VJPB.L vs. SUJA.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

VJPB.L (Vanguard FTSE Japan UCITS ETF Accumulating) and SUJA.L (iShares MSCI Japan SRI UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both Japan Equities funds tracking the TOPIX TR JPY, from Vanguard and iShares respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, VJPB.L returned 10.09%/yr vs 4.37%/yr for SUJA.L. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VJPB.L charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for SUJA.L.

Performance

VJPB.L vs. SUJA.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Vanguard FTSE Japan UCITS ETF Accumulating (VJPB.L) and iShares MSCI Japan SRI UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SUJA.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

VJPB.L is traded in GBP, while SUJA.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the SUJA.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VJPB.L achieves a 16.20% return, which is significantly higher than SUJA.L's 3.53% return.

VJPB.L

• 1D: -0.19%
• 1M: 6.30%
• YTD: 16.20%
• 6M: 15.61%
• 1Y: 33.91%
• 3Y*: 15.55%
• 5Y*: 10.09%
• 10Y*: —

SUJA.L

• 1D: -0.04%
• 1M: 7.15%
• YTD: 3.53%
• 6M: 2.52%
• 1Y: 13.20%
• 3Y*: 6.15%
• 5Y*: 4.37%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VJPB.L vs. SUJA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
VJPB.L Vanguard FTSE Japan UCITS ETF Accumulating	16.20%	17.98%	8.49%	13.45%	-6.28%	1.76%	12.11%	-2.09%
SUJA.L iShares MSCI Japan SRI UCITS ETF USD (Acc)	3.53%	11.08%	4.65%	7.41%	-8.78%	2.14%	13.75%	0.30%

Correlation

The correlation between VJPB.L and SUJA.L is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.87
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.92
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.94
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2019	0.94

The correlation between VJPB.L and SUJA.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

VJPB.L vs. SUJA.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	VJPB.L	SUJA.L
Industrials	26.6%	21.6%
Technology	17.4%	19.5%
Financial Services	15.9%	18.0%
Consumer Cyclical	12.8%	13.5%
Communication Services	7.1%	12.2%
Healthcare	5.9%	7.6%
Basic Materials	4.3%	1.9%
Consumer Defensive	4.2%	2.7%
Real Estate	3.4%	3.0%
Utilities	1.3%	-
Energy	1.0%	-

Return for Risk

VJPB.L vs. SUJA.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VJPB.L

VJPB.L Risk / Return Rank: 60
VJPB.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
VJPB.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
VJPB.L Omega Ratio Rank: 61
VJPB.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
VJPB.L Martin Ratio Rank: 58

SUJA.L

SUJA.L Risk / Return Rank: 24
SUJA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
SUJA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
SUJA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 22
SUJA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 27
SUJA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 26

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VJPB.L vs. SUJA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE Japan UCITS ETF Accumulating (VJPB.L) and iShares MSCI Japan SRI UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SUJA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	VJPB.L	SUJA.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.91	0.73	+1.18
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.70	1.16	+1.54
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	1.14	+0.22
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.16	1.24	+1.92
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.23	3.53	+6.71
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

VJPB.L vs. SUJA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VJPB.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.91, which is higher than the SUJA.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VJPB.L and SUJA.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	VJPB.L	SUJA.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.91	0.73	+1.18
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.65	0.28	+0.37
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.53	0.32	+0.21

Drawdowns

VJPB.L vs. SUJA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VJPB.L drawdown since its inception was -24.65%, roughly equal to the maximum SUJA.L drawdown of -23.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VJPB.L and SUJA.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	VJPB.L	SUJA.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-24.65%	-23.81%	-0.84%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.67%	-10.57%	-0.10%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.60%	-12.83%	-0.77%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.32%	-20.93%	+2.61%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.19%	-1.80%	+1.61%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.34%	-7.00%	+1.66%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.31%	3.73%	-0.42%

Volatility

VJPB.L vs. SUJA.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard FTSE Japan UCITS ETF Accumulating (VJPB.L) is 3.88%, while iShares MSCI Japan SRI UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SUJA.L) has a volatility of 4.72%. This indicates that VJPB.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SUJA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VJPB.L	SUJA.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.88%	4.72%	-0.84%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.42%	14.49%	-0.07%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.70%	18.02%	-0.32%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.47%	15.59%	-0.12%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.69%	17.03%	-0.34%

VJPB.L vs. SUJA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

VJPB.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than SUJA.L's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

VJPB.L vs. SUJA.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither VJPB.L nor SUJA.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VJPB.L and SUJA.L in my portfolio?

VJPB.L and SUJA.L have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, VJPB.L or SUJA.L?

On fees, VJPB.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, VJPB.L or SUJA.L?

VJPB.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for SUJA.L.

What is the main difference between VJPB.L and SUJA.L?

Both ETFs track TOPIX TR JPY. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for VJPB.L and 0.20% for SUJA.L.