PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VGVF.DE vs. VUAA.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VGVF.DE vs. VUAA.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Vanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF Acc (VGVF.DE) and Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Accumulation (VUAA.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

VGVF.DE is traded in EUR, while VUAA.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the VUAA.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VGVF.DE achieves a 12.58% return, which is significantly higher than VUAA.L's 11.28% return.


VGVF.DE

1D
-0.15%
1M
3.98%
YTD
12.58%
6M
12.87%
1Y
26.34%
3Y*
18.25%
5Y*
13.14%
10Y*

VUAA.L

1D
-0.27%
1M
4.14%
YTD
11.28%
6M
10.75%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VGVF.DE vs. VUAA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between VGVF.DE and VUAA.L is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 9, 2025

0.89

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VGVF.DE vs. VUAA.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VGVF.DE
VGVF.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
VGVF.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VGVF.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
VGVF.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
VGVF.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
VGVF.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

VUAA.L
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VGVF.DE vs. VUAA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF Acc (VGVF.DE) and Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Accumulation (VUAA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VGVF.DEVUAA.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.27

VGVF.DE vs. VUAA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VGVF.DEVUAA.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.34

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.79

2.00

-1.21

Drawdowns

VGVF.DE vs. VUAA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VGVF.DE drawdown since its inception was -33.54%, which is greater than VUAA.L's maximum drawdown of -7.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VGVF.DE and VUAA.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VGVF.DEVUAA.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.54%

-7.08%

-26.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.55%

-0.67%

+0.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.91%

-1.45%

-3.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.53%

2.07%

-0.54%

Volatility

VGVF.DE vs. VUAA.L - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VGVF.DEVUAA.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.22%

12.45%

-1.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.96%

12.45%

+1.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.23%

12.45%

+3.78%

VGVF.DE vs. VUAA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

VGVF.DE has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than VUAA.L's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VGVF.DE vs. VUAA.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither VGVF.DE nor VUAA.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


VGVF.DE and VUAA.L have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VUAA.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VUAA.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for VGVF.DE.

VGVF.DE is categorized as Global Equities, while VUAA.L is S&P 500. VGVF.DE tracks FTSE Developed, while VUAA.L tracks S&P 500 Net Total Return. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for VGVF.DE and 0.07% for VUAA.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VGVF.DE and VUAA.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer