PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VITNX vs. TBCIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VITNX vs. TBCIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Institutional Total Stock Market Index Fund Institutional Shares (VITNX) and T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth Fund I Class (TBCIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VITNX achieves a 11.98% return, which is significantly higher than TBCIX's 5.54% return. Over the past 10 years, VITNX has underperformed TBCIX with an annualized return of 15.18%, while TBCIX has yielded a comparatively higher 17.93% annualized return.


VITNX

1D
0.24%
1M
5.76%
YTD
11.98%
6M
11.89%
1Y
29.13%
3Y*
22.91%
5Y*
13.37%
10Y*
15.18%

TBCIX

1D
-0.69%
1M
5.17%
YTD
5.54%
6M
5.71%
1Y
22.23%
3Y*
29.00%
5Y*
14.09%
10Y*
17.93%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VITNX vs. TBCIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VITNX
Vanguard Institutional Total Stock Market Index Fund Institutional Shares
11.98%17.16%25.42%26.01%-19.47%25.76%20.95%30.86%-5.60%20.52%
TBCIX
T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth Fund I Class
5.54%18.94%48.73%49.61%-38.48%18.30%34.90%30.30%2.13%36.68%

Correlation

The correlation between VITNX and TBCIX is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.84

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016

0.88

The correlation between VITNX and TBCIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VITNX vs. TBCIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VITNX
VITNX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
VITNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VITNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
VITNX Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
VITNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
VITNX Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

TBCIX
TBCIX Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
TBCIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TBCIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
TBCIX Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
TBCIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
TBCIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VITNX vs. TBCIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Institutional Total Stock Market Index Fund Institutional Shares (VITNX) and T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth Fund I Class (TBCIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VITNXTBCIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.26

+0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.38

1.36

+2.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.59

4.57

+11.02

VITNX vs. TBCIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VITNX Sharpe Ratio is 2.47, which is higher than the TBCIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VITNX and TBCIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VITNXTBCIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.47

1.47

+1.00

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

0.59

+0.18

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

0.79

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.53

0.76

-0.23

Drawdowns

VITNX vs. TBCIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VITNX drawdown since its inception was -55.32%, which is greater than TBCIX's maximum drawdown of -43.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VITNX and TBCIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VITNXTBCIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.32%

-43.26%

-12.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.92%

-16.96%

+8.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.36%

-23.06%

+3.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.32%

-43.26%

+17.94%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.99%

-43.26%

+8.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.69%

+0.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.35%

-8.07%

+0.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.93%

5.01%

-3.08%

Volatility

VITNX vs. TBCIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Institutional Total Stock Market Index Fund Institutional Shares (VITNX) is 2.94%, while T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth Fund I Class (TBCIX) has a volatility of 3.57%. This indicates that VITNX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TBCIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VITNXTBCIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.94%

3.57%

-0.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.19%

12.01%

-2.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.19%

15.64%

-3.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.35%

23.91%

-6.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.42%

22.76%

-4.34%

VITNX vs. TBCIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

VITNX has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than TBCIX's 0.56% expense ratio.


Dividends

VITNX vs. TBCIX - Dividend Comparison

VITNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.23%, less than TBCIX's 4.93% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
TBCIX
T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth Fund I Class
4.93%5.20%18.28%3.47%5.84%10.03%1.18%0.59%2.50%3.05%0.81%0.00%
VITNX
Vanguard Institutional Total Stock Market Index Fund Institutional Shares
2.23%2.63%4.14%2.41%6.48%5.37%11.56%2.90%3.92%1.89%2.78%2.28%

Frequently Asked Questions


VITNX and TBCIX have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TBCIX has higher volatility (3.57%) compared to VITNX (2.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VITNX dropped -55.32% vs TBCIX's -43.26%.

VITNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.47 vs 1.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VITNX and TBCIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer