VJPB.L vs. CUKX.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

VJPB.L (Vanguard FTSE Japan UCITS ETF Accumulating) and CUKX.L (iShares FTSE 100 UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VJPB.L is a Japan Equities fund tracking the TOPIX TR JPY, while CUKX.L is a fund fund tracking the FTSE 100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, VJPB.L returned 10.09%/yr vs 11.72%/yr for CUKX.L. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VJPB.L charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for CUKX.L.

Performance

VJPB.L vs. CUKX.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Vanguard FTSE Japan UCITS ETF Accumulating (VJPB.L) and iShares FTSE 100 UCITS ETF (CUKX.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

VJPB.L is traded in GBP, while CUKX.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the CUKX.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VJPB.L achieves a 16.20% return, which is significantly higher than CUKX.L's 5.86% return.

VJPB.L

• 1D: -0.19%
• 1M: 6.30%
• YTD: 16.20%
• 6M: 15.61%
• 1Y: 33.91%
• 3Y*: 15.55%
• 5Y*: 10.09%
• 10Y*: —

CUKX.L

• 1D: 0.28%
• 1M: 1.51%
• YTD: 5.86%
• 6M: 8.05%
• 1Y: 21.53%
• 3Y*: 14.63%
• 5Y*: 11.72%
• 10Y*: 9.06%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VJPB.L vs. CUKX.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
VJPB.L Vanguard FTSE Japan UCITS ETF Accumulating	16.20%	17.98%	8.49%	13.45%	-6.28%	1.76%	12.11%	-2.09%
CUKX.L iShares FTSE 100 UCITS ETF	5.86%	25.78%	9.30%	7.72%	4.97%	17.48%	-11.28%	3.22%

Correlation

The correlation between VJPB.L and CUKX.L is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.47
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.47
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.46
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2019	0.52

The correlation between VJPB.L and CUKX.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.46 to 0.52 - a consistent structural relationship.

VJPB.L vs. CUKX.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	VJPB.L	CUKX.L
Industrials	26.6%	13.7%
Technology	17.4%	0.8%
Financial Services	15.9%	25.0%
Consumer Cyclical	12.8%	5.0%
Communication Services	7.1%	2.6%
Healthcare	5.9%	13.6%
Basic Materials	4.3%	8.9%
Consumer Defensive	4.2%	13.2%
Real Estate	3.4%	0.9%
Utilities	1.3%	5.1%
Energy	1.0%	11.3%

Return for Risk

VJPB.L vs. CUKX.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VJPB.L

VJPB.L Risk / Return Rank: 60
VJPB.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
VJPB.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
VJPB.L Omega Ratio Rank: 61
VJPB.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
VJPB.L Martin Ratio Rank: 58

CUKX.L

CUKX.L Risk / Return Rank: 56
CUKX.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
CUKX.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
CUKX.L Omega Ratio Rank: 62
CUKX.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 50
CUKX.L Martin Ratio Rank: 50

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VJPB.L vs. CUKX.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE Japan UCITS ETF Accumulating (VJPB.L) and iShares FTSE 100 UCITS ETF (CUKX.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	VJPB.L	CUKX.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.91	1.97	-0.06
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.70	2.76	-0.06
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	1.37	-0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.16	2.41	+0.75
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.23	8.21	+2.03
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

VJPB.L vs. CUKX.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VJPB.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.91, which is comparable to the CUKX.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VJPB.L and CUKX.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	VJPB.L	CUKX.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.91	1.97	-0.06
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.65	0.92	-0.27
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.60	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.53	0.53	0.00

Drawdowns

VJPB.L vs. CUKX.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VJPB.L drawdown since its inception was -24.65%, smaller than the maximum CUKX.L drawdown of -34.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VJPB.L and CUKX.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	VJPB.L	CUKX.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-24.65%	-34.50%	+9.85%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.67%	-8.89%	-1.78%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.60%	-12.88%	-0.72%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.32%	-12.88%	-5.44%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-34.50%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.19%	-4.15%	+3.96%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.34%	-4.40%	-0.94%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.31%	2.62%	+0.69%

Volatility

VJPB.L vs. CUKX.L - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard FTSE Japan UCITS ETF Accumulating (VJPB.L) and iShares FTSE 100 UCITS ETF (CUKX.L) have volatilities of 3.88% and 4.08%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VJPB.L	CUKX.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.88%	4.08%	-0.20%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.42%	9.48%	+4.94%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.70%	10.87%	+6.83%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.47%	12.71%	+2.76%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.69%	15.08%	+1.61%

VJPB.L vs. CUKX.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

VJPB.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than CUKX.L's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

VJPB.L vs. CUKX.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither VJPB.L nor CUKX.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VJPB.L and CUKX.L in my portfolio?

VJPB.L and CUKX.L have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, VJPB.L or CUKX.L?

On fees, CUKX.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, VJPB.L or CUKX.L?

CUKX.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for VJPB.L.

What is the main difference between VJPB.L and CUKX.L?

VJPB.L tracks TOPIX TR JPY, while CUKX.L tracks FTSE 100 Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for VJPB.L and 0.07% for CUKX.L.