VHYG.L vs. IWFV.L
VHYG.L (Vanguard FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF) and IWFV.L (iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF) are both Global Equities funds - VHYG.L tracks the MSCI World High Dividend Yield NR USD while IWFV.L tracks the MSCI ACWI Value NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, VHYG.L returned 11.68%/yr vs 17.48%/yr for IWFV.L. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VHYG.L charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for IWFV.L.
Performance
VHYG.L vs. IWFV.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
VHYG.L is traded in GBP, while IWFV.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the IWFV.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VHYG.L achieves a 11.62% return, which is significantly lower than IWFV.L's 34.52% return.
VHYG.L
- 1D
- 0.37%
- 1M
- 2.49%
- YTD
- 11.62%
- 6M
- 12.92%
- 1Y
- 28.77%
- 3Y*
- 15.99%
- 5Y*
- 11.68%
- 10Y*
- —
IWFV.L
- 1D
- -0.71%
- 1M
- 13.23%
- YTD
- 34.52%
- 6M
- 37.29%
- 1Y
- 67.80%
- 3Y*
- 26.96%
- 5Y*
- 17.48%
- 10Y*
- 13.69%
VHYG.L vs. IWFV.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VHYG.L Vanguard FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF | 11.62% | 18.36% | 10.99% | 5.01% | 6.20% | 19.28% | -3.61% | -18.20% |
IWFV.L iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF | 34.52% | 30.69% | 6.85% | 13.02% | 0.95% | 21.60% | -6.91% | 1.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between VHYG.L and IWFV.L is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 25, 2019 | 0.88 |
Over the past year, the correlation between VHYG.L and IWFV.L has dropped to 0.66 - well below their long-term average of 0.88, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
VHYG.L vs. IWFV.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VHYG.L
IWFV.L
Financial Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Utilities
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Real Estate
Financial Services
VHYG.L
IWFV.L
Industrials
VHYG.L
IWFV.L
Healthcare
VHYG.L
IWFV.L
Energy
VHYG.L
IWFV.L
Consumer Defensive
VHYG.L
IWFV.L
Technology
VHYG.L
IWFV.L
Consumer Cyclical
VHYG.L
IWFV.L
Utilities
VHYG.L
IWFV.L
Basic Materials
VHYG.L
IWFV.L
Communication Services
VHYG.L
IWFV.L
Real Estate
VHYG.L
IWFV.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VHYG.L vs. IWFV.L — Risk / Return Rank
VHYG.L
IWFV.L
VHYG.L vs. IWFV.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF (VHYG.L) and iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF (IWFV.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VHYG.L | IWFV.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.92 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.67 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.58 | 1.94 | -0.36 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.10 | 9.53 | -5.43 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.82 | 36.85 | -22.03 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VHYG.L | IWFV.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.10 | 5.02 | -1.92 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.05 | 1.33 | -0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.91 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.42 | 0.79 | -0.37 |
Drawdowns
VHYG.L vs. IWFV.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VHYG.L drawdown since its inception was -39.80%, which is greater than IWFV.L's maximum drawdown of -28.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VHYG.L and IWFV.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VHYG.L | IWFV.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.80% | -28.79% | -11.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.93% | -7.08% | +0.15% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.76% | -13.82% | +1.06% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -12.76% | -13.82% | +1.06% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -28.79% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.71% | +0.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.23% | -4.38% | -3.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.92% | 1.83% | +0.09% |
Volatility
VHYG.L vs. IWFV.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF (VHYG.L) is 2.27%, while iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF (IWFV.L) has a volatility of 5.45%. This indicates that VHYG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IWFV.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VHYG.L | IWFV.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.27% | 5.45% | -3.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.12% | 11.21% | -4.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.16% | 13.44% | -4.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.12% | 13.10% | -1.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.91% | 15.10% | +0.81% |
VHYG.L vs. IWFV.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
VHYG.L has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than IWFV.L's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
VHYG.L vs. IWFV.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither VHYG.L nor IWFV.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
VHYG.L and IWFV.L have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VHYG.L is cheaper at 0.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VHYG.L is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for IWFV.L.
VHYG.L tracks MSCI World High Dividend Yield NR USD, while IWFV.L tracks MSCI ACWI Value NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for VHYG.L and 0.30% for IWFV.L.
Find the right allocation for VHYG.L and IWFV.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer