PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VGWL.DE vs. CBUI.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VGWL.DE vs. CBUI.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Distributing (VGWL.DE) and iShares MSCI World Value Factor ESG UCITS ETF USD Acc (CBUI.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VGWL.DE achieves a 12.63% return, which is significantly lower than CBUI.DE's 20.05% return.


VGWL.DE

1D
-0.24%
1M
3.64%
YTD
12.63%
6M
12.78%
1Y
26.26%
3Y*
17.85%
5Y*
12.28%
10Y*

CBUI.DE

1D
0.22%
1M
6.94%
YTD
20.05%
6M
22.25%
1Y
43.77%
3Y*
21.76%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VGWL.DE vs. CBUI.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
VGWL.DE
Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Distributing
12.63%9.18%24.40%18.17%-13.48%3.97%
CBUI.DE
iShares MSCI World Value Factor ESG UCITS ETF USD Acc
20.05%20.98%13.82%15.94%-6.30%6.27%

Correlation

The correlation between VGWL.DE and CBUI.DE is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 1, 2021

0.89

The correlation between VGWL.DE and CBUI.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VGWL.DE vs. CBUI.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VGWL.DE
VGWL.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
VGWL.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VGWL.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
VGWL.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
VGWL.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
VGWL.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

CBUI.DE
CBUI.DE Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
CBUI.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CBUI.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
CBUI.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
CBUI.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
CBUI.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VGWL.DE vs. CBUI.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Distributing (VGWL.DE) and iShares MSCI World Value Factor ESG UCITS ETF USD Acc (CBUI.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VGWL.DECBUI.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.48

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.60

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.99

6.92

-2.93

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.38

26.41

-10.04

VGWL.DE vs. CBUI.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VGWL.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.32, which is lower than the CBUI.DE Sharpe Ratio of 3.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VGWL.DE and CBUI.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VGWL.DECBUI.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.32

3.41

-1.09

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.77

1.05

-0.28

Drawdowns

VGWL.DE vs. CBUI.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VGWL.DE drawdown since its inception was -33.40%, which is greater than CBUI.DE's maximum drawdown of -19.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VGWL.DE and CBUI.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VGWL.DECBUI.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.40%

-19.48%

-13.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.57%

-6.34%

-0.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.04%

-19.48%

-1.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.64%

-0.22%

-0.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.34%

-3.23%

-1.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.61%

1.67%

-0.06%

Volatility

VGWL.DE vs. CBUI.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Distributing (VGWL.DE) is 3.02%, while iShares MSCI World Value Factor ESG UCITS ETF USD Acc (CBUI.DE) has a volatility of 3.73%. This indicates that VGWL.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CBUI.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VGWL.DECBUI.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.02%

3.73%

-0.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.13%

9.76%

-1.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.29%

12.88%

-1.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.76%

14.21%

-0.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.51%

14.21%

+1.30%

VGWL.DE vs. CBUI.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

VGWL.DE has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is lower than CBUI.DE's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

VGWL.DE vs. CBUI.DE - Dividend Comparison

VGWL.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.24%, while CBUI.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
CBUI.DE
iShares MSCI World Value Factor ESG UCITS ETF USD Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VGWL.DE
Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Distributing
1.24%1.42%1.48%1.73%2.09%1.43%1.56%1.87%2.26%0.37%

Frequently Asked Questions


VGWL.DE and CBUI.DE have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VGWL.DE is cheaper at 0.22% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VGWL.DE is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for CBUI.DE.

VGWL.DE tracks FTSE All-World, while CBUI.DE tracks MSCI World Value ESG Reduced Carbon Target Select. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for VGWL.DE and 0.30% for CBUI.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VGWL.DE and CBUI.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer