VIMCX vs. PXSGX
VIMCX (Virtus KAR Mid-Cap Core Fund) and PXSGX (Virtus KAR Small-Cap Growth Fund) are both mutual funds - VIMCX is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Virtus, while PXSGX is a Small Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Virtus. Over the past 10 years, VIMCX returned 10.48%/yr vs 10.28%/yr for PXSGX. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VIMCX charges 0.95%/yr vs 1.07%/yr for PXSGX.
Performance
VIMCX vs. PXSGX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VIMCX achieves a 0.99% return, which is significantly higher than PXSGX's -2.14% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with VIMCX having a 10.48% annualized return and PXSGX not far behind at 10.28%.
VIMCX
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.62%
- 6M
- -3.38%
- YTD
- 0.99%
- 1Y
- -2.40%
- 3Y*
- 4.61%
- 5Y*
- 2.70%
- 10Y*
- 10.48%
PXSGX
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- 5.42%
- 6M
- -7.54%
- YTD
- -2.14%
- 1Y
- -18.26%
- 3Y*
- -2.07%
- 5Y*
- -4.60%
- 10Y*
- 10.28%
VIMCX vs. PXSGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VIMCX Virtus KAR Mid-Cap Core Fund | 0.99% | 0.72% | 5.20% | 22.64% | -19.75% | 25.28% | 26.11% | 31.74% | -4.18% | 24.95% |
PXSGX Virtus KAR Small-Cap Growth Fund | -2.14% | -22.97% | 21.11% | 20.27% | -30.04% | 4.47% | 43.46% | 40.26% | 9.05% | 36.99% |
Correlation
The correlation between VIMCX and PXSGX is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2009 | 0.84 |
The correlation between VIMCX and PXSGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VIMCX vs. PXSGX — Risk / Return Rank
VIMCX
PXSGX
VIMCX vs. PXSGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus KAR Mid-Cap Core Fund (VIMCX) and Virtus KAR Small-Cap Growth Fund (PXSGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VIMCX | PXSGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.80 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.24 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.99 | 0.86 | +0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.20 | -0.64 | +0.43 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.50 | -1.04 | +0.54 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VIMCX vs. PXSGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VIMCX drawdown since its inception was -33.92%, smaller than the maximum PXSGX drawdown of -53.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VIMCX and PXSGX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VIMCX | PXSGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.92% | -53.72% | +19.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.14% | -28.07% | +15.93% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.32% | -42.49% | +22.17% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.42% | -42.49% | +14.07% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.92% | -42.49% | +8.57% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.59% | -35.43% | +29.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.89% | -11.89% | +7.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.93% | 17.16% | -12.23% |
Volatility
VIMCX vs. PXSGX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Virtus KAR Mid-Cap Core Fund (VIMCX) is 4.72%, while Virtus KAR Small-Cap Growth Fund (PXSGX) has a volatility of 5.26%. This indicates that VIMCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PXSGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VIMCX | PXSGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.72% | 5.26% | -0.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.60% | 13.16% | -0.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.33% | 18.82% | -2.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.22% | 24.85% | -6.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.65% | 22.58% | -3.93% |
VIMCX vs. PXSGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
VIMCX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than PXSGX's 1.07% expense ratio.
Dividends
VIMCX vs. PXSGX - Dividend Comparison
VIMCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.37%, less than PXSGX's 48.96% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PXSGX Virtus KAR Small-Cap Growth Fund | 48.96% | 47.91% | 20.72% | 5.31% | 17.32% | 14.31% | 9.64% | 1.52% | 2.31% | 0.00% | 2.69% | 2.99% |
VIMCX Virtus KAR Mid-Cap Core Fund | 4.37% | 4.41% | 0.00% | 2.36% | 0.23% | 1.58% | 0.67% | 0.94% | 0.77% | 0.29% | 0.00% | 0.63% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VIMCX and PXSGX have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PXSGX has higher volatility (5.26%) compared to VIMCX (4.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VIMCX dropped -33.92% vs PXSGX's -53.72%.
VIMCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.15 vs -0.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VIMCX and PXSGX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer