PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VICBX vs. CBFSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VICBX vs. CBFSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond Index Fund Institutional Shares (VICBX) and JPMorgan Corporate Bond Fund (CBFSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VICBX achieves a 0.39% return, which is significantly higher than CBFSX's 0.17% return. Over the past 10 years, VICBX has outperformed CBFSX with an annualized return of 3.21%, while CBFSX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.86% annualized return.


VICBX

1D
-0.10%
1M
0.27%
YTD
0.39%
6M
0.50%
1Y
6.51%
3Y*
6.25%
5Y*
1.36%
10Y*
3.21%

CBFSX

1D
-0.12%
1M
0.53%
YTD
0.17%
6M
0.13%
1Y
5.97%
3Y*
5.36%
5Y*
0.69%
10Y*
2.86%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VICBX vs. CBFSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VICBX
Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond Index Fund Institutional Shares
0.39%9.37%3.67%8.87%-14.06%-1.50%9.57%15.96%-1.72%5.50%
CBFSX
JPMorgan Corporate Bond Fund
0.17%7.45%2.71%9.20%-16.06%-0.77%10.23%15.05%-2.31%6.89%

Correlation

The correlation between VICBX and CBFSX is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.97

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 5, 2013

0.93

The correlation between VICBX and CBFSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VICBX vs. CBFSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VICBX
VICBX Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
VICBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VICBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
VICBX Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
VICBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
VICBX Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

CBFSX
CBFSX Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
CBFSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CBFSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
CBFSX Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
CBFSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
CBFSX Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VICBX vs. CBFSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond Index Fund Institutional Shares (VICBX) and JPMorgan Corporate Bond Fund (CBFSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VICBXCBFSXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.61

1.34

+0.27

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.37

1.96

+0.41

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.24

+0.05

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.22

1.67

+0.55

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.49

5.07

+2.42

VICBX vs. CBFSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VICBX Sharpe Ratio is 1.61, which is comparable to the CBFSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VICBX and CBFSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VICBXCBFSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.61

1.34

+0.27

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

0.10

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

0.48

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.88

0.53

+0.34

Drawdowns

VICBX vs. CBFSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VICBX drawdown since its inception was -20.55%, smaller than the maximum CBFSX drawdown of -22.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VICBX and CBFSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VICBXCBFSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.55%

-22.42%

+1.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.95%

-3.49%

+0.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.98%

-6.62%

+0.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.55%

-22.42%

+1.87%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.55%

-22.42%

+1.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.14%

-1.61%

+0.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.14%

-4.36%

+1.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.87%

1.15%

-0.28%

Volatility

VICBX vs. CBFSX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond Index Fund Institutional Shares (VICBX) is 1.39%, while JPMorgan Corporate Bond Fund (CBFSX) has a volatility of 1.47%. This indicates that VICBX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CBFSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VICBXCBFSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.39%

1.47%

-0.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.89%

3.14%

-0.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.92%

4.29%

-0.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.16%

6.64%

-0.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.34%

6.01%

-0.67%

VICBX vs. CBFSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

VICBX has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than CBFSX's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

VICBX vs. CBFSX - Dividend Comparison

VICBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.79%, more than CBFSX's 4.53% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CBFSX
JPMorgan Corporate Bond Fund
4.53%4.54%4.99%4.18%4.06%7.96%3.74%3.14%4.55%6.78%3.11%3.11%
VICBX
Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond Index Fund Institutional Shares
4.79%4.61%4.79%3.72%3.02%2.82%2.79%5.01%3.64%3.23%3.32%3.39%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, VICBX and CBFSX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

CBFSX has higher volatility (1.47%) compared to VICBX (1.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VICBX dropped -20.55% vs CBFSX's -22.42%.

VICBX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.61 vs 1.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VICBX and CBFSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer