VIMCX vs. NFJ
VIMCX (Virtus KAR Mid-Cap Core Fund) and NFJ (Virtus Dividend, Interest and Premium Strategy Fund) are both mutual funds - VIMCX is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Virtus, while NFJ is a Dividend fund managed by Virtus. Over the past 10 years, VIMCX returned 10.81%/yr vs 10.81%/yr for NFJ. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VIMCX charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.02%/yr for NFJ.
Performance
VIMCX vs. NFJ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VIMCX achieves a -1.53% return, which is significantly lower than NFJ's 21.43% return. Over a longer period, both investments have demonstrated similar performance, with their 10-year annualized returns being quite close: VIMCX at 10.81% and NFJ at 10.81%.
VIMCX
- 1D
- -1.31%
- 1M
- -0.37%
- YTD
- -1.53%
- 6M
- -3.42%
- 1Y
- -2.54%
- 3Y*
- 5.59%
- 5Y*
- 2.33%
- 10Y*
- 10.81%
NFJ
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- 4.85%
- YTD
- 21.43%
- 6M
- 21.62%
- 1Y
- 33.98%
- 3Y*
- 18.36%
- 5Y*
- 8.69%
- 10Y*
- 10.81%
VIMCX vs. NFJ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VIMCX Virtus KAR Mid-Cap Core Fund | -1.53% | 0.72% | 5.20% | 22.64% | -19.75% | 25.28% | 26.11% | 31.74% | -4.18% | 24.95% |
NFJ Virtus Dividend, Interest and Premium Strategy Fund | 21.43% | 12.40% | 9.96% | 21.30% | -23.90% | 26.75% | 12.42% | 30.88% | -11.97% | 12.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between VIMCX and NFJ is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2009 | 0.71 |
The correlation between VIMCX and NFJ shifts across timeframes, from 0.61 (1 year) to 0.75 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VIMCX vs. NFJ — Risk / Return Rank
VIMCX
NFJ
VIMCX vs. NFJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus KAR Mid-Cap Core Fund (VIMCX) and Virtus Dividend, Interest and Premium Strategy Fund (NFJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VIMCX | NFJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.62 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.67 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.44 | -0.44 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.13 | 3.98 | -4.11 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.33 | 13.52 | -13.85 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VIMCX vs. NFJ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VIMCX drawdown since its inception was -33.92%, smaller than the maximum NFJ drawdown of -57.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VIMCX and NFJ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VIMCX | NFJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.92% | -57.92% | +24.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.14% | -8.57% | -3.57% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.32% | -17.04% | -3.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.42% | -30.57% | +2.15% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.92% | -40.96% | +7.04% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.95% | -1.96% | -5.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.89% | -10.77% | +5.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.78% | 2.52% | +2.26% |
Volatility
VIMCX vs. NFJ - Volatility Comparison
Virtus KAR Mid-Cap Core Fund (VIMCX) has a higher volatility of 5.50% compared to Virtus Dividend, Interest and Premium Strategy Fund (NFJ) at 5.01%. This indicates that VIMCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NFJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VIMCX | NFJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.50% | 5.01% | +0.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.72% | 10.67% | +2.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.29% | 13.54% | +2.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.21% | 17.21% | +1.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.69% | 18.69% | 0.00% |
VIMCX vs. NFJ - Expense Ratio Comparison
VIMCX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than NFJ's 0.02% expense ratio.
Dividends
VIMCX vs. NFJ - Dividend Comparison
VIMCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.48%, less than NFJ's 8.15% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NFJ Virtus Dividend, Interest and Premium Strategy Fund | 8.15% | 9.46% | 9.26% | 7.78% | 8.83% | 5.60% | 6.69% | 6.92% | 8.43% | 8.62% | 9.52% | 13.32% |
VIMCX Virtus KAR Mid-Cap Core Fund | 4.48% | 4.41% | 0.00% | 2.36% | 0.23% | 1.58% | 0.67% | 0.94% | 0.77% | 0.29% | 0.00% | 0.63% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VIMCX and NFJ have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VIMCX has higher volatility (5.50%) compared to NFJ (5.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VIMCX dropped -33.92% vs NFJ's -57.92%.
NFJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs -0.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VIMCX and NFJ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer