PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VITPX vs. MNNAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VITPX vs. MNNAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Institutional Total Stock Market Index Fund Institutional Plus Shares (VITPX) and Victory Munder Multi-Cap Fund (MNNAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VITPX achieves a 11.14% return, which is significantly lower than MNNAX's 14.66% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with VITPX having a 15.10% annualized return and MNNAX not far behind at 14.85%.


VITPX

1D
-0.76%
1M
4.07%
YTD
11.14%
6M
10.88%
1Y
28.14%
3Y*
22.61%
5Y*
13.02%
10Y*
15.10%

MNNAX

1D
-0.37%
1M
3.87%
YTD
14.66%
6M
14.54%
1Y
36.03%
3Y*
24.91%
5Y*
15.85%
10Y*
14.85%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VITPX vs. MNNAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VITPX
Vanguard Institutional Total Stock Market Index Fund Institutional Plus Shares
11.14%17.17%25.43%26.01%-19.48%25.76%20.95%30.87%-5.59%20.51%
MNNAX
Victory Munder Multi-Cap Fund
14.66%21.78%25.59%24.59%-19.03%35.03%11.18%28.33%-14.68%28.41%

Correlation

The correlation between VITPX and MNNAX is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 1, 2001

0.89

The correlation between VITPX and MNNAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VITPX vs. MNNAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VITPX
VITPX Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
VITPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VITPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
VITPX Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
VITPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
VITPX Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

MNNAX
MNNAX Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
MNNAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MNNAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
MNNAX Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
MNNAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
MNNAX Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VITPX vs. MNNAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Institutional Total Stock Market Index Fund Institutional Plus Shares (VITPX) and Victory Munder Multi-Cap Fund (MNNAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VITPXMNNAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.46

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.17

3.75

-0.58

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.64

17.63

-2.99

VITPX vs. MNNAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VITPX Sharpe Ratio is 2.32, which is comparable to the MNNAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VITPX and MNNAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VITPXMNNAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.32

2.62

-0.30

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

0.80

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

0.73

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

0.38

+0.13

Drawdowns

VITPX vs. MNNAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VITPX drawdown since its inception was -55.28%, smaller than the maximum MNNAX drawdown of -92.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VITPX and MNNAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VITPXMNNAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.28%

-92.93%

+37.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.92%

-9.72%

+0.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.35%

-19.06%

-0.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.31%

-30.29%

+4.98%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.99%

-38.01%

+3.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.76%

-0.37%

-0.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.02%

-50.74%

+42.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.93%

2.06%

-0.13%

Volatility

VITPX vs. MNNAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Institutional Total Stock Market Index Fund Institutional Plus Shares (VITPX) is 3.05%, while Victory Munder Multi-Cap Fund (MNNAX) has a volatility of 3.62%. This indicates that VITPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MNNAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VITPXMNNAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.05%

3.62%

-0.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.20%

10.85%

-1.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.22%

13.94%

-1.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.35%

19.99%

-2.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.41%

20.31%

-1.90%

VITPX vs. MNNAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

VITPX has a 0.02% expense ratio, which is lower than MNNAX's 1.28% expense ratio.


Dividends

VITPX vs. MNNAX - Dividend Comparison

VITPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.26%, less than MNNAX's 12.54% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MNNAX
Victory Munder Multi-Cap Fund
12.54%14.38%8.72%4.65%15.37%10.88%0.07%2.76%19.25%5.28%0.00%21.54%
VITPX
Vanguard Institutional Total Stock Market Index Fund Institutional Plus Shares
2.26%2.64%4.14%2.41%6.48%5.38%11.57%2.91%3.93%1.90%2.80%2.30%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, VITPX and MNNAX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

MNNAX has higher volatility (3.62%) compared to VITPX (3.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VITPX dropped -55.28% vs MNNAX's -92.93%.

MNNAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.62 vs 2.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VITPX and MNNAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer