VHT vs. UNHW

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

VHT (Vanguard Health Care ETF) and UNHW (Roundhill UNH WeeklyPay ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VHT is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the MSCI US Investable Market Health Care 25/50 Index, while UNHW is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Roundhill. VHT is passively managed, while UNHW is actively managed. Their 0.42 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. VHT charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for UNHW.

Performance

VHT vs. UNHW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Health Care ETF (VHT) and Roundhill UNH WeeklyPay ETF (UNHW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VHT achieves a 6.55% return, which is significantly lower than UNHW's 28.89% return.

VHT

• 1D: -0.10%
• 1M: -1.26%
• 6M: 6.12%
• YTD: 6.55%
• 1Y: 27.80%
• 3Y*: 9.41%
• 5Y*: 4.81%
• 10Y*: 9.88%
• ALL TIME*: 9.91%

UNHW

• 1D: 0.09%
• 1M: -2.71%
• 6M: 54.46%
• YTD: 28.89%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
UNHW Roundhill UNH WeeklyPay ETF	$423.60K	$609.21K	$366.99K
VHT Vanguard Health Care ETF	$69.93M	$73.70M	$74.65M

VHT vs. UNHW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
VHT Vanguard Health Care ETF	6.55%	0.43%
UNHW Roundhill UNH WeeklyPay ETF	28.89%	1.54%

Correlation

The correlation between VHT and UNHW is 0.42, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2025	0.42

Return for Risk

VHT vs. UNHW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

VHT

VHT Risk / Return Rank: 74
VHT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
VHT Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
VHT Omega Ratio Rank: 75
VHT Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
VHT Martin Ratio Rank: 55

UNHW

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

VHT vs. UNHW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Health Care ETF (VHT) and Roundhill UNH WeeklyPay ETF (UNHW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	VHT	UNHW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.84	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.85	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.68	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.64	—	—

Drawdowns

VHT vs. UNHW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VHT drawdown since its inception was -39.12%, which is greater than UNHW's maximum drawdown of -32.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VHT and UNHW.

Drawdown Indicators

	VHT	UNHW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-39.12%	-32.28%	-6.84%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.40%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.91%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.71%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-28.85%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.78%	-5.84%	+3.06%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.96%	-9.80%	+3.84%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.20%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	VHT	UNHW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.92%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.63%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.17%	46.31%	-31.14%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.25%	46.31%	-31.06%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.03%	46.31%	-29.28%

VHT vs. UNHW - Expense Ratio Comparison

VHT has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than UNHW's 0.99% expense ratio.

Dividends

VHT vs. UNHW - Dividend Comparison

VHT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.55%, less than UNHW's 22.57% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
UNHW Roundhill UNH WeeklyPay ETF	22.57%	2.81%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
VHT Vanguard Health Care ETF	1.55%	1.61%	1.53%	1.36%	1.33%	1.14%	1.21%	1.89%	1.38%	1.31%	1.45%	1.22%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VHT and UNHW in my portfolio?

VHT and UNHW have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, VHT or UNHW?

On fees, VHT is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, VHT or UNHW?

VHT is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for UNHW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, VHT or UNHW?

UNHW has the higher dividend yield at 22.57%, compared with 1.55% for VHT.

What is the main difference between VHT and UNHW?

VHT is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while UNHW is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for VHT and 0.99% for UNHW.