PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VGWL.DE vs. CBUX.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VGWL.DE vs. CBUX.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Distributing (VGWL.DE) and iShares Global Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CBUX.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VGWL.DE achieves a 12.63% return, which is significantly higher than CBUX.DE's 10.28% return.


VGWL.DE

1D
-0.24%
1M
3.64%
YTD
12.63%
6M
12.78%
1Y
26.26%
3Y*
17.85%
5Y*
12.28%
10Y*

CBUX.DE

1D
-1.34%
1M
-1.37%
YTD
10.28%
6M
9.09%
1Y
13.13%
3Y*
8.47%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VGWL.DE vs. CBUX.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
VGWL.DE
Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Distributing
12.63%9.18%24.40%12.12%
CBUX.DE
iShares Global Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
10.28%0.69%14.63%-1.37%

Correlation

The correlation between VGWL.DE and CBUX.DE is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.37

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 28, 2023

0.39

The correlation between VGWL.DE and CBUX.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.22 (1 year) to 0.39 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VGWL.DE vs. CBUX.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VGWL.DE
VGWL.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
VGWL.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VGWL.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
VGWL.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
VGWL.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
VGWL.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

CBUX.DE
CBUX.DE Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
CBUX.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CBUX.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
CBUX.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
CBUX.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
CBUX.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VGWL.DE vs. CBUX.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Distributing (VGWL.DE) and iShares Global Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CBUX.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VGWL.DECBUX.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.51

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.20

+0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.99

2.91

+1.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.38

6.42

+9.95

VGWL.DE vs. CBUX.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VGWL.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.32, which is higher than the CBUX.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VGWL.DE and CBUX.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VGWL.DECBUX.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.32

1.18

+1.14

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.77

0.60

+0.17

Drawdowns

VGWL.DE vs. CBUX.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VGWL.DE drawdown since its inception was -33.40%, which is greater than CBUX.DE's maximum drawdown of -14.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VGWL.DE and CBUX.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VGWL.DECBUX.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.40%

-14.94%

-18.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.57%

-4.22%

-2.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.04%

-14.94%

-6.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.64%

-3.33%

+2.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.34%

-3.81%

-0.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.61%

1.91%

-0.30%

Volatility

VGWL.DE vs. CBUX.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Distributing (VGWL.DE) is 3.02%, while iShares Global Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CBUX.DE) has a volatility of 3.92%. This indicates that VGWL.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CBUX.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VGWL.DECBUX.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.02%

3.92%

-0.90%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.13%

8.63%

-0.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.29%

10.36%

+0.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.76%

11.93%

+1.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.51%

11.93%

+3.58%

VGWL.DE vs. CBUX.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

VGWL.DE has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is lower than CBUX.DE's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

VGWL.DE vs. CBUX.DE - Dividend Comparison

VGWL.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.24%, while CBUX.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
CBUX.DE
iShares Global Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VGWL.DE
Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Distributing
1.24%1.42%1.48%1.73%2.09%1.43%1.56%1.87%2.26%0.37%

Frequently Asked Questions


VGWL.DE and CBUX.DE have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VGWL.DE is cheaper at 0.22% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VGWL.DE is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for CBUX.DE.

VGWL.DE is categorized as Global Equities, while CBUX.DE is Utilities Equities. VGWL.DE tracks FTSE All-World, while CBUX.DE tracks FTSE Global Core Infrastructure Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for VGWL.DE and 0.65% for CBUX.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VGWL.DE and CBUX.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer