VIMCX vs. PXSGX
VIMCX (Virtus KAR Mid-Cap Core Fund) and PXSGX (Virtus KAR Small-Cap Growth Fund) are both mutual funds - VIMCX is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Virtus, while PXSGX is a Small Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Virtus. Over the past 10 years, VIMCX returned 10.81%/yr vs 10.18%/yr for PXSGX. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VIMCX charges 0.95%/yr vs 1.07%/yr for PXSGX.
Performance
VIMCX vs. PXSGX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VIMCX achieves a -1.53% return, which is significantly higher than PXSGX's -8.03% return. Over the past 10 years, VIMCX has outperformed PXSGX with an annualized return of 10.81%, while PXSGX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.18% annualized return.
VIMCX
- 1D
- -1.31%
- 1M
- -0.37%
- YTD
- -1.53%
- 6M
- -3.42%
- 1Y
- -2.54%
- 3Y*
- 5.59%
- 5Y*
- 2.33%
- 10Y*
- 10.81%
PXSGX
- 1D
- 0.38%
- 1M
- 0.44%
- YTD
- -8.03%
- 6M
- -9.86%
- 1Y
- -23.01%
- 3Y*
- -1.95%
- 5Y*
- -6.04%
- 10Y*
- 10.18%
VIMCX vs. PXSGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VIMCX Virtus KAR Mid-Cap Core Fund | -1.53% | 0.72% | 5.20% | 22.64% | -19.75% | 25.28% | 26.11% | 31.74% | -4.18% | 24.95% |
PXSGX Virtus KAR Small-Cap Growth Fund | -8.03% | -22.97% | 21.11% | 20.27% | -30.04% | 4.47% | 43.46% | 40.26% | 9.05% | 36.99% |
Correlation
The correlation between VIMCX and PXSGX is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2009 | 0.84 |
The correlation between VIMCX and PXSGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VIMCX vs. PXSGX — Risk / Return Rank
VIMCX
PXSGX
VIMCX vs. PXSGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus KAR Mid-Cap Core Fund (VIMCX) and Virtus KAR Small-Cap Growth Fund (PXSGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VIMCX | PXSGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.70 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 0.82 | +0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.13 | -0.78 | +0.65 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.33 | -1.30 | +0.98 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VIMCX vs. PXSGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VIMCX drawdown since its inception was -33.92%, smaller than the maximum PXSGX drawdown of -53.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VIMCX and PXSGX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VIMCX | PXSGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.92% | -53.72% | +19.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.14% | -28.37% | +16.23% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.32% | -42.49% | +22.17% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.42% | -42.49% | +14.07% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.92% | -42.49% | +8.57% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.95% | -39.32% | +31.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.89% | -11.83% | +6.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.78% | 16.85% | -12.07% |
Volatility
VIMCX vs. PXSGX - Volatility Comparison
Virtus KAR Mid-Cap Core Fund (VIMCX) has a higher volatility of 5.50% compared to Virtus KAR Small-Cap Growth Fund (PXSGX) at 4.35%. This indicates that VIMCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PXSGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VIMCX | PXSGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.50% | 4.35% | +1.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.72% | 13.26% | -0.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.29% | 18.66% | -2.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.21% | 24.80% | -6.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.69% | 22.59% | -3.90% |
VIMCX vs. PXSGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
VIMCX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than PXSGX's 1.07% expense ratio.
Dividends
VIMCX vs. PXSGX - Dividend Comparison
VIMCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.48%, less than PXSGX's 52.10% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PXSGX Virtus KAR Small-Cap Growth Fund | 52.10% | 47.91% | 20.72% | 5.31% | 17.32% | 14.31% | 9.64% | 1.52% | 2.31% | 0.00% | 2.69% | 2.99% |
VIMCX Virtus KAR Mid-Cap Core Fund | 4.48% | 4.41% | 0.00% | 2.36% | 0.23% | 1.58% | 0.67% | 0.94% | 0.77% | 0.29% | 0.00% | 0.63% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VIMCX and PXSGX have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VIMCX has higher volatility (5.50%) compared to PXSGX (4.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VIMCX dropped -33.92% vs PXSGX's -53.72%.
VIMCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.10 vs -1.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VIMCX and PXSGX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer