VIXY vs. GMAY
VIXY (ProShares VIX Short-Term Futures ETF) and GMAY (FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - May) are both exchange-traded funds - VIXY is a Volatility fund tracking the S&P 500 VIX Short-Term Futures Index, while GMAY is a Options Trading fund actively managed by FT Vest. VIXY is passively managed, while GMAY is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, VIXY returned -40.97%/yr vs 11.70%/yr for GMAY. At a correlation of -0.72, they often move in opposite directions. Both charge a 0.85% expense ratio.
Performance
VIXY vs. GMAY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VIXY achieves a -14.78% return, which is significantly lower than GMAY's 4.13% return.
VIXY
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- -14.08%
- YTD
- -14.78%
- 6M
- -16.35%
- 1Y
- -58.11%
- 3Y*
- -40.97%
- 5Y*
- -46.43%
- 10Y*
- -48.85%
GMAY
- 1D
- -0.13%
- 1M
- 0.26%
- YTD
- 4.13%
- 6M
- 4.24%
- 1Y
- 11.98%
- 3Y*
- 11.70%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VIXY vs. GMAY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
VIXY ProShares VIX Short-Term Futures ETF | -14.78% | -43.05% | -27.43% | -56.86% |
GMAY FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - May | 4.13% | 11.94% | 12.12% | 8.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between VIXY and GMAY is -0.80, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.80 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.73 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 22, 2023 | -0.72 |
The correlation between VIXY and GMAY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.80 to -0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VIXY vs. GMAY — Risk / Return Rank
VIXY
GMAY
VIXY vs. GMAY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares VIX Short-Term Futures ETF (VIXY) and FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - May (GMAY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VIXY | GMAY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.38 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -5.21 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.80 | 1.49 | -0.69 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -1.01 | 3.87 | -4.88 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.47 | 20.76 | -22.23 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VIXY vs. GMAY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VIXY drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, which is greater than GMAY's maximum drawdown of -11.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VIXY and GMAY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VIXY | GMAY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -100.00% | -11.75% | -88.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -57.79% | -3.11% | -54.68% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -79.94% | -11.75% | -68.19% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -96.20% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -99.88% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -100.00% | -0.62% | -99.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -92.19% | -0.73% | -91.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 40.39% | 0.58% | +39.81% |
Volatility
VIXY vs. GMAY - Volatility Comparison
ProShares VIX Short-Term Futures ETF (VIXY) has a higher volatility of 16.16% compared to FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - May (GMAY) at 2.43%. This indicates that VIXY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GMAY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VIXY | GMAY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.16% | 2.43% | +13.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 43.79% | 4.29% | +39.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 56.29% | 5.16% | +51.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 70.34% | 7.89% | +62.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 72.33% | 7.89% | +64.44% |
VIXY vs. GMAY - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both VIXY and GMAY have an expense ratio of 0.85%.
Dividends
VIXY vs. GMAY - Dividend Comparison
Neither VIXY nor GMAY has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
VIXY and GMAY have a correlation of -0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VIXY has higher volatility (16.16%) compared to GMAY (2.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VIXY dropped -100.00% vs GMAY's -11.75%.
On 3-year performance, GMAY leads with 11.70% vs -40.97% for VIXY. Both ETFs have the same 0.85% expense ratio. On volatility, GMAY has been the lower-risk option at 2.43%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, GMAY has performed better with a 11.70% return vs -40.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VIXY and GMAY have the same expense ratio: 0.85% per year.
VIXY and GMAY have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
VIXY is categorized as Volatility, while GMAY is Options Trading. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and FT Vest.
GMAY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs -1.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VIXY and GMAY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer