VHT vs. VAW
VHT (Vanguard Health Care ETF) and VAW (Vanguard Materials ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VHT is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the MSCI US Investable Market Health Care 25/50 Index, while VAW is a Materials fund tracking the MSCI US Investable Market Materials 25/50 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VHT returned 9.87%/yr vs 10.56%/yr for VAW. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VHT charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for VAW.
Performance
VHT vs. VAW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VHT achieves a -0.11% return, which is significantly lower than VAW's 13.71% return. Over the past 10 years, VHT has underperformed VAW with an annualized return of 9.87%, while VAW has yielded a comparatively higher 10.56% annualized return.
VHT
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 4.39%
- YTD
- -0.11%
- 6M
- 0.45%
- 1Y
- 15.89%
- 3Y*
- 7.19%
- 5Y*
- 4.78%
- 10Y*
- 9.87%
VAW
- 1D
- 1.79%
- 1M
- -0.28%
- YTD
- 13.71%
- 6M
- 14.42%
- 1Y
- 22.18%
- 3Y*
- 11.43%
- 5Y*
- 6.23%
- 10Y*
- 10.56%
VHT vs. VAW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VHT Vanguard Health Care ETF | -0.11% | 15.46% | 2.66% | 2.52% | -5.60% | 20.57% | 18.29% | 21.87% | 5.58% | 23.26% |
VAW Vanguard Materials ETF | 13.71% | 12.30% | 0.48% | 13.67% | -11.80% | 27.43% | 19.44% | 23.53% | -17.49% | 23.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between VHT and VAW is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2004 | 0.61 |
The correlation between VHT and VAW shifts across timeframes, from 0.45 (1 year) to 0.61 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
VHT vs. VAW - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VHT
VAW
Healthcare
Financial Services
-
Industrials
Technology
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Healthcare
VHT
VAW
Financial Services
VHT
VAW
-
Industrials
VHT
VAW
Technology
VHT
VAW
Basic Materials
VHT
-
VAW
Communication Services
VHT
-
VAW
-
Consumer Cyclical
VHT
-
VAW
Consumer Defensive
VHT
-
VAW
Energy
VHT
-
VAW
Real Estate
VHT
-
VAW
-
Utilities
VHT
-
VAW
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VHT vs. VAW — Risk / Return Rank
VHT
VAW
VHT vs. VAW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Health Care ETF (VHT) and Vanguard Materials ETF (VAW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VHT | VAW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.12 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.21 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.53 | 1.66 | -0.13 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.81 | 5.30 | -1.49 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VHT vs. VAW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VHT drawdown since its inception was -39.12%, smaller than the maximum VAW drawdown of -62.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VHT and VAW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VHT | VAW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.12% | -62.17% | +23.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.40% | -13.42% | +3.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.91% | -23.21% | +6.30% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.71% | -25.50% | +7.79% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -28.85% | -41.13% | +12.28% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.28% | -3.33% | +0.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.99% | -9.63% | +3.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.19% | 4.20% | -0.01% |
Volatility
VHT vs. VAW - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard Health Care ETF (VHT) is 4.88%, while Vanguard Materials ETF (VAW) has a volatility of 7.64%. This indicates that VHT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VAW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VHT | VAW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.88% | 7.64% | -2.76% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.46% | 14.81% | -4.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.70% | 18.45% | -3.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.01% | 19.76% | -4.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.97% | 21.26% | -4.29% |
VHT vs. VAW - Expense Ratio Comparison
VHT has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than VAW's 0.10% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VHT vs. VAW - Dividend Comparison
VHT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.64%, more than VAW's 1.36% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VAW Vanguard Materials ETF | 1.36% | 1.55% | 1.70% | 1.72% | 1.98% | 1.44% | 1.67% | 1.94% | 2.03% | 1.63% | 1.67% | 2.30% |
VHT Vanguard Health Care ETF | 1.64% | 1.61% | 1.53% | 1.36% | 1.33% | 1.14% | 1.21% | 1.89% | 1.38% | 1.31% | 1.45% | 1.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VHT and VAW have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VAW has higher volatility (7.64%) compared to VHT (4.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VHT dropped -39.12% vs VAW's -62.17%.
On 10-year performance, VAW leads with 10.56% vs 9.87% for VHT. On fees, VHT is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, VHT has been the lower-risk option at 4.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VAW has performed better with a 10.56% return vs 9.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VHT is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for VAW.
VHT has the higher dividend yield at 1.64%, compared with 1.36% for VAW.
VHT is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while VAW is Materials. VHT tracks MSCI US Investable Market Health Care 25/50 Index, while VAW tracks MSCI US Investable Market Materials 25/50 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for VHT and 0.10% for VAW.
VAW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.21 vs 1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VHT and VAW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer