PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VHVE.L vs. IQSA.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VHVE.L vs. IQSA.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF USD Acc (VHVE.L) and Invesco Global Active ESG Equity UCITS ETF USD Acc (IQSA.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VHVE.L achieves a 11.59% return, which is significantly lower than IQSA.L's 14.07% return.


VHVE.L

1D
-0.07%
1M
4.47%
YTD
11.59%
6M
12.99%
1Y
28.64%
3Y*
21.52%
5Y*
12.10%
10Y*

IQSA.L

1D
0.00%
1M
5.34%
YTD
14.07%
6M
16.56%
1Y
30.89%
3Y*
25.43%
5Y*
14.40%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VHVE.L vs. IQSA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
VHVE.L
Vanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF USD Acc
11.59%22.18%17.93%24.66%-18.06%21.15%16.52%8.50%
IQSA.L
Invesco Global Active ESG Equity UCITS ETF USD Acc
14.07%22.67%22.82%24.38%-14.01%24.96%10.21%7.91%

Correlation

The correlation between VHVE.L and IQSA.L is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2019

0.94

The correlation between VHVE.L and IQSA.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

VHVE.L vs. IQSA.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VHVE.L
IQSA.L

Technology

29.0%
33.0%

Financial Services

15.6%
21.2%

Industrials

11.5%
13.3%

Consumer Cyclical

9.3%
7.9%

Communication Services

9.0%
11.3%

Healthcare

8.5%
7.3%

Consumer Defensive

5.1%
1.8%

Energy

4.1%

-

Basic Materials

3.4%
3.7%

Utilities

2.6%
0.3%

Real Estate

2.0%
0.3%

Technology

VHVE.L
29.0%
IQSA.L
33.0%

Financial Services

VHVE.L
15.6%
IQSA.L
21.2%

Industrials

VHVE.L
11.5%
IQSA.L
13.3%

Consumer Cyclical

VHVE.L
9.3%
IQSA.L
7.9%

Communication Services

VHVE.L
9.0%
IQSA.L
11.3%

Healthcare

VHVE.L
8.5%
IQSA.L
7.3%

Consumer Defensive

VHVE.L
5.1%
IQSA.L
1.8%

Energy

VHVE.L
4.1%
IQSA.L

-

Basic Materials

VHVE.L
3.4%
IQSA.L
3.7%

Utilities

VHVE.L
2.6%
IQSA.L
0.3%

Real Estate

VHVE.L
2.0%
IQSA.L
0.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VHVE.L vs. IQSA.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VHVE.L
VHVE.L Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
VHVE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VHVE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
VHVE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
VHVE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
VHVE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

IQSA.L
IQSA.L Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
IQSA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IQSA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
IQSA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
IQSA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
IQSA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VHVE.L vs. IQSA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF USD Acc (VHVE.L) and Invesco Global Active ESG Equity UCITS ETF USD Acc (IQSA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VHVE.LIQSA.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.43

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.35

3.55

-0.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.41

15.35

-0.94

VHVE.L vs. IQSA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VHVE.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.34, which is comparable to the IQSA.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VHVE.L and IQSA.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VHVE.LIQSA.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.34

2.35

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

0.87

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.85

0.92

-0.08

Drawdowns

VHVE.L vs. IQSA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VHVE.L drawdown since its inception was -33.60%, roughly equal to the maximum IQSA.L drawdown of -34.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VHVE.L and IQSA.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VHVE.LIQSA.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.60%

-34.64%

+1.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.51%

-8.65%

+0.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.52%

-17.00%

+0.48%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.08%

-25.67%

-0.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.66%

-0.53%

-0.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.36%

-4.91%

-0.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.98%

2.01%

-0.03%

Volatility

VHVE.L vs. IQSA.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF USD Acc (VHVE.L) is 3.64%, while Invesco Global Active ESG Equity UCITS ETF USD Acc (IQSA.L) has a volatility of 4.00%. This indicates that VHVE.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IQSA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VHVE.LIQSA.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.64%

4.00%

-0.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.55%

10.26%

-0.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.20%

13.06%

-0.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.56%

16.54%

-0.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.51%

18.14%

-0.63%

VHVE.L vs. IQSA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

VHVE.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than IQSA.L's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

VHVE.L vs. IQSA.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither VHVE.L nor IQSA.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, VHVE.L and IQSA.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, VHVE.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VHVE.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for IQSA.L.

They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for VHVE.L and 0.30% for IQSA.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VHVE.L and IQSA.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer