PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VHVG.L vs. FLES.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VHVG.L vs. FLES.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Vanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF Acc (VHVG.L) and Franklin Euro Short Maturity UCITS ETF (FLES.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

VHVG.L is traded in GBP, while FLES.L is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the FLES.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VHVG.L achieves a 11.13% return, which is significantly higher than FLES.L's -1.89% return.


VHVG.L

1D
-0.66%
1M
-0.92%
6M
9.80%
YTD
11.13%
1Y
22.93%
3Y*
18.32%
5Y*
12.29%
10Y*

FLES.L

1D
-0.55%
1M
-1.80%
6M
-1.28%
YTD
-1.89%
1Y
-0.40%
3Y*
2.78%
5Y*
1.97%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VHVG.L vs. FLES.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
VHVG.L
Vanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF Acc
11.13%13.84%20.00%17.53%-8.16%22.64%12.56%-17.91%
FLES.L
Franklin Euro Short Maturity UCITS ETF
-1.89%7.85%-0.52%1.23%5.31%-5.82%5.53%-4.05%

Correlation

The correlation between VHVG.L and FLES.L is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.18

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.07

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.10

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2019

0.13

The correlation between VHVG.L and FLES.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.07 (3 years) to 0.17 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VHVG.L vs. FLES.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VHVG.L
VHVG.L Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
VHVG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VHVG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
VHVG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
VHVG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
VHVG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

FLES.L
FLES.L Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
FLES.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLES.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLES.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
FLES.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLES.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VHVG.L vs. FLES.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF Acc (VHVG.L) and Franklin Euro Short Maturity UCITS ETF (FLES.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VHVG.LFLES.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

0.99

+0.40

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.29

-0.13

+3.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.95

-0.35

+13.30

VHVG.L vs. FLES.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VHVG.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.10, which is higher than the FLES.L Sharpe Ratio of -0.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VHVG.L and FLES.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VHVG.L vs. FLES.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VHVG.L drawdown since its inception was -35.32%, which is greater than FLES.L's maximum drawdown of -10.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VHVG.L and FLES.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VHVG.LFLES.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.32%

-10.70%

-24.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.94%

-3.01%

-3.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.95%

-3.07%

-16.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.95%

-4.87%

-15.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.90%

-3.01%

+1.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.08%

-4.40%

-2.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.77%

1.15%

+0.62%

Volatility

VHVG.L vs. FLES.L - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF Acc (VHVG.L) has a higher volatility of 3.23% compared to Franklin Euro Short Maturity UCITS ETF (FLES.L) at 0.97%. This indicates that VHVG.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLES.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VHVG.LFLES.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.23%

0.97%

+2.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.37%

2.70%

+5.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.88%

4.02%

+6.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.00%

5.44%

+13.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.47%

6.28%

+14.19%

Dividends

VHVG.L vs. FLES.L - Dividend Comparison

VHVG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FLES.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.92%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
FLES.L
Franklin Euro Short Maturity UCITS ETF
1.92%2.62%2.55%1.20%0.26%
VHVG.L
Vanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


VHVG.L and FLES.L have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VHVG.L tracks FTSE Developed Index, while FLES.L tracks Franklin Euro Short Maturity UCITS ETF. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Franklin.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VHVG.L and FLES.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer