VJPB.L vs. IJPA.L
VJPB.L (Vanguard FTSE Japan UCITS ETF Accumulating) and IJPA.L (iShares Core MSCI Japan IMI UCITS ETF USD Acc) are both Japan Equities funds - VJPB.L tracks the TOPIX TR JPY while IJPA.L tracks the MSCI Japan Investable Market Index (IMI). Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, VJPB.L returned 10.09%/yr vs 10.04%/yr for IJPA.L. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VJPB.L charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for IJPA.L.
Performance
VJPB.L vs. IJPA.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
VJPB.L is traded in GBP, while IJPA.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the IJPA.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with VJPB.L having a 16.20% return and IJPA.L slightly lower at 16.15%.
VJPB.L
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- 6.30%
- YTD
- 16.20%
- 6M
- 15.61%
- 1Y
- 33.91%
- 3Y*
- 15.55%
- 5Y*
- 10.09%
- 10Y*
- —
IJPA.L
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- 6.14%
- YTD
- 16.15%
- 6M
- 15.80%
- 1Y
- 33.76%
- 3Y*
- 15.71%
- 5Y*
- 10.04%
- 10Y*
- 10.12%
VJPB.L vs. IJPA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VJPB.L Vanguard FTSE Japan UCITS ETF Accumulating | 16.20% | 17.98% | 8.49% | 13.45% | -6.28% | 1.76% | 12.11% | -2.09% |
IJPA.L iShares Core MSCI Japan IMI UCITS ETF USD Acc | 16.15% | 18.21% | 8.48% | 13.38% | -6.19% | 1.11% | 11.60% | -2.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between VJPB.L and IJPA.L is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2019 | 0.94 |
The correlation between VJPB.L and IJPA.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
VJPB.L vs. IJPA.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VJPB.L
IJPA.L
Industrials
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Healthcare
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Utilities
Energy
Industrials
VJPB.L
IJPA.L
Technology
VJPB.L
IJPA.L
Financial Services
VJPB.L
IJPA.L
Consumer Cyclical
VJPB.L
IJPA.L
Communication Services
VJPB.L
IJPA.L
Healthcare
VJPB.L
IJPA.L
Basic Materials
VJPB.L
IJPA.L
Consumer Defensive
VJPB.L
IJPA.L
Real Estate
VJPB.L
IJPA.L
Utilities
VJPB.L
IJPA.L
Energy
VJPB.L
IJPA.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VJPB.L vs. IJPA.L — Risk / Return Rank
VJPB.L
IJPA.L
VJPB.L vs. IJPA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE Japan UCITS ETF Accumulating (VJPB.L) and iShares Core MSCI Japan IMI UCITS ETF USD Acc (IJPA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VJPB.L | IJPA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.34 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.16 | 3.16 | 0.00 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.23 | 10.36 | -0.13 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VJPB.L | IJPA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.91 | 1.81 | +0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.65 | 0.62 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.61 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.53 | 0.54 | -0.01 |
Drawdowns
VJPB.L vs. IJPA.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VJPB.L drawdown since its inception was -24.65%, roughly equal to the maximum IJPA.L drawdown of -25.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VJPB.L and IJPA.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VJPB.L | IJPA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.65% | -25.10% | +0.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.67% | -10.63% | -0.04% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.60% | -13.21% | -0.39% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.32% | -18.93% | +0.61% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -25.10% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.19% | -0.05% | -0.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.34% | -6.35% | +1.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.31% | 3.25% | +0.06% |
Volatility
VJPB.L vs. IJPA.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard FTSE Japan UCITS ETF Accumulating (VJPB.L) is 3.88%, while iShares Core MSCI Japan IMI UCITS ETF USD Acc (IJPA.L) has a volatility of 4.11%. This indicates that VJPB.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IJPA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VJPB.L | IJPA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.88% | 4.11% | -0.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.42% | 15.54% | -1.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.70% | 18.61% | -0.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.47% | 16.16% | -0.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.69% | 16.58% | +0.11% |
VJPB.L vs. IJPA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
VJPB.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than IJPA.L's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VJPB.L vs. IJPA.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither VJPB.L nor IJPA.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, VJPB.L and IJPA.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, IJPA.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IJPA.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for VJPB.L.
VJPB.L tracks TOPIX TR JPY, while IJPA.L tracks MSCI Japan Investable Market Index (IMI). They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for VJPB.L and 0.12% for IJPA.L.
Find the right allocation for VJPB.L and IJPA.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer