PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VJPB.L vs. LGJP.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VJPB.L vs. LGJP.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Vanguard FTSE Japan UCITS ETF Accumulating (VJPB.L) and L&G Japan Equity UCITS ETF (LGJP.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

VJPB.L is traded in GBP, while LGJP.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the LGJP.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with VJPB.L having a 15.64% return and LGJP.L slightly lower at 15.40%.


VJPB.L

1D
-1.83%
1M
-0.98%
6M
9.77%
YTD
15.64%
1Y
34.32%
3Y*
16.75%
5Y*
9.91%
10Y*

LGJP.L

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.59%
6M
9.38%
YTD
15.40%
1Y
33.41%
3Y*
16.86%
5Y*
10.04%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VJPB.L vs. LGJP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
VJPB.L
Vanguard FTSE Japan UCITS ETF Accumulating
15.64%17.99%8.51%13.43%-6.28%1.76%12.11%-20.91%
LGJP.L
L&G Japan Equity UCITS ETF
15.40%16.72%10.25%14.24%-6.86%2.01%13.16%-1.47%

Correlation

The correlation between VJPB.L and LGJP.L is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2019

0.92

The correlation between VJPB.L and LGJP.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VJPB.L vs. LGJP.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VJPB.L
VJPB.L Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
VJPB.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VJPB.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
VJPB.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
VJPB.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
VJPB.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

LGJP.L
LGJP.L Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
LGJP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LGJP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
LGJP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
LGJP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
LGJP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VJPB.L vs. LGJP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE Japan UCITS ETF Accumulating (VJPB.L) and L&G Japan Equity UCITS ETF (LGJP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VJPB.LLGJP.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.31

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.20

3.08

+0.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.97

9.53

+0.44

VJPB.L vs. LGJP.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VJPB.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.82, which is comparable to the LGJP.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VJPB.L and LGJP.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VJPB.L vs. LGJP.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VJPB.L drawdown since its inception was -38.31%, which is greater than LGJP.L's maximum drawdown of -23.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VJPB.L and LGJP.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VJPB.LLGJP.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.31%

-23.10%

-15.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.66%

-10.76%

+0.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.86%

-13.79%

-6.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.86%

-18.15%

-1.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.08%

-4.57%

-0.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.98%

-4.98%

-7.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.43%

3.49%

-0.06%

Volatility

VJPB.L vs. LGJP.L - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard FTSE Japan UCITS ETF Accumulating (VJPB.L) and L&G Japan Equity UCITS ETF (LGJP.L) have volatilities of 6.59% and 6.43%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VJPB.LLGJP.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.59%

6.43%

+0.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.67%

16.88%

-1.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.83%

19.99%

-1.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.92%

16.80%

+4.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.74%

17.43%

+4.31%

VJPB.L vs. LGJP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

VJPB.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than LGJP.L's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VJPB.L vs. LGJP.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither VJPB.L nor LGJP.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, VJPB.L and LGJP.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, LGJP.L is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

LGJP.L is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for VJPB.L.

VJPB.L tracks TOPIX TR JPY, while LGJP.L tracks L&G Japan Equity UCITS ETF. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and L&G. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for VJPB.L and 0.10% for LGJP.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VJPB.L and LGJP.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer