VIXY vs. GMAY
VIXY (ProShares VIX Short-Term Futures ETF) and GMAY (FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - May) are both exchange-traded funds - VIXY is a Volatility fund tracking the S&P 500 VIX Short-Term Futures Index, while GMAY is a Options Trading fund actively managed by FT Vest. VIXY is passively managed, while GMAY is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, VIXY returned -39.72%/yr vs 11.18%/yr for GMAY. At a correlation of -0.72, they often move in opposite directions. Both charge a 0.85% expense ratio.
Performance
VIXY vs. GMAY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VIXY achieves a -18.02% return, which is significantly lower than GMAY's 4.53% return.
VIXY
- 1D
- 3.34%
- 1M
- -9.75%
- 6M
- -16.02%
- YTD
- -18.02%
- 1Y
- -52.30%
- 3Y*
- -39.72%
- 5Y*
- -46.37%
- 10Y*
- -47.17%
GMAY
- 1D
- -0.43%
- 1M
- 0.80%
- 6M
- 3.98%
- YTD
- 4.53%
- 1Y
- 9.88%
- 3Y*
- 11.18%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VIXY vs. GMAY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
VIXY ProShares VIX Short-Term Futures ETF | -18.02% | -43.05% | -27.43% | -56.86% |
GMAY FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - May | 4.53% | 11.94% | 12.12% | 8.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between VIXY and GMAY is -0.81, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.81 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.74 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 22, 2023 | -0.72 |
The correlation between VIXY and GMAY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.81 to -0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VIXY vs. GMAY — Risk / Return Rank
VIXY
GMAY
VIXY vs. GMAY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares VIX Short-Term Futures ETF (VIXY) and FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - May (GMAY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VIXY | GMAY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.83 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.25 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.83 | 1.39 | -0.56 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.96 | 3.19 | -4.15 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.54 | 16.24 | -17.77 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VIXY vs. GMAY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VIXY drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, which is greater than GMAY's maximum drawdown of -11.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VIXY and GMAY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VIXY | GMAY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -100.00% | -11.75% | -88.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -54.62% | -3.11% | -51.51% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -81.19% | -11.75% | -69.44% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -96.44% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -99.84% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -100.00% | -0.43% | -99.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -92.21% | -0.72% | -91.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 34.02% | 0.61% | +33.41% |
Volatility
VIXY vs. GMAY - Volatility Comparison
ProShares VIX Short-Term Futures ETF (VIXY) has a higher volatility of 14.22% compared to FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - May (GMAY) at 2.09%. This indicates that VIXY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GMAY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VIXY | GMAY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.22% | 2.09% | +12.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 44.20% | 4.44% | +39.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 56.45% | 5.22% | +51.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 70.29% | 7.85% | +62.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 71.84% | 7.85% | +63.99% |
VIXY vs. GMAY - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both VIXY and GMAY have an expense ratio of 0.85%.
Dividends
VIXY vs. GMAY - Dividend Comparison
Neither VIXY nor GMAY has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
VIXY and GMAY have a correlation of -0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VIXY has higher volatility (14.22%) compared to GMAY (2.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VIXY dropped -100.00% vs GMAY's -11.75%.
On 3-year performance, GMAY leads with 11.18% vs -39.72% for VIXY. Both ETFs have the same 0.85% expense ratio. On volatility, GMAY has been the lower-risk option at 2.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, GMAY has performed better with a 11.18% return vs -39.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VIXY and GMAY have the same expense ratio: 0.85% per year.
VIXY and GMAY have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
VIXY is categorized as Volatility, while GMAY is Options Trading. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and FT Vest.
GMAY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.90 vs -0.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VIXY and GMAY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer