VJPB.L vs. VNRG.L

Last updated Jun 14, 2026

VJPB.L (Vanguard FTSE Japan UCITS ETF Accumulating) and VNRG.L (Vanguard FTSE North America UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating) are both exchange-traded funds - VJPB.L is a Japan Equities fund tracking the TOPIX TR JPY, while VNRG.L is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 TR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, VJPB.L returned 9.91%/yr vs 13.98%/yr for VNRG.L. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VJPB.L charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for VNRG.L.

Performance

VJPB.L vs. VNRG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Vanguard FTSE Japan UCITS ETF Accumulating (VJPB.L) and Vanguard FTSE North America UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating (VNRG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VJPB.L achieves a 15.28% return, which is significantly higher than VNRG.L's 8.54% return.

VJPB.L

• 1D: 2.22%
• 1M: 0.63%
• YTD: 15.28%
• 6M: 14.35%
• 1Y: 33.40%
• 3Y*: 14.43%
• 5Y*: 9.91%
• 10Y*: —

VNRG.L

• 1D: 1.45%
• 1M: -0.06%
• YTD: 8.54%
• 6M: 8.94%
• 1Y: 26.20%
• 3Y*: 18.52%
• 5Y*: 13.98%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VJPB.L vs. VNRG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
VJPB.L Vanguard FTSE Japan UCITS ETF Accumulating	15.28%	17.99%	8.51%	13.43%	-6.28%	1.76%	12.11%	-20.91%
VNRG.L Vanguard FTSE North America UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating	8.54%	10.01%	27.28%	19.88%	-9.85%	28.98%	16.98%	1.69%

Correlation

The correlation between VJPB.L and VNRG.L is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.48
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.47
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.51
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2019	0.57

The correlation between VJPB.L and VNRG.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.47 to 0.57 - a consistent structural relationship.

VJPB.L vs. VNRG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	VJPB.L	VNRG.L
Industrials	26.6%	8.3%
Technology	17.4%	34.4%
Financial Services	15.9%	13.0%
Consumer Cyclical	12.8%	9.8%
Communication Services	7.1%	10.9%
Healthcare	5.9%	8.2%
Basic Materials	4.3%	2.4%
Consumer Defensive	4.2%	4.7%
Real Estate	3.4%	1.8%
Utilities	1.3%	2.3%
Energy	1.0%	4.3%

Return for Risk

VJPB.L vs. VNRG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VJPB.L

VJPB.L Risk / Return Rank: 65
VJPB.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
VJPB.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
VJPB.L Omega Ratio Rank: 65
VJPB.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
VJPB.L Martin Ratio Rank: 62

VNRG.L

VNRG.L Risk / Return Rank: 82
VNRG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
VNRG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
VNRG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 85
VNRG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
VNRG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 77

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VJPB.L vs. VNRG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE Japan UCITS ETF Accumulating (VJPB.L) and Vanguard FTSE North America UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating (VNRG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	VJPB.L	VNRG.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.82	2.40	-0.58
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.58	3.24	-0.65
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	1.45	-0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.07	3.58	-0.52
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.85	12.91	-3.06

VJPB.L vs. VNRG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VJPB.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.82, which is comparable to the VNRG.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VJPB.L and VNRG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

VJPB.L vs. VNRG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VJPB.L drawdown since its inception was -38.31%, which is greater than VNRG.L's maximum drawdown of -26.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VJPB.L and VNRG.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	VJPB.L	VNRG.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-38.31%	-26.12%	-12.19%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.66%	-7.15%	-3.51%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.86%	-20.91%	+1.05%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.86%	-20.91%	+1.05%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.98%	-1.80%	+0.82%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.10%	-3.68%	-8.42%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.32%	1.99%	+1.33%

Volatility

VJPB.L vs. VNRG.L - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard FTSE Japan UCITS ETF Accumulating (VJPB.L) has a higher volatility of 4.50% compared to Vanguard FTSE North America UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating (VNRG.L) at 3.57%. This indicates that VJPB.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VNRG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VJPB.L	VNRG.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.50%	3.57%	+0.93%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.75%	7.52%	+7.23%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.00%	10.69%	+7.31%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.77%	14.34%	+6.43%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.74%	16.21%	+5.53%

VJPB.L vs. VNRG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

VJPB.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than VNRG.L's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

VJPB.L vs. VNRG.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither VJPB.L nor VNRG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
VJPB.L Vanguard FTSE Japan UCITS ETF Accumulating	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
VNRG.L Vanguard FTSE North America UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating	0.00%	0.00%	0.27%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.97%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VJPB.L and VNRG.L in my portfolio?

VJPB.L and VNRG.L have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, VJPB.L or VNRG.L?

On fees, VNRG.L is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, VJPB.L or VNRG.L?

VNRG.L is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for VJPB.L.

What is the main difference between VJPB.L and VNRG.L?

VJPB.L is categorized as Japan Equities, while VNRG.L is Large Cap Blend Equities. VJPB.L tracks TOPIX TR JPY, while VNRG.L tracks Russell 1000 TR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for VJPB.L and 0.10% for VNRG.L.