VGWLX vs. GBMFX
VGWLX (Vanguard Global Wellington Fund Investor Shares) and GBMFX (GMO Benchmark-Free Allocation Fund) are both Global Allocation funds. Over the past 5 years, VGWLX returned 8.02%/yr vs 8.56%/yr for GBMFX. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VGWLX charges 0.43%/yr vs 0.74%/yr for GBMFX.
Performance
VGWLX vs. GBMFX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with VGWLX having a 9.31% return and GBMFX slightly higher at 9.40%.
VGWLX
- 1D
- 0.30%
- 1M
- -1.08%
- YTD
- 9.31%
- 6M
- 9.07%
- 1Y
- 19.69%
- 3Y*
- 13.67%
- 5Y*
- 8.02%
- 10Y*
- —
GBMFX
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- -1.37%
- YTD
- 9.40%
- 6M
- 9.36%
- 1Y
- 24.47%
- 3Y*
- 15.34%
- 5Y*
- 8.56%
- 10Y*
- 6.87%
VGWLX vs. GBMFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VGWLX Vanguard Global Wellington Fund Investor Shares | 9.31% | 17.34% | 6.13% | 12.40% | -7.22% | 13.36% | 7.40% | 22.05% | -5.13% |
GBMFX GMO Benchmark-Free Allocation Fund | 9.40% | 22.89% | 4.33% | 13.46% | -2.24% | 2.97% | -2.50% | 11.62% | -6.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between VGWLX and GBMFX is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 14, 2018 | 0.78 |
The correlation between VGWLX and GBMFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VGWLX vs. GBMFX — Risk / Return Rank
VGWLX
GBMFX
VGWLX vs. GBMFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Global Wellington Fund Investor Shares (VGWLX) and GMO Benchmark-Free Allocation Fund (GBMFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VGWLX | GBMFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.99 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.44 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.66 | -0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.91 | 4.26 | -1.36 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.70 | 15.96 | -4.26 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VGWLX vs. GBMFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VGWLX drawdown since its inception was -25.28%, which is greater than GBMFX's maximum drawdown of -23.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VGWLX and GBMFX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VGWLX | GBMFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.28% | -23.40% | -1.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.68% | -5.78% | -0.90% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -7.67% | -7.16% | -0.51% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.52% | -13.20% | -4.32% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -23.40% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.53% | -2.30% | +0.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.92% | -3.27% | +0.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.66% | 1.54% | +0.12% |
Volatility
VGWLX vs. GBMFX - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard Global Wellington Fund Investor Shares (VGWLX) has a higher volatility of 2.87% compared to GMO Benchmark-Free Allocation Fund (GBMFX) at 2.48%. This indicates that VGWLX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GBMFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VGWLX | GBMFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.87% | 2.48% | +0.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.78% | 5.86% | +0.92% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.26% | 7.38% | +0.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.23% | 7.35% | +1.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.96% | 7.97% | +2.99% |
VGWLX vs. GBMFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
VGWLX has a 0.43% expense ratio, which is lower than GBMFX's 0.74% expense ratio.
Dividends
VGWLX vs. GBMFX - Dividend Comparison
VGWLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.08%, more than GBMFX's 3.80% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GBMFX GMO Benchmark-Free Allocation Fund | 3.80% | 4.16% | 5.14% | 5.64% | 3.20% | 2.46% | 3.73% | 3.35% | 3.67% | 2.39% | 1.60% | 2.10% |
VGWLX Vanguard Global Wellington Fund Investor Shares | 6.08% | 6.66% | 7.34% | 2.54% | 4.36% | 3.23% | 1.54% | 1.99% | 2.51% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VGWLX and GBMFX have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VGWLX has higher volatility (2.87%) compared to GBMFX (2.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VGWLX dropped -25.28% vs GBMFX's -23.40%.
GBMFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.34 vs 2.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VGWLX and GBMFX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer