VIMSX vs. ATGAX
VIMSX (Vanguard Mid Cap Index Fund) and ATGAX (Aquila Opportunity Growth Fund) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds. With a 1.00 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. VIMSX charges 0.17%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for ATGAX.
Performance
VIMSX vs. ATGAX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
VIMSX
- 1D
- 0.90%
- 1M
- 3.66%
- YTD
- 10.48%
- 6M
- 10.13%
- 1Y
- 18.59%
- 3Y*
- 16.52%
- 5Y*
- 7.88%
- 10Y*
- 11.40%
ATGAX
- 1D
- 1.15%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VIMSX vs. ATGAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
VIMSX Vanguard Mid Cap Index Fund | 1.39% |
ATGAX Aquila Opportunity Growth Fund | 2.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between VIMSX and ATGAX is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2026 | 1.00 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VIMSX vs. ATGAX — Risk / Return Rank
VIMSX
ATGAX
VIMSX vs. ATGAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Mid Cap Index Fund (VIMSX) and Aquila Opportunity Growth Fund (ATGAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VIMSX | ATGAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.42 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.19 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VIMSX | ATGAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.60 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.60 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.48 | 58.33 | -57.85 |
Drawdowns
VIMSX vs. ATGAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VIMSX drawdown since its inception was -58.96%, which is greater than ATGAX's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VIMSX and ATGAX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VIMSX | ATGAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.96% | 0.00% | -58.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.14% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.31% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.63% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.29% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.07% | 0.00% | -8.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.14% | — | — |
Volatility
VIMSX vs. ATGAX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VIMSX | ATGAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.97% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.28% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.30% | 9.26% | +3.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.64% | 9.26% | +8.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.93% | 9.26% | +9.67% |
VIMSX vs. ATGAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
VIMSX has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is lower than ATGAX's 1.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
VIMSX vs. ATGAX - Dividend Comparison
VIMSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.23%, while ATGAX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ATGAX Aquila Opportunity Growth Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VIMSX Vanguard Mid Cap Index Fund | 1.23% | 1.03% | 1.37% | 1.39% | 1.46% | 1.00% | 1.34% | 1.37% | 1.68% | 1.24% | 1.34% | 1.33% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 1.00, VIMSX and ATGAX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
Find the right allocation for VIMSX and ATGAX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer