VGVT vs. USFR
VGVT (Vanguard Government Securities Active ETF) and USFR (WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - VGVT is a Intermediate Core Bond fund actively managed by Vanguard, while USFR is a Government Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. Treasury Floating Rate Bond Index. VGVT is actively managed, while USFR is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.08, they often move in opposite directions. VGVT charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for USFR.
Performance
VGVT vs. USFR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VGVT achieves a 0.62% return, which is significantly lower than USFR's 1.82% return.
VGVT
- 1D
- 0.33%
- 1M
- 0.91%
- YTD
- 0.62%
- 6M
- 0.62%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
USFR
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.33%
- YTD
- 1.82%
- 6M
- 1.92%
- 1Y
- 3.99%
- 3Y*
- 4.74%
- 5Y*
- 3.72%
- 10Y*
- 2.43%
VGVT vs. USFR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
VGVT Vanguard Government Securities Active ETF | 0.62% | 3.56% |
USFR WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund | 1.82% | 1.99% |
Correlation
The correlation between VGVT and USFR is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2025 | -0.08 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VGVT vs. USFR — Risk / Return Rank
VGVT
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
USFR
VGVT vs. USFR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Government Securities Active ETF (VGVT) and WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund (USFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VGVT | USFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 13.31 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 201.33 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 779.76 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VGVT vs. USFR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VGVT drawdown since its inception was -2.77%, which is greater than USFR's maximum drawdown of -1.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VGVT and USFR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VGVT | USFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.77% | -1.36% | -1.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -0.02% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -0.06% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -0.18% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -0.80% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.25% | 0.00% | -1.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.73% | -0.15% | -0.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.01% | — |
Volatility
VGVT vs. USFR - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VGVT | USFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.09% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 0.19% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.25% | 0.27% | +2.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.25% | 0.40% | +2.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.25% | 0.78% | +2.47% |
VGVT vs. USFR - Expense Ratio Comparison
VGVT has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than USFR's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VGVT vs. USFR - Dividend Comparison
VGVT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.97%, more than USFR's 3.90% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
USFR WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund | 3.90% | 4.15% | 5.17% | 5.12% | 1.78% | 0.01% | 0.40% | 2.08% | 1.67% | 1.03% | 0.29% |
VGVT Vanguard Government Securities Active ETF | 3.97% | 2.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VGVT and USFR have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VGVT is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VGVT is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for USFR.
VGVT has the higher dividend yield at 3.97%, compared with 3.90% for USFR.
VGVT is categorized as Intermediate Core Bond, while USFR is Government Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for VGVT and 0.15% for USFR.
Find the right allocation for VGVT and USFR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer