PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VJPB.L vs. VWRL.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VJPB.L vs. VWRL.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Vanguard FTSE Japan UCITS ETF Accumulating (VJPB.L) and Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Distributing (VWRL.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VJPB.L achieves a 16.20% return, which is significantly higher than VWRL.L's 11.87% return.


VJPB.L

1D
-0.19%
1M
3.87%
YTD
16.20%
6M
15.77%
1Y
35.07%
3Y*
15.55%
5Y*
10.09%
10Y*

VWRL.L

1D
-0.06%
1M
3.77%
YTD
11.87%
6M
11.82%
1Y
29.76%
3Y*
17.97%
5Y*
12.45%
10Y*
13.48%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VJPB.L vs. VWRL.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
VJPB.L
Vanguard FTSE Japan UCITS ETF Accumulating
16.20%17.98%8.49%13.45%-6.28%1.76%12.11%-2.09%
VWRL.L
Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Distributing
11.87%13.99%19.59%15.61%-8.44%20.04%12.13%1.98%

Correlation

The correlation between VJPB.L and VWRL.L is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.59

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2019

0.66

The correlation between VJPB.L and VWRL.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.59 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.

VJPB.L vs. VWRL.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VJPB.L
VWRL.L

Industrials

26.6%
11.0%

Technology

17.4%
29.0%

Financial Services

15.9%
16.1%

Consumer Cyclical

12.8%
9.4%

Communication Services

7.1%
8.8%

Healthcare

5.9%
8.0%

Basic Materials

4.3%
3.8%

Consumer Defensive

4.2%
5.0%

Real Estate

3.4%
1.9%

Utilities

1.3%
2.7%

Energy

1.0%
4.2%

Industrials

VJPB.L
26.6%
VWRL.L
11.0%

Technology

VJPB.L
17.4%
VWRL.L
29.0%

Financial Services

VJPB.L
15.9%
VWRL.L
16.1%

Consumer Cyclical

VJPB.L
12.8%
VWRL.L
9.4%

Communication Services

VJPB.L
7.1%
VWRL.L
8.8%

Healthcare

VJPB.L
5.9%
VWRL.L
8.0%

Basic Materials

VJPB.L
4.3%
VWRL.L
3.8%

Consumer Defensive

VJPB.L
4.2%
VWRL.L
5.0%

Real Estate

VJPB.L
3.4%
VWRL.L
1.9%

Utilities

VJPB.L
1.3%
VWRL.L
2.7%

Energy

VJPB.L
1.0%
VWRL.L
4.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VJPB.L vs. VWRL.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VJPB.L
VJPB.L Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
VJPB.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VJPB.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
VJPB.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
VJPB.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
VJPB.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

VWRL.L
VWRL.L Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
VWRL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VWRL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
VWRL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
VWRL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
VWRL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VJPB.L vs. VWRL.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE Japan UCITS ETF Accumulating (VJPB.L) and Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Distributing (VWRL.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VJPB.LVWRL.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.97

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.55

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.16

4.20

-1.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.23

17.09

-6.86

VJPB.L vs. VWRL.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VJPB.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.91, which is lower than the VWRL.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VJPB.L and VWRL.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VJPB.LVWRL.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.91

2.88

-0.97

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

0.97

-0.32

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.53

0.95

-0.42

Drawdowns

VJPB.L vs. VWRL.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VJPB.L drawdown since its inception was -24.65%, roughly equal to the maximum VWRL.L drawdown of -24.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VJPB.L and VWRL.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VJPB.LVWRL.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.65%

-24.98%

+0.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.67%

-7.08%

-3.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.60%

-17.48%

+3.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.32%

-17.48%

-0.84%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.19%

-0.48%

+0.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.34%

-3.30%

-2.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.31%

1.74%

+1.57%

Volatility

VJPB.L vs. VWRL.L - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard FTSE Japan UCITS ETF Accumulating (VJPB.L) has a higher volatility of 3.88% compared to Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Distributing (VWRL.L) at 2.97%. This indicates that VJPB.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VWRL.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VJPB.LVWRL.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.88%

2.97%

+0.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.42%

7.64%

+6.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.70%

10.34%

+7.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.47%

12.86%

+2.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.69%

14.25%

+2.44%

VJPB.L vs. VWRL.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

VJPB.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than VWRL.L's 0.19% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VJPB.L vs. VWRL.L - Dividend Comparison

VJPB.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VWRL.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.24%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VJPB.L
Vanguard FTSE Japan UCITS ETF Accumulating
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VWRL.L
Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Distributing
1.24%1.39%1.49%1.72%2.03%1.45%1.58%1.95%2.22%1.90%1.85%2.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


VJPB.L and VWRL.L have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VJPB.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VJPB.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for VWRL.L.

VJPB.L is categorized as Japan Equities, while VWRL.L is Global Equities. VJPB.L tracks TOPIX TR JPY, while VWRL.L tracks FTSE All-World Index. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for VJPB.L and 0.19% for VWRL.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VJPB.L and VWRL.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer