VHT vs. BTEC
VHT (Vanguard Health Care ETF) and BTEC (Principal Healthcare Innovators Index ETF) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds - VHT tracks the MSCI US Investable Market Health Care 25/50 Index while BTEC tracks the NASDAQ U.S. Health Care Innovators Index. Both are passively managed. VHT charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.42%/yr for BTEC.
Performance
VHT vs. BTEC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
VHT
- 1D
- 0.84%
- 1M
- 1.45%
- YTD
- -4.02%
- 6M
- -4.15%
- 1Y
- 14.34%
- 3Y*
- 6.14%
- 5Y*
- 4.51%
- 10Y*
- 9.26%
BTEC
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VHT vs. BTEC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
VHT Vanguard Health Care ETF | -5.12% |
BTEC Principal Healthcare Innovators Index ETF | 0.00% |
VHT vs. BTEC - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VHT
BTEC
Healthcare
Financial Services
-
Industrials
Technology
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Healthcare
VHT
BTEC
Financial Services
VHT
BTEC
-
Industrials
VHT
BTEC
Technology
VHT
BTEC
-
Basic Materials
VHT
-
BTEC
-
Communication Services
VHT
-
BTEC
-
Consumer Cyclical
VHT
-
BTEC
-
Consumer Defensive
VHT
-
BTEC
-
Energy
VHT
-
BTEC
-
Real Estate
VHT
-
BTEC
-
Utilities
VHT
-
BTEC
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VHT vs. BTEC — Risk / Return Rank
VHT
BTEC
VHT vs. BTEC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Health Care ETF (VHT) and Principal Healthcare Innovators Index ETF (BTEC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VHT | BTEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.38 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.47 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VHT | BTEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.00 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.30 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.55 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.56 | — | — |
Drawdowns
VHT vs. BTEC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VHT drawdown since its inception was -39.12%, which is greater than BTEC's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VHT and BTEC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VHT | BTEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.12% | 0.00% | -39.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.40% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.91% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.71% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -28.85% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.05% | 0.00% | -7.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.99% | 0.00% | -5.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.14% | — | — |
Volatility
VHT vs. BTEC - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VHT | BTEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.08% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.08% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.34% | 0.00% | +14.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.96% | 0.00% | +14.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.94% | 0.00% | +16.94% |
VHT vs. BTEC - Expense Ratio Comparison
VHT has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than BTEC's 0.42% expense ratio.
Dividends
VHT vs. BTEC - Dividend Comparison
VHT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.71%, while BTEC has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BTEC Principal Healthcare Innovators Index ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VHT Vanguard Health Care ETF | 1.71% | 1.61% | 1.53% | 1.36% | 1.33% | 1.14% | 1.21% | 1.89% | 1.38% | 1.31% | 1.45% | 1.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, VHT is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VHT is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.42% for BTEC.
VHT has the higher dividend yield at 1.71%, compared with 0.00% for BTEC.
VHT tracks MSCI US Investable Market Health Care 25/50 Index, while BTEC tracks NASDAQ U.S. Health Care Innovators Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Principal. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for VHT and 0.42% for BTEC.
Find the right allocation for VHT and BTEC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer