VJPB.L vs. EEJG.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

VJPB.L (Vanguard FTSE Japan UCITS ETF Accumulating) and EEJG.L (iShares MSCI Japan ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) are both Japan Equities funds tracking the TOPIX TR JPY, from Vanguard and iShares respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, VJPB.L returned 10.09%/yr vs 9.31%/yr for EEJG.L. With a 0.98 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. Both charge a 0.15% expense ratio.

Performance

VJPB.L vs. EEJG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Vanguard FTSE Japan UCITS ETF Accumulating (VJPB.L) and iShares MSCI Japan ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (EEJG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with VJPB.L having a 16.20% return and EEJG.L slightly lower at 15.84%.

VJPB.L

• 1D: -0.19%
• 1M: 6.30%
• YTD: 16.20%
• 6M: 15.61%
• 1Y: 33.91%
• 3Y*: 15.55%
• 5Y*: 10.09%
• 10Y*: —

EEJG.L

• 1D: -0.30%
• 1M: 5.45%
• YTD: 15.84%
• 6M: 15.60%
• 1Y: 34.38%
• 3Y*: 14.25%
• 5Y*: 9.31%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VJPB.L vs. EEJG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
VJPB.L Vanguard FTSE Japan UCITS ETF Accumulating	16.20%	17.98%	8.49%	13.45%	-6.28%	1.76%	18.69%
EEJG.L iShares MSCI Japan ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF USD (Dist)	15.84%	17.60%	6.43%	13.48%	-8.04%	1.83%	19.79%

Correlation

The correlation between VJPB.L and EEJG.L is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.98
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.98
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.98
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 29, 2020	0.98

The correlation between VJPB.L and EEJG.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

VJPB.L vs. EEJG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	VJPB.L	EEJG.L
Industrials	26.6%	22.9%
Technology	17.4%	22.2%
Financial Services	15.9%	21.1%
Consumer Cyclical	12.8%	10.4%
Communication Services	7.1%	8.4%
Healthcare	5.9%	8.5%
Basic Materials	4.3%	1.4%
Consumer Defensive	4.2%	0.8%
Real Estate	3.4%	4.0%
Utilities	1.3%	0.1%
Energy	1.0%	0.1%

Return for Risk

VJPB.L vs. EEJG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VJPB.L

VJPB.L Risk / Return Rank: 60
VJPB.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
VJPB.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
VJPB.L Omega Ratio Rank: 61
VJPB.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
VJPB.L Martin Ratio Rank: 58

EEJG.L

EEJG.L Risk / Return Rank: 57
EEJG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
EEJG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
EEJG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 58
EEJG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
EEJG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 57

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VJPB.L vs. EEJG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE Japan UCITS ETF Accumulating (VJPB.L) and iShares MSCI Japan ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (EEJG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	VJPB.L	EEJG.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.91	1.82	+0.09
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.70	2.62	+0.08
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	1.35	+0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.16	3.01	+0.16
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.23	9.84	+0.39
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

VJPB.L vs. EEJG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VJPB.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.91, which is comparable to the EEJG.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VJPB.L and EEJG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	VJPB.L	EEJG.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.91	1.82	+0.09
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.65	0.58	+0.07
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.53	0.66	-0.13

Drawdowns

VJPB.L vs. EEJG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VJPB.L drawdown since its inception was -24.65%, which is greater than EEJG.L's maximum drawdown of -19.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VJPB.L and EEJG.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	VJPB.L	EEJG.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-24.65%	-19.37%	-5.28%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.67%	-11.39%	+0.72%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.60%	-13.99%	+0.39%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.32%	-19.37%	+1.05%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.19%	-0.30%	+0.11%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.34%	-5.78%	+0.44%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.31%	3.48%	-0.17%

Volatility

VJPB.L vs. EEJG.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard FTSE Japan UCITS ETF Accumulating (VJPB.L) is 3.88%, while iShares MSCI Japan ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (EEJG.L) has a volatility of 4.29%. This indicates that VJPB.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EEJG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VJPB.L	EEJG.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.88%	4.29%	-0.41%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.42%	15.23%	-0.81%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.70%	18.80%	-1.10%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.47%	15.92%	-0.45%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.69%	15.99%	+0.70%

VJPB.L vs. EEJG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both VJPB.L and EEJG.L have an expense ratio of 0.15%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

VJPB.L vs. EEJG.L - Dividend Comparison

VJPB.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EEJG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.36%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
EEJG.L iShares MSCI Japan ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF USD (Dist)	1.36%	1.57%	1.81%	1.74%	2.10%	1.69%	1.64%
VJPB.L Vanguard FTSE Japan UCITS ETF Accumulating	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VJPB.L and EEJG.L in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.98, VJPB.L and EEJG.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, VJPB.L or EEJG.L?

Both ETFs have the same 0.15% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, VJPB.L or EEJG.L?

VJPB.L and EEJG.L have the same expense ratio: 0.15% per year.

What is the main difference between VJPB.L and EEJG.L?

Both ETFs track TOPIX TR JPY. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares.