PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VGVF.DE vs. ETLQ.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VGVF.DE vs. ETLQ.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Vanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF Acc (VGVF.DE) and L&G Global Equity UCITS ETF (ETLQ.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VGVF.DE achieves a 12.58% return, which is significantly higher than ETLQ.DE's 10.88% return.


VGVF.DE

1D
-0.15%
1M
3.98%
YTD
12.58%
6M
12.87%
1Y
26.34%
3Y*
18.25%
5Y*
13.14%
10Y*

ETLQ.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
3.89%
YTD
10.88%
6M
10.99%
1Y
23.85%
3Y*
17.73%
5Y*
13.10%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VGVF.DE vs. ETLQ.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
VGVF.DE
Vanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF Acc
12.58%8.99%24.73%20.35%-13.58%31.62%3.27%
ETLQ.DE
L&G Global Equity UCITS ETF
10.88%8.14%26.10%20.83%-13.64%32.63%2.95%

Correlation

The correlation between VGVF.DE and ETLQ.DE is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.99

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 5, 2020

0.97

The correlation between VGVF.DE and ETLQ.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VGVF.DE vs. ETLQ.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VGVF.DE
VGVF.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
VGVF.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VGVF.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
VGVF.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
VGVF.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
VGVF.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

ETLQ.DE
ETLQ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
ETLQ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ETLQ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
ETLQ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
ETLQ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
ETLQ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VGVF.DE vs. ETLQ.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF Acc (VGVF.DE) and L&G Global Equity UCITS ETF (ETLQ.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VGVF.DEETLQ.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.39

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.19

3.56

+0.62

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.27

14.23

+3.04

VGVF.DE vs. ETLQ.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VGVF.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.34, which is comparable to the ETLQ.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VGVF.DE and ETLQ.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VGVF.DEETLQ.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.34

2.13

+0.21

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

0.92

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.79

0.93

-0.14

Drawdowns

VGVF.DE vs. ETLQ.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VGVF.DE drawdown since its inception was -33.54%, roughly equal to the maximum ETLQ.DE drawdown of -33.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VGVF.DE and ETLQ.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VGVF.DEETLQ.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.54%

-33.38%

-0.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.28%

-6.68%

+0.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.17%

-21.58%

+0.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.17%

-21.58%

+0.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.55%

-0.34%

-0.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.91%

-4.33%

-0.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.53%

1.68%

-0.15%

Volatility

VGVF.DE vs. ETLQ.DE - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF Acc (VGVF.DE) has a higher volatility of 2.86% compared to L&G Global Equity UCITS ETF (ETLQ.DE) at 2.68%. This indicates that VGVF.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ETLQ.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VGVF.DEETLQ.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.86%

2.68%

+0.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.02%

7.77%

+0.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.22%

11.18%

+0.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.96%

14.06%

-0.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.23%

15.74%

+0.49%

VGVF.DE vs. ETLQ.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

VGVF.DE has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than ETLQ.DE's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VGVF.DE vs. ETLQ.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither VGVF.DE nor ETLQ.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.99, VGVF.DE and ETLQ.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, ETLQ.DE is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ETLQ.DE is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for VGVF.DE.

VGVF.DE tracks FTSE Developed, while ETLQ.DE tracks Solactive Core Developed Markets Large & Mid Cap. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Legal & General. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for VGVF.DE and 0.10% for ETLQ.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VGVF.DE and ETLQ.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer