PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VGV.TO vs. ZST.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VGV.TO vs. ZST.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Vanguard Canadian Government Bond Index ETF (VGV.TO) and BMO Ultra Short-Term Bond ETF (ZST.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VGV.TO achieves a 1.92% return, which is significantly higher than ZST.TO's 1.18% return.


VGV.TO

1D
0.13%
1M
2.35%
YTD
1.92%
6M
2.24%
1Y
3.98%
3Y*
3.79%
5Y*
0.02%
10Y*

ZST.TO

1D
0.00%
1M
0.29%
YTD
1.18%
6M
0.29%
1Y
1.74%
3Y*
3.87%
5Y*
3.01%
10Y*
2.38%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VGV.TO vs. ZST.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VGV.TO
Vanguard Canadian Government Bond Index ETF
1.92%1.90%3.24%5.61%-12.28%-3.53%7.64%6.40%-0.20%2.91%
ZST.TO
BMO Ultra Short-Term Bond ETF
1.18%2.06%5.21%5.38%1.22%0.24%1.77%2.39%1.99%1.20%

Correlation

The correlation between VGV.TO and ZST.TO is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.27

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 8, 2017

0.21

The correlation between VGV.TO and ZST.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.21 (all time) to 0.33 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VGV.TO vs. ZST.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VGV.TO
VGV.TO Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
VGV.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VGV.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
VGV.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
VGV.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
VGV.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

ZST.TO
ZST.TO Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
ZST.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZST.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZST.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
ZST.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZST.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VGV.TO vs. ZST.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Canadian Government Bond Index ETF (VGV.TO) and BMO Ultra Short-Term Bond ETF (ZST.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VGV.TOZST.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.81

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.58

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.86

-0.71

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.37

1.74

-0.37

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.96

4.67

-1.71

VGV.TO vs. ZST.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VGV.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.80, which is lower than the ZST.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VGV.TO and ZST.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VGV.TO vs. ZST.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VGV.TO drawdown since its inception was -20.77%, which is greater than ZST.TO's maximum drawdown of -3.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VGV.TO and ZST.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VGV.TOZST.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.77%

-3.60%

-17.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.93%

-1.01%

-1.92%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.05%

-1.01%

-5.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.94%

-1.01%

-15.93%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-1.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.20%

0.00%

-6.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.27%

-0.58%

-6.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.35%

0.37%

+0.98%

Volatility

VGV.TO vs. ZST.TO - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Canadian Government Bond Index ETF (VGV.TO) has a higher volatility of 1.42% compared to BMO Ultra Short-Term Bond ETF (ZST.TO) at 0.08%. This indicates that VGV.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZST.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VGV.TOZST.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.42%

0.08%

+1.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.77%

1.05%

+2.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.99%

1.08%

+3.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.00%

0.72%

+6.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.02%

0.71%

+6.31%

VGV.TO vs. ZST.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both VGV.TO and ZST.TO have an expense ratio of 0.17%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VGV.TO vs. ZST.TO - Dividend Comparison

VGV.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.10%, more than ZST.TO's 2.56% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VGV.TO
Vanguard Canadian Government Bond Index ETF
3.10%3.04%2.97%2.78%2.63%2.35%2.28%2.36%2.52%2.26%0.00%0.00%
ZST.TO
BMO Ultra Short-Term Bond ETF
2.56%2.85%4.70%4.84%2.78%2.31%2.68%2.84%3.47%4.09%3.96%3.94%

Frequently Asked Questions


VGV.TO and ZST.TO have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.17% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VGV.TO and ZST.TO have the same expense ratio: 0.17% per year.

They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and BMO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VGV.TO and ZST.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer