PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VHT vs. VTV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VHT vs. VTV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Health Care ETF (VHT) and Vanguard Value ETF (VTV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VHT achieves a -4.02% return, which is significantly lower than VTV's 12.30% return. Over the past 10 years, VHT has underperformed VTV with an annualized return of 9.26%, while VTV has yielded a comparatively higher 12.48% annualized return.


VHT

1D
0.84%
1M
1.45%
YTD
-4.02%
6M
-4.15%
1Y
14.34%
3Y*
6.14%
5Y*
4.51%
10Y*
9.26%

VTV

1D
0.01%
1M
4.23%
YTD
12.30%
6M
13.12%
1Y
26.25%
3Y*
18.28%
5Y*
11.24%
10Y*
12.48%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VHT vs. VTV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VHT
Vanguard Health Care ETF
-4.02%15.46%2.66%2.52%-5.60%20.57%18.29%21.87%5.58%23.26%
VTV
Vanguard Value ETF
12.30%15.27%15.95%9.32%-2.09%26.53%2.33%25.66%-5.47%17.15%

Correlation

The correlation between VHT and VTV is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.59

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.69

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2004

0.75

The correlation between VHT and VTV shifts across timeframes, from 0.59 (1 year) to 0.75 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

VHT vs. VTV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VHT
VTV

Healthcare

100.0%
14.5%

Financial Services

0.0%
22.3%

Industrials

0.0%
14.0%

Technology

0.0%
13.4%

Basic Materials

-

3.1%

Communication Services

-

3.3%

Consumer Cyclical

-

4.0%

Consumer Defensive

-

9.4%

Energy

-

8.1%

Real Estate

-

2.8%

Utilities

-

5.2%

Healthcare

VHT
100.0%
VTV
14.5%

Financial Services

VHT
0.0%
VTV
22.3%

Industrials

VHT
0.0%
VTV
14.0%

Technology

VHT
0.0%
VTV
13.4%

Basic Materials

VHT

-

VTV
3.1%

Communication Services

VHT

-

VTV
3.3%

Consumer Cyclical

VHT

-

VTV
4.0%

Consumer Defensive

VHT

-

VTV
9.4%

Energy

VHT

-

VTV
8.1%

Real Estate

VHT

-

VTV
2.8%

Utilities

VHT

-

VTV
5.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VHT vs. VTV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VHT
VHT Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
VHT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VHT Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
VHT Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
VHT Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
VHT Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

VTV
VTV Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
VTV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTV Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
VTV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTV Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VHT vs. VTV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Health Care ETF (VHT) and Vanguard Value ETF (VTV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VHTVTVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.61

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.47

-0.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.38

4.15

-2.77

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.47

15.69

-12.22

VHT vs. VTV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VHT Sharpe Ratio is 1.00, which is lower than the VTV Sharpe Ratio of 2.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VHT and VTV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VHTVTVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.00

2.61

-1.61

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

0.81

-0.51

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

0.75

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.56

0.51

+0.05

Drawdowns

VHT vs. VTV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VHT drawdown since its inception was -39.12%, smaller than the maximum VTV drawdown of -59.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VHT and VTV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VHTVTVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.12%

-59.27%

+20.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.40%

-6.35%

-4.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.91%

-14.52%

-2.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.71%

-17.04%

-0.67%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.85%

-36.78%

+7.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.05%

0.00%

-7.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.99%

-7.87%

+1.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.14%

1.68%

+2.46%

Volatility

VHT vs. VTV - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Health Care ETF (VHT) has a higher volatility of 4.08% compared to Vanguard Value ETF (VTV) at 2.52%. This indicates that VHT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VTV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VHTVTVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.08%

2.52%

+1.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.08%

7.55%

+2.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.34%

10.11%

+4.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.96%

13.88%

+1.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.94%

16.67%

+0.27%

VHT vs. VTV - Expense Ratio Comparison

VHT has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than VTV's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VHT vs. VTV - Dividend Comparison

VHT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.71%, less than VTV's 1.86% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VHT
Vanguard Health Care ETF
1.71%1.61%1.53%1.36%1.33%1.14%1.21%1.89%1.38%1.31%1.45%1.22%
VTV
Vanguard Value ETF
1.86%2.05%2.31%2.46%2.52%2.15%2.56%2.50%2.73%2.29%2.44%2.60%

Frequently Asked Questions


VHT and VTV have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VHT has higher volatility (4.08%) compared to VTV (2.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VHT dropped -39.12% vs VTV's -59.27%.

On 10-year performance, VTV leads with 12.48% vs 9.26% for VHT. On fees, VTV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, VTV has been the lower-risk option at 2.52%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VTV has performed better with a 12.48% return vs 9.26%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VTV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for VHT.

VTV has the higher dividend yield at 1.86%, compared with 1.71% for VHT.

VHT is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while VTV is Large Cap Value Equities. VHT tracks MSCI US Investable Market Health Care 25/50 Index, while VTV tracks CRSP US Large Cap Value Index. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for VHT and 0.04% for VTV.

VTV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.61 vs 1.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VHT and VTV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer