PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VHT vs. MRK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VHT vs. MRK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Health Care ETF (VHT) and Merck & Co., Inc. (MRK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VHT achieves a -0.03% return, which is significantly lower than MRK's 15.47% return. Over the past 10 years, VHT has underperformed MRK with an annualized return of 10.14%, while MRK has yielded a comparatively higher 11.81% annualized return.


VHT

1D
1.30%
1M
2.66%
YTD
-0.03%
6M
-0.44%
1Y
19.32%
3Y*
7.09%
5Y*
4.60%
10Y*
10.14%

MRK

1D
3.57%
1M
-1.44%
YTD
15.47%
6M
15.71%
1Y
54.44%
3Y*
4.66%
5Y*
12.89%
10Y*
11.81%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VHT vs. MRK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VHT
Vanguard Health Care ETF
-0.03%15.46%2.66%2.52%-5.60%20.57%18.29%21.87%5.58%23.26%
MRK
Merck & Co., Inc.
15.47%9.79%-6.26%1.01%49.42%1.75%-7.20%22.27%39.95%-1.49%

Correlation

The correlation between VHT and MRK is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.54

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2004

0.63

The correlation between VHT and MRK shifts across timeframes, from 0.52 (5 years) to 0.63 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VHT vs. MRK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VHT
VHT Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
VHT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VHT Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
VHT Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
VHT Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
VHT Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

MRK
MRK Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
MRK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MRK Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
MRK Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
MRK Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
MRK Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VHT vs. MRK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Health Care ETF (VHT) and Merck & Co., Inc. (MRK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VHTMRKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.69

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.92

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.35

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.87

4.81

-2.95

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.59

11.86

-7.27

VHT vs. MRK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VHT Sharpe Ratio is 1.32, which is lower than the MRK Sharpe Ratio of 2.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VHT and MRK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VHT vs. MRK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VHT drawdown since its inception was -39.12%, smaller than the maximum MRK drawdown of -68.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VHT and MRK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VHTMRKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.12%

-68.61%

+29.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.40%

-11.37%

+0.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.91%

-43.44%

+26.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.71%

-43.44%

+25.73%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.85%

-43.44%

+14.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.20%

-3.75%

+0.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.98%

-18.83%

+12.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.22%

4.60%

-0.38%

Volatility

VHT vs. MRK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Health Care ETF (VHT) is 5.02%, while Merck & Co., Inc. (MRK) has a volatility of 10.08%. This indicates that VHT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MRK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VHTMRKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.02%

10.08%

-5.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.49%

18.39%

-7.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.72%

27.30%

-12.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.03%

23.77%

-8.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.95%

22.97%

-6.02%

Dividends

VHT vs. MRK - Dividend Comparison

VHT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.64%, less than MRK's 2.97% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MRK
Merck & Co., Inc.
2.97%3.12%3.14%2.72%2.52%3.41%3.03%2.48%2.60%3.36%3.14%3.43%
VHT
Vanguard Health Care ETF
1.64%1.61%1.53%1.36%1.33%1.14%1.21%1.89%1.38%1.31%1.45%1.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


VHT and MRK have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MRK has higher volatility (10.08%) compared to VHT (5.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VHT dropped -39.12% vs MRK's -68.61%.

MRK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.01 vs 1.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VHT and MRK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer