PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VHVG.L vs. ICSU.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VHVG.L vs. ICSU.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Vanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF Acc (VHVG.L) and iShares S&P 500 Consumer Staples Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ICSU.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

VHVG.L is traded in GBP, while ICSU.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the ICSU.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VHVG.L achieves a 11.81% return, which is significantly higher than ICSU.L's 6.60% return.


VHVG.L

1D
-0.07%
1M
5.52%
YTD
11.81%
6M
12.27%
1Y
29.87%
3Y*
18.37%
5Y*
13.30%
10Y*

ICSU.L

1D
0.03%
1M
-1.78%
YTD
6.60%
6M
6.25%
1Y
3.19%
3Y*
5.52%
5Y*
7.91%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VHVG.L vs. ICSU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
VHVG.L
Vanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF Acc
11.81%13.85%19.99%17.54%-8.66%23.31%12.56%1.61%
ICSU.L
iShares S&P 500 Consumer Staples Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
6.60%-3.20%16.26%-5.83%11.78%19.63%5.64%-2.73%

Correlation

The correlation between VHVG.L and ICSU.L is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.04

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.19

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.31

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2019

0.42

The correlation between VHVG.L and ICSU.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.04 (1 year) to 0.42 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

VHVG.L vs. ICSU.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VHVG.L
ICSU.L

Technology

29.0%

-

Financial Services

15.6%

-

Industrials

11.5%

-

Consumer Cyclical

9.3%
1.0%

Communication Services

9.0%

-

Healthcare

8.5%

-

Consumer Defensive

5.1%
99.0%

Energy

4.1%

-

Basic Materials

3.4%

-

Utilities

2.6%

-

Real Estate

2.0%

-

Technology

VHVG.L
29.0%
ICSU.L

-

Financial Services

VHVG.L
15.6%
ICSU.L

-

Industrials

VHVG.L
11.5%
ICSU.L

-

Consumer Cyclical

VHVG.L
9.3%
ICSU.L
1.0%

Communication Services

VHVG.L
9.0%
ICSU.L

-

Healthcare

VHVG.L
8.5%
ICSU.L

-

Consumer Defensive

VHVG.L
5.1%
ICSU.L
99.0%

Energy

VHVG.L
4.1%
ICSU.L

-

Basic Materials

VHVG.L
3.4%
ICSU.L

-

Utilities

VHVG.L
2.6%
ICSU.L

-

Real Estate

VHVG.L
2.0%
ICSU.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VHVG.L vs. ICSU.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VHVG.L
VHVG.L Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
VHVG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VHVG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
VHVG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
VHVG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
VHVG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

ICSU.L
ICSU.L Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
ICSU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ICSU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
ICSU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
ICSU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
ICSU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VHVG.L vs. ICSU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF Acc (VHVG.L) and iShares S&P 500 Consumer Staples Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ICSU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VHVG.LICSU.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.68

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.56

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.55

1.05

+0.50

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.29

0.34

+3.94

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.65

0.82

+16.83

VHVG.L vs. ICSU.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VHVG.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.90, which is higher than the ICSU.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VHVG.L and ICSU.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VHVG.LICSU.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.90

0.22

+2.68

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.03

0.59

+0.44

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.89

0.48

+0.41

Drawdowns

VHVG.L vs. ICSU.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VHVG.L drawdown since its inception was -25.41%, which is greater than ICSU.L's maximum drawdown of -18.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VHVG.L and ICSU.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VHVG.LICSU.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.41%

-18.54%

-6.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.94%

-9.24%

+2.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.96%

-11.59%

-6.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.96%

-13.70%

-4.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.36%

-7.40%

+7.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.28%

-4.93%

+1.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.69%

3.87%

-2.18%

Volatility

VHVG.L vs. ICSU.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF Acc (VHVG.L) is 2.72%, while iShares S&P 500 Consumer Staples Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ICSU.L) has a volatility of 6.57%. This indicates that VHVG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ICSU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VHVG.LICSU.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.72%

6.57%

-3.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.53%

11.97%

-4.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.27%

14.37%

-4.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.97%

13.45%

-0.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.06%

14.31%

+0.75%

VHVG.L vs. ICSU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

VHVG.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than ICSU.L's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VHVG.L vs. ICSU.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither VHVG.L nor ICSU.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


VHVG.L and ICSU.L have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VHVG.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VHVG.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for ICSU.L.

VHVG.L is categorized as Global Equities, while ICSU.L is Consumer Staples Equities. VHVG.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD, while ICSU.L tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Consumer Staples Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for VHVG.L and 0.15% for ICSU.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VHVG.L and ICSU.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer