PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VIMCX vs. EDF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VIMCX vs. EDF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Virtus KAR Mid-Cap Core Fund (VIMCX) and Virtus Stone Harbor Emerging Markets Income Fund (EDF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VIMCX achieves a -0.89% return, which is significantly lower than EDF's 14.15% return. Over the past 10 years, VIMCX has outperformed EDF with an annualized return of 10.46%, while EDF has yielded a comparatively lower 4.85% annualized return.


VIMCX

1D
0.26%
1M
-1.56%
YTD
-0.89%
6M
-1.35%
1Y
-1.16%
3Y*
6.75%
5Y*
2.51%
10Y*
10.46%

EDF

1D
-0.19%
1M
3.26%
YTD
14.15%
6M
17.47%
1Y
23.82%
3Y*
26.06%
5Y*
5.00%
10Y*
4.85%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VIMCX vs. EDF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VIMCX
Virtus KAR Mid-Cap Core Fund
-0.89%0.72%5.20%22.64%-19.75%25.28%26.11%31.74%-4.18%24.95%
EDF
Virtus Stone Harbor Emerging Markets Income Fund
14.15%22.24%25.54%21.63%-27.96%-8.47%-31.14%45.06%-18.24%24.22%

Correlation

The correlation between VIMCX and EDF is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.15

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.24

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.33

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 28, 2010

0.31

The correlation between VIMCX and EDF shifts across timeframes, from 0.15 (1 year) to 0.33 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VIMCX vs. EDF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VIMCX
VIMCX Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
VIMCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VIMCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
VIMCX Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
VIMCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
VIMCX Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

EDF
EDF Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
EDF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EDF Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
EDF Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
EDF Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
EDF Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VIMCX vs. EDF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus KAR Mid-Cap Core Fund (VIMCX) and Virtus Stone Harbor Emerging Markets Income Fund (EDF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VIMCXEDFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.74

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.46

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.00

1.30

-0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.09

2.54

-2.63

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.24

9.69

-9.93

VIMCX vs. EDF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VIMCX Sharpe Ratio is -0.07, which is lower than the EDF Sharpe Ratio of 1.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VIMCX and EDF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VIMCXEDFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.07

1.67

-1.74

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

0.20

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

0.16

+0.40

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.71

0.13

+0.59

Drawdowns

VIMCX vs. EDF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VIMCX drawdown since its inception was -33.92%, smaller than the maximum EDF drawdown of -64.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VIMCX and EDF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VIMCXEDFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.92%

-64.23%

+30.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.14%

-9.44%

-2.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.32%

-24.32%

+4.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.42%

-52.53%

+24.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.92%

-64.23%

+30.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.35%

-6.37%

-0.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.89%

-21.48%

+16.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.58%

2.47%

+2.11%

Volatility

VIMCX vs. EDF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Virtus KAR Mid-Cap Core Fund (VIMCX) is 3.90%, while Virtus Stone Harbor Emerging Markets Income Fund (EDF) has a volatility of 4.90%. This indicates that VIMCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EDF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VIMCXEDFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.90%

4.90%

-1.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.03%

11.49%

+0.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.68%

14.35%

+1.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.11%

25.64%

-7.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.70%

30.69%

-11.99%

VIMCX vs. EDF - Expense Ratio Comparison

VIMCX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than EDF's 1.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

VIMCX vs. EDF - Dividend Comparison

VIMCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.45%, less than EDF's 13.46% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EDF
Virtus Stone Harbor Emerging Markets Income Fund
13.46%14.49%15.32%16.71%17.31%12.91%16.46%15.67%19.37%13.58%14.75%17.93%
VIMCX
Virtus KAR Mid-Cap Core Fund
4.45%4.41%0.00%2.36%0.23%1.58%0.67%0.94%0.77%0.29%0.00%0.63%

Frequently Asked Questions


VIMCX and EDF have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EDF has higher volatility (4.90%) compared to VIMCX (3.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VIMCX dropped -33.92% vs EDF's -64.23%.

EDF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.67 vs -0.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VIMCX and EDF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer