VGWLX vs. CVLOX
VGWLX (Vanguard Global Wellington Fund Investor Shares) and CVLOX (Calamos Global Opportunities Fund) are both Global Allocation funds. Over the past 5 years, VGWLX returned 8.02%/yr vs 9.20%/yr for CVLOX. Their correlation of 0.80 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VGWLX charges 0.43%/yr vs 1.22%/yr for CVLOX.
Performance
VGWLX vs. CVLOX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VGWLX achieves a 9.31% return, which is significantly lower than CVLOX's 15.00% return.
VGWLX
- 1D
- 0.30%
- 1M
- -1.08%
- YTD
- 9.31%
- 6M
- 9.07%
- 1Y
- 19.69%
- 3Y*
- 13.67%
- 5Y*
- 8.02%
- 10Y*
- —
CVLOX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -2.91%
- YTD
- 15.00%
- 6M
- 13.85%
- 1Y
- 23.35%
- 3Y*
- 20.25%
- 5Y*
- 9.20%
- 10Y*
- 11.52%
VGWLX vs. CVLOX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VGWLX Vanguard Global Wellington Fund Investor Shares | 9.31% | 17.34% | 6.13% | 12.40% | -7.22% | 13.36% | 7.40% | 22.05% | -5.13% |
CVLOX Calamos Global Opportunities Fund | 15.00% | 15.84% | 23.81% | 13.88% | -22.17% | 15.72% | 31.76% | 18.28% | -12.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between VGWLX and CVLOX is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 14, 2018 | 0.80 |
The correlation between VGWLX and CVLOX shifts across timeframes, from 0.65 (3 years) to 0.80 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VGWLX vs. CVLOX — Risk / Return Rank
VGWLX
CVLOX
VGWLX vs. CVLOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Global Wellington Fund Investor Shares (VGWLX) and Calamos Global Opportunities Fund (CVLOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VGWLX | CVLOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.82 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.23 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.28 | +0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.91 | 2.39 | +0.51 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.70 | 8.65 | +3.05 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VGWLX vs. CVLOX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VGWLX drawdown since its inception was -25.28%, smaller than the maximum CVLOX drawdown of -46.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VGWLX and CVLOX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VGWLX | CVLOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.28% | -46.61% | +21.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.68% | -9.85% | +3.17% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -7.67% | -15.16% | +7.49% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.52% | -29.97% | +12.45% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -29.97% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.53% | -3.54% | +2.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.92% | -8.98% | +6.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.66% | 2.72% | -1.06% |
Volatility
VGWLX vs. CVLOX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard Global Wellington Fund Investor Shares (VGWLX) is 2.87%, while Calamos Global Opportunities Fund (CVLOX) has a volatility of 6.49%. This indicates that VGWLX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CVLOX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VGWLX | CVLOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.87% | 6.49% | -3.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.78% | 13.10% | -6.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.26% | 15.42% | -7.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.23% | 14.72% | -5.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.96% | 14.84% | -3.88% |
VGWLX vs. CVLOX - Expense Ratio Comparison
VGWLX has a 0.43% expense ratio, which is lower than CVLOX's 1.22% expense ratio.
Dividends
VGWLX vs. CVLOX - Dividend Comparison
VGWLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.08%, less than CVLOX's 7.85% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CVLOX Calamos Global Opportunities Fund | 7.85% | 9.10% | 8.15% | 0.61% | 0.00% | 5.71% | 6.11% | 1.28% | 12.65% | 6.04% | 0.68% | 1.28% |
VGWLX Vanguard Global Wellington Fund Investor Shares | 6.08% | 6.66% | 7.34% | 2.54% | 4.36% | 3.23% | 1.54% | 1.99% | 2.51% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VGWLX and CVLOX have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CVLOX has higher volatility (6.49%) compared to VGWLX (2.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VGWLX dropped -25.28% vs CVLOX's -46.61%.
VGWLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.35 vs 1.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VGWLX and CVLOX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer