VHVG.L vs. ICSU.L
VHVG.L (Vanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF Acc) and ICSU.L (iShares S&P 500 Consumer Staples Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - VHVG.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI NR USD, while ICSU.L is a Consumer Staples Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Consumer Staples Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, VHVG.L returned 13.30%/yr vs 7.91%/yr for ICSU.L. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. VHVG.L charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for ICSU.L.
Performance
VHVG.L vs. ICSU.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
VHVG.L is traded in GBP, while ICSU.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the ICSU.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VHVG.L achieves a 11.81% return, which is significantly higher than ICSU.L's 6.60% return.
VHVG.L
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- 5.52%
- YTD
- 11.81%
- 6M
- 12.27%
- 1Y
- 29.87%
- 3Y*
- 18.37%
- 5Y*
- 13.30%
- 10Y*
- —
ICSU.L
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- -1.78%
- YTD
- 6.60%
- 6M
- 6.25%
- 1Y
- 3.19%
- 3Y*
- 5.52%
- 5Y*
- 7.91%
- 10Y*
- —
VHVG.L vs. ICSU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VHVG.L Vanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF Acc | 11.81% | 13.85% | 19.99% | 17.54% | -8.66% | 23.31% | 12.56% | 1.61% |
ICSU.L iShares S&P 500 Consumer Staples Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 6.60% | -3.20% | 16.26% | -5.83% | 11.78% | 19.63% | 5.64% | -2.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between VHVG.L and ICSU.L is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.04 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2019 | 0.42 |
The correlation between VHVG.L and ICSU.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.04 (1 year) to 0.42 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
VHVG.L vs. ICSU.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VHVG.L
ICSU.L
Technology
-
Financial Services
-
Industrials
-
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
-
Healthcare
-
Consumer Defensive
Energy
-
Basic Materials
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
VHVG.L
ICSU.L
-
Financial Services
VHVG.L
ICSU.L
-
Industrials
VHVG.L
ICSU.L
-
Consumer Cyclical
VHVG.L
ICSU.L
Communication Services
VHVG.L
ICSU.L
-
Healthcare
VHVG.L
ICSU.L
-
Consumer Defensive
VHVG.L
ICSU.L
Energy
VHVG.L
ICSU.L
-
Basic Materials
VHVG.L
ICSU.L
-
Utilities
VHVG.L
ICSU.L
-
Real Estate
VHVG.L
ICSU.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VHVG.L vs. ICSU.L — Risk / Return Rank
VHVG.L
ICSU.L
VHVG.L vs. ICSU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF Acc (VHVG.L) and iShares S&P 500 Consumer Staples Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ICSU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VHVG.L | ICSU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.68 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.56 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.55 | 1.05 | +0.50 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.29 | 0.34 | +3.94 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.65 | 0.82 | +16.83 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VHVG.L | ICSU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.90 | 0.22 | +2.68 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.03 | 0.59 | +0.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.89 | 0.48 | +0.41 |
Drawdowns
VHVG.L vs. ICSU.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VHVG.L drawdown since its inception was -25.41%, which is greater than ICSU.L's maximum drawdown of -18.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VHVG.L and ICSU.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VHVG.L | ICSU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.41% | -18.54% | -6.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.94% | -9.24% | +2.30% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.96% | -11.59% | -6.37% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.96% | -13.70% | -4.26% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.36% | -7.40% | +7.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.28% | -4.93% | +1.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.69% | 3.87% | -2.18% |
Volatility
VHVG.L vs. ICSU.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF Acc (VHVG.L) is 2.72%, while iShares S&P 500 Consumer Staples Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ICSU.L) has a volatility of 6.57%. This indicates that VHVG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ICSU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VHVG.L | ICSU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.72% | 6.57% | -3.85% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.53% | 11.97% | -4.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.27% | 14.37% | -4.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.97% | 13.45% | -0.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.06% | 14.31% | +0.75% |
VHVG.L vs. ICSU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
VHVG.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than ICSU.L's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VHVG.L vs. ICSU.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither VHVG.L nor ICSU.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
VHVG.L and ICSU.L have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VHVG.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VHVG.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for ICSU.L.
VHVG.L is categorized as Global Equities, while ICSU.L is Consumer Staples Equities. VHVG.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD, while ICSU.L tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Consumer Staples Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for VHVG.L and 0.15% for ICSU.L.
Find the right allocation for VHVG.L and ICSU.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer