB.L	XCS4.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-24.65%	-44.38%	+19.73%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.67%	-11.69%	+1.02%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.60%	-27.79%	+14.19%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.32%	-36.20%	+17.88%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-44.38%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.19%	-3.97%	+3.78%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.34%	-17.22%	+11.88%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.31%	3.82%	-0.51%

Volatility

VJPB.L vs. XCS4.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard FTSE Japan UCITS ETF Accumulating (VJPB.L) is 3.88%, while Xtrackers MSCI Thailand UCITS ETF 1C (XCS4.DE) has a volatility of 5.94%. This indicates that VJPB.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XCS4.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VJPB.L	XCS4.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.88%	5.94%	-2.06%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.42%	16.95%	-2.53%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.70%	21.69%	-3.99%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.47%	17.63%	-2.16%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.69%	19.69%	-3.00%

VJPB.L vs. XCS4.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

VJPB.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than XCS4.DE's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

VJPB.L vs. XCS4.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither VJPB.L nor XCS4.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VJPB.L and XCS4.DE in my portfolio?

VJPB.L and XCS4.DE have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, VJPB.L or XCS4.DE?

On fees, VJPB.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, VJPB.L or XCS4.DE?

VJPB.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for XCS4.DE.

What is the main difference between VJPB.L and XCS4.DE?

VJPB.L is categorized as Japan Equities, while XCS4.DE is Asia Pacific Equities. VJPB.L tracks TOPIX TR JPY, while XCS4.DE tracks MSCI Thailand. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for VJPB.L and 0.50% for XCS4.DE.