VJPB.L vs. JARI.L
VJPB.L (Vanguard FTSE Japan UCITS ETF Accumulating) and JARI.L (Amundi Index MSCI Japan SRI PAB UCITS ETF DR (C)) are both Japan Equities funds tracking the TOPIX TR JPY, from Vanguard and Amundi respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, VJPB.L returned 10.09%/yr vs 1.63%/yr for JARI.L. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VJPB.L charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for JARI.L.
Performance
VJPB.L vs. JARI.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
VJPB.L is traded in GBP, while JARI.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the JARI.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VJPB.L achieves a 16.20% return, which is significantly higher than JARI.L's 2.58% return.
VJPB.L
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- 6.30%
- YTD
- 16.20%
- 6M
- 15.61%
- 1Y
- 33.91%
- 3Y*
- 15.55%
- 5Y*
- 10.09%
- 10Y*
- —
JARI.L
- 1D
- -0.40%
- 1M
- 4.23%
- YTD
- 2.58%
- 6M
- 1.49%
- 1Y
- 12.60%
- 3Y*
- 1.77%
- 5Y*
- 1.63%
- 10Y*
- —
VJPB.L vs. JARI.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VJPB.L Vanguard FTSE Japan UCITS ETF Accumulating | 16.20% | 17.98% | 8.49% | 13.45% | -6.28% | -2.72% |
JARI.L Amundi Index MSCI Japan SRI PAB UCITS ETF DR (C) | 2.58% | 10.15% | -2.37% | 5.00% | -10.79% | -1.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between VJPB.L and JARI.L is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 16, 2021 | 0.74 |
The correlation between VJPB.L and JARI.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.74 (all time) to 0.90 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
VJPB.L vs. JARI.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VJPB.L
JARI.L
Industrials
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Healthcare
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Utilities
-
Energy
-
Industrials
VJPB.L
JARI.L
Technology
VJPB.L
JARI.L
Financial Services
VJPB.L
JARI.L
Consumer Cyclical
VJPB.L
JARI.L
Communication Services
VJPB.L
JARI.L
Healthcare
VJPB.L
JARI.L
Basic Materials
VJPB.L
JARI.L
Consumer Defensive
VJPB.L
JARI.L
Real Estate
VJPB.L
JARI.L
Utilities
VJPB.L
JARI.L
-
Energy
VJPB.L
JARI.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VJPB.L vs. JARI.L — Risk / Return Rank
VJPB.L
JARI.L
VJPB.L vs. JARI.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE Japan UCITS ETF Accumulating (VJPB.L) and Amundi Index MSCI Japan SRI PAB UCITS ETF DR (C) (JARI.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VJPB.L | JARI.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.18 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.57 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.14 | +0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.16 | 1.20 | +1.97 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.23 | 3.31 | +6.93 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VJPB.L | JARI.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.91 | 0.72 | +1.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.65 | 0.12 | +0.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.53 | 0.02 | +0.51 |
Drawdowns
VJPB.L vs. JARI.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VJPB.L drawdown since its inception was -24.65%, which is greater than JARI.L's maximum drawdown of -22.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VJPB.L and JARI.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VJPB.L | JARI.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.65% | -22.78% | -1.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.67% | -10.47% | -0.20% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.60% | -14.89% | +1.29% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.32% | -22.78% | +4.46% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.19% | -4.56% | +4.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.34% | -12.30% | +6.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.31% | 3.80% | -0.49% |
Volatility
VJPB.L vs. JARI.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard FTSE Japan UCITS ETF Accumulating (VJPB.L) is 3.88%, while Amundi Index MSCI Japan SRI PAB UCITS ETF DR (C) (JARI.L) has a volatility of 4.18%. This indicates that VJPB.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JARI.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VJPB.L | JARI.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.88% | 4.18% | -0.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.42% | 13.96% | +0.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.70% | 17.35% | +0.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.47% | 17.35% | -1.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.69% | 17.73% | -1.04% |
VJPB.L vs. JARI.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
VJPB.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than JARI.L's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VJPB.L vs. JARI.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither VJPB.L nor JARI.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
VJPB.L and JARI.L have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VJPB.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VJPB.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for JARI.L.
Both ETFs track TOPIX TR JPY. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for VJPB.L and 0.18% for JARI.L.
Find the right allocation for VJPB.L and JARI.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer