PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VGWD.DE vs. IAPD.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VGWD.DE vs. IAPD.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Vanguard FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF USD Distributing (VGWD.DE) and iShares Asia Pacific Dividend UCITS (IAPD.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

VGWD.DE is traded in EUR, while IAPD.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the IAPD.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VGWD.DE achieves a 12.49% return, which is significantly lower than IAPD.L's 14.21% return.


VGWD.DE

1D
0.19%
1M
3.35%
YTD
12.49%
6M
14.15%
1Y
25.00%
3Y*
15.87%
5Y*
11.49%
10Y*

IAPD.L

1D
-0.05%
1M
0.58%
YTD
14.21%
6M
14.91%
1Y
38.27%
3Y*
20.24%
5Y*
12.57%
10Y*
8.61%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VGWD.DE vs. IAPD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VGWD.DE
Vanguard FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF USD Distributing
12.49%13.16%15.75%7.29%0.08%27.90%-9.60%25.03%-8.03%1.24%
IAPD.L
iShares Asia Pacific Dividend UCITS
14.21%16.50%14.80%11.30%5.65%13.77%-16.43%19.10%-9.67%1.49%

Correlation

The correlation between VGWD.DE and IAPD.L is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.67

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2017

0.68

The correlation between VGWD.DE and IAPD.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VGWD.DE vs. IAPD.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VGWD.DE
VGWD.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
VGWD.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VGWD.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
VGWD.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
VGWD.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
VGWD.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

IAPD.L
IAPD.L Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
IAPD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IAPD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
IAPD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
IAPD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
IAPD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VGWD.DE vs. IAPD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF USD Distributing (VGWD.DE) and iShares Asia Pacific Dividend UCITS (IAPD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VGWD.DEIAPD.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.83

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.64

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.28

6.48

-2.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.37

23.25

-6.88

VGWD.DE vs. IAPD.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VGWD.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.70, which is comparable to the IAPD.L Sharpe Ratio of 3.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VGWD.DE and IAPD.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VGWD.DEIAPD.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.70

3.53

-0.83

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

0.96

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.64

0.40

+0.24

Drawdowns

VGWD.DE vs. IAPD.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VGWD.DE drawdown since its inception was -34.57%, smaller than the maximum IAPD.L drawdown of -63.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VGWD.DE and IAPD.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VGWD.DEIAPD.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.57%

-63.26%

+28.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.82%

-5.88%

+0.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.86%

-18.47%

+1.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.86%

-18.47%

+1.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.32%

-1.84%

+1.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.05%

-9.52%

+5.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.52%

1.64%

-0.12%

Volatility

VGWD.DE vs. IAPD.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF USD Distributing (VGWD.DE) is 2.33%, while iShares Asia Pacific Dividend UCITS (IAPD.L) has a volatility of 3.39%. This indicates that VGWD.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IAPD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VGWD.DEIAPD.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.33%

3.39%

-1.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.95%

8.26%

-1.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.21%

10.79%

-1.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.52%

13.12%

-1.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.23%

16.07%

-1.84%

VGWD.DE vs. IAPD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

VGWD.DE has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than IAPD.L's 0.59% expense ratio.


Dividends

VGWD.DE vs. IAPD.L - Dividend Comparison

VGWD.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.49%, less than IAPD.L's 4.89% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IAPD.L
iShares Asia Pacific Dividend UCITS
4.89%5.67%6.72%7.29%8.34%7.53%4.77%7.26%7.70%6.15%5.60%8.10%
VGWD.DE
Vanguard FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF USD Distributing
2.49%2.84%3.05%3.39%3.78%3.03%3.08%3.21%3.70%0.58%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


VGWD.DE and IAPD.L have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VGWD.DE is cheaper at 0.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VGWD.DE is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for IAPD.L.

VGWD.DE is categorized as Global Equities, while IAPD.L is Asia Pacific Equities. VGWD.DE tracks FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield index, while IAPD.L tracks MSCI AC Asia Pacific NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for VGWD.DE and 0.59% for IAPD.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VGWD.DE and IAPD.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer