PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VHVG.L vs. SBUY.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VHVG.L vs. SBUY.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Vanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF Acc (VHVG.L) and Invesco Global Buyback Achievers UCITS ETF (SBUY.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

VHVG.L is traded in GBP, while SBUY.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the SBUY.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VHVG.L achieves a 11.81% return, which is significantly higher than SBUY.L's 6.48% return.


VHVG.L

1D
-0.07%
1M
5.52%
YTD
11.81%
6M
12.27%
1Y
29.87%
3Y*
18.37%
5Y*
13.30%
10Y*

SBUY.L

1D
0.89%
1M
1.68%
YTD
6.48%
6M
8.35%
1Y
25.27%
3Y*
18.63%
5Y*
10.96%
10Y*
13.06%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VHVG.L vs. SBUY.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
VHVG.L
Vanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF Acc
11.81%13.85%19.99%17.54%-8.66%23.31%12.56%1.61%
SBUY.L
Invesco Global Buyback Achievers UCITS ETF
6.48%21.60%14.64%9.46%-0.90%21.36%8.43%3.21%

Correlation

The correlation between VHVG.L and SBUY.L is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2019

0.83

The correlation between VHVG.L and SBUY.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.70 (1 year) to 0.83 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

VHVG.L vs. SBUY.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VHVG.L
SBUY.L

Technology

29.0%
7.6%

Financial Services

15.6%
32.9%

Industrials

11.5%
11.0%

Consumer Cyclical

9.3%
15.8%

Communication Services

9.0%
4.1%

Healthcare

8.5%
5.5%

Consumer Defensive

5.1%
1.9%

Energy

4.1%
17.1%

Basic Materials

3.4%
1.4%

Utilities

2.6%
2.2%

Real Estate

2.0%
0.5%

Technology

VHVG.L
29.0%
SBUY.L
7.6%

Financial Services

VHVG.L
15.6%
SBUY.L
32.9%

Industrials

VHVG.L
11.5%
SBUY.L
11.0%

Consumer Cyclical

VHVG.L
9.3%
SBUY.L
15.8%

Communication Services

VHVG.L
9.0%
SBUY.L
4.1%

Healthcare

VHVG.L
8.5%
SBUY.L
5.5%

Consumer Defensive

VHVG.L
5.1%
SBUY.L
1.9%

Energy

VHVG.L
4.1%
SBUY.L
17.1%

Basic Materials

VHVG.L
3.4%
SBUY.L
1.4%

Utilities

VHVG.L
2.6%
SBUY.L
2.2%

Real Estate

VHVG.L
2.0%
SBUY.L
0.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VHVG.L vs. SBUY.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VHVG.L
VHVG.L Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
VHVG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VHVG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
VHVG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
VHVG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
VHVG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

SBUY.L
SBUY.L Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
SBUY.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SBUY.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
SBUY.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
SBUY.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
SBUY.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VHVG.L vs. SBUY.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF Acc (VHVG.L) and Invesco Global Buyback Achievers UCITS ETF (SBUY.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VHVG.LSBUY.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.33

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.46

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.55

1.46

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.29

5.25

-0.96

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.65

16.93

+0.72

VHVG.L vs. SBUY.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VHVG.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.90, which is comparable to the SBUY.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VHVG.L and SBUY.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VHVG.LSBUY.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.90

2.57

+0.33

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.03

0.80

+0.23

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.89

0.84

+0.04

Drawdowns

VHVG.L vs. SBUY.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VHVG.L drawdown since its inception was -25.41%, smaller than the maximum SBUY.L drawdown of -30.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VHVG.L and SBUY.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VHVG.LSBUY.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.41%

-30.91%

+5.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.94%

-4.79%

-2.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.96%

-17.76%

-0.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.96%

-17.76%

-0.20%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.36%

0.00%

-0.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.28%

-3.99%

+0.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.69%

1.49%

+0.20%

Volatility

VHVG.L vs. SBUY.L - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF Acc (VHVG.L) has a higher volatility of 2.72% compared to Invesco Global Buyback Achievers UCITS ETF (SBUY.L) at 2.32%. This indicates that VHVG.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SBUY.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VHVG.LSBUY.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.72%

2.32%

+0.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.53%

7.04%

+0.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.27%

9.81%

+0.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.97%

13.73%

-0.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.06%

15.51%

-0.45%

VHVG.L vs. SBUY.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

VHVG.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than SBUY.L's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

VHVG.L vs. SBUY.L - Dividend Comparison

VHVG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SBUY.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.69%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SBUY.L
Invesco Global Buyback Achievers UCITS ETF
1.69%1.86%1.80%1.73%1.91%1.20%1.62%1.90%1.31%1.22%1.60%1.27%
VHVG.L
Vanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


VHVG.L and SBUY.L have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VHVG.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VHVG.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for SBUY.L.

Both ETFs track MSCI ACWI NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for VHVG.L and 0.39% for SBUY.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VHVG.L and SBUY.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer