VGVT vs. FTGC
VGVT (Vanguard Government Securities Active ETF) and FTGC (First Trust Global Tactical Commodity Strategy Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - VGVT is a Intermediate Core Bond fund actively managed by Vanguard, while FTGC is a Commodities fund actively managed by First Trust. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.26, they often move in opposite directions. VGVT charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for FTGC.
Performance
VGVT vs. FTGC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VGVT achieves a 0.11% return, which is significantly lower than FTGC's 27.15% return.
VGVT
- 1D
- -0.15%
- 1M
- 0.17%
- YTD
- 0.11%
- 6M
- 0.10%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FTGC
- 1D
- -0.44%
- 1M
- -2.63%
- YTD
- 27.15%
- 6M
- 26.06%
- 1Y
- 41.32%
- 3Y*
- 18.13%
- 5Y*
- 13.08%
- 10Y*
- 7.77%
VGVT vs. FTGC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
VGVT Vanguard Government Securities Active ETF | 0.11% | 3.28% |
FTGC First Trust Global Tactical Commodity Strategy Fund | 27.15% | 7.96% |
Correlation
The correlation between VGVT and FTGC is -0.26, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 10, 2025 | -0.26 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VGVT vs. FTGC — Risk / Return Rank
VGVT
FTGC
VGVT vs. FTGC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Government Securities Active ETF (VGVT) and First Trust Global Tactical Commodity Strategy Fund (FTGC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VGVT | FTGC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.66 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.82 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.53 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.17 | 0.24 | +0.93 |
Drawdowns
VGVT vs. FTGC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VGVT drawdown since its inception was -2.77%, smaller than the maximum FTGC drawdown of -59.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VGVT and FTGC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VGVT | FTGC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.77% | -59.47% | +56.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -7.91% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -10.39% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -22.64% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.91% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.76% | -4.65% | +2.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.67% | -27.42% | +26.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.38% | — |
Volatility
VGVT vs. FTGC - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VGVT | FTGC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.50% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 13.15% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.22% | 15.59% | -12.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.22% | 16.00% | -12.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.22% | 14.71% | -11.49% |
VGVT vs. FTGC - Expense Ratio Comparison
VGVT has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than FTGC's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
VGVT vs. FTGC - Dividend Comparison
VGVT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.99%, less than FTGC's 15.08% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTGC First Trust Global Tactical Commodity Strategy Fund | 15.08% | 17.74% | 3.05% | 3.34% | 10.35% | 7.21% | 0.00% | 0.81% | 0.80% | 1.21% |
VGVT Vanguard Government Securities Active ETF | 3.99% | 2.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VGVT and FTGC have a correlation of -0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VGVT is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VGVT is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for FTGC.
FTGC has the higher dividend yield at 15.08%, compared with 3.99% for VGVT.
VGVT is categorized as Intermediate Core Bond, while FTGC is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for VGVT and 0.95% for FTGC.
Find the right allocation for VGVT and FTGC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer