PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VHVE.L vs. PACW.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VHVE.L vs. PACW.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF USD Acc (VHVE.L) and Amundi Prime All Country World UCITS ETF Income (PACW.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

VHVE.L is traded in USD, while PACW.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the PACW.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with VHVE.L having a 11.59% return and PACW.L slightly higher at 11.64%.


VHVE.L

1D
-0.07%
1M
4.47%
YTD
11.59%
6M
12.99%
1Y
28.64%
3Y*
21.52%
5Y*
12.10%
10Y*

PACW.L

1D
0.01%
1M
4.35%
YTD
11.64%
6M
13.14%
1Y
29.05%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VHVE.L vs. PACW.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between VHVE.L and PACW.L is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 19, 2025

0.93

The correlation between VHVE.L and PACW.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VHVE.L vs. PACW.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VHVE.L
VHVE.L Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
VHVE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VHVE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
VHVE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
VHVE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
VHVE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

PACW.L
PACW.L Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
PACW.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PACW.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
PACW.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
PACW.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
PACW.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VHVE.L vs. PACW.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF USD Acc (VHVE.L) and Amundi Prime All Country World UCITS ETF Income (PACW.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VHVE.LPACW.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.45

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.35

3.16

+0.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.41

13.73

+0.68

VHVE.L vs. PACW.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VHVE.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.34, which is comparable to the PACW.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VHVE.L and PACW.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VHVE.LPACW.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.34

2.45

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.85

1.50

-0.65

Drawdowns

VHVE.L vs. PACW.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VHVE.L drawdown since its inception was -33.60%, which is greater than PACW.L's maximum drawdown of -16.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VHVE.L and PACW.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VHVE.LPACW.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.60%

-16.93%

-16.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.51%

-9.14%

+0.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.66%

-0.78%

+0.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.36%

-1.97%

-3.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.98%

2.11%

-0.13%

Volatility

VHVE.L vs. PACW.L - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF USD Acc (VHVE.L) has a higher volatility of 3.64% compared to Amundi Prime All Country World UCITS ETF Income (PACW.L) at 3.42%. This indicates that VHVE.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PACW.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VHVE.LPACW.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.64%

3.42%

+0.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.55%

9.17%

+0.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.20%

11.81%

+0.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.56%

15.34%

+0.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.51%

15.34%

+2.17%

VHVE.L vs. PACW.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

VHVE.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than PACW.L's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VHVE.L vs. PACW.L - Dividend Comparison

VHVE.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PACW.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.23%.


Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, VHVE.L and PACW.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, PACW.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PACW.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for VHVE.L.

VHVE.L tracks FTSE Developed, while PACW.L tracks Solactive GBS Global Markets Large & Mid Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for VHVE.L and 0.07% for PACW.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VHVE.L and PACW.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer