PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VHT vs. VAW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VHT vs. VAW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Health Care ETF (VHT) and Vanguard Materials ETF (VAW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VHT achieves a -0.11% return, which is significantly lower than VAW's 13.71% return. Over the past 10 years, VHT has underperformed VAW with an annualized return of 9.87%, while VAW has yielded a comparatively higher 10.56% annualized return.


VHT

1D
-0.12%
1M
4.39%
YTD
-0.11%
6M
0.45%
1Y
15.89%
3Y*
7.19%
5Y*
4.78%
10Y*
9.87%

VAW

1D
1.79%
1M
-0.28%
YTD
13.71%
6M
14.42%
1Y
22.18%
3Y*
11.43%
5Y*
6.23%
10Y*
10.56%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VHT vs. VAW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VHT
Vanguard Health Care ETF
-0.11%15.46%2.66%2.52%-5.60%20.57%18.29%21.87%5.58%23.26%
VAW
Vanguard Materials ETF
13.71%12.30%0.48%13.67%-11.80%27.43%19.44%23.53%-17.49%23.76%

Correlation

The correlation between VHT and VAW is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.45

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.53

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2004

0.61

The correlation between VHT and VAW shifts across timeframes, from 0.45 (1 year) to 0.61 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

VHT vs. VAW - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VHT
VAW

Healthcare

100.0%
0.5%

Financial Services

0.0%

-

Industrials

0.0%
1.0%

Technology

0.0%
0.1%

Basic Materials

-

90.2%

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

8.3%

Consumer Defensive

-

0.0%

Energy

-

0.5%

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Healthcare

VHT
100.0%
VAW
0.5%

Financial Services

VHT
0.0%
VAW

-

Industrials

VHT
0.0%
VAW
1.0%

Technology

VHT
0.0%
VAW
0.1%

Basic Materials

VHT

-

VAW
90.2%

Communication Services

VHT

-

VAW

-

Consumer Cyclical

VHT

-

VAW
8.3%

Consumer Defensive

VHT

-

VAW
0.0%

Energy

VHT

-

VAW
0.5%

Real Estate

VHT

-

VAW

-

Utilities

VHT

-

VAW

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VHT vs. VAW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VHT
VHT Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
VHT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VHT Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
VHT Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
VHT Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
VHT Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

VAW
VAW Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
VAW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VAW Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
VAW Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
VAW Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
VAW Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VHT vs. VAW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Health Care ETF (VHT) and Vanguard Materials ETF (VAW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VHTVAWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.21

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.53

1.66

-0.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.81

5.30

-1.49

VHT vs. VAW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VHT Sharpe Ratio is 1.09, which is comparable to the VAW Sharpe Ratio of 1.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VHT and VAW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VHT vs. VAW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VHT drawdown since its inception was -39.12%, smaller than the maximum VAW drawdown of -62.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VHT and VAW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VHTVAWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.12%

-62.17%

+23.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.40%

-13.42%

+3.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.91%

-23.21%

+6.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.71%

-25.50%

+7.79%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.85%

-41.13%

+12.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.28%

-3.33%

+0.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.99%

-9.63%

+3.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.19%

4.20%

-0.01%

Volatility

VHT vs. VAW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Health Care ETF (VHT) is 4.88%, while Vanguard Materials ETF (VAW) has a volatility of 7.64%. This indicates that VHT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VAW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VHTVAWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.88%

7.64%

-2.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.46%

14.81%

-4.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.70%

18.45%

-3.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.01%

19.76%

-4.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.97%

21.26%

-4.29%

VHT vs. VAW - Expense Ratio Comparison

VHT has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than VAW's 0.10% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VHT vs. VAW - Dividend Comparison

VHT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.64%, more than VAW's 1.36% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VAW
Vanguard Materials ETF
1.36%1.55%1.70%1.72%1.98%1.44%1.67%1.94%2.03%1.63%1.67%2.30%
VHT
Vanguard Health Care ETF
1.64%1.61%1.53%1.36%1.33%1.14%1.21%1.89%1.38%1.31%1.45%1.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


VHT and VAW have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VAW has higher volatility (7.64%) compared to VHT (4.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VHT dropped -39.12% vs VAW's -62.17%.

On 10-year performance, VAW leads with 10.56% vs 9.87% for VHT. On fees, VHT is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, VHT has been the lower-risk option at 4.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VAW has performed better with a 10.56% return vs 9.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VHT is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for VAW.

VHT has the higher dividend yield at 1.64%, compared with 1.36% for VAW.

VHT is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while VAW is Materials. VHT tracks MSCI US Investable Market Health Care 25/50 Index, while VAW tracks MSCI US Investable Market Materials 25/50 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for VHT and 0.10% for VAW.

VAW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.21 vs 1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VHT and VAW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer