PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VGV.TO vs. ZCS.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VGV.TO vs. ZCS.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Vanguard Canadian Government Bond Index ETF (VGV.TO) and BMO Short Corporate Bond Index ETF (ZCS.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VGV.TO achieves a 1.17% return, which is significantly lower than ZCS.TO's 1.53% return.


VGV.TO

1D
-0.05%
1M
-0.74%
6M
0.45%
YTD
1.17%
1Y
4.10%
3Y*
3.58%
5Y*
-0.32%
10Y*

ZCS.TO

1D
0.00%
1M
0.05%
6M
1.09%
YTD
1.53%
1Y
4.08%
3Y*
6.12%
5Y*
2.90%
10Y*
2.80%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VGV.TO vs. ZCS.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VGV.TO
Vanguard Canadian Government Bond Index ETF
1.17%1.90%3.24%5.61%-12.28%-3.53%7.64%6.40%-0.20%2.80%
ZCS.TO
BMO Short Corporate Bond Index ETF
1.53%4.41%7.42%6.67%-4.48%-0.76%6.10%5.01%1.23%0.28%

Correlation

The correlation between VGV.TO and ZCS.TO is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.69

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 8, 2017

0.51

The correlation between VGV.TO and ZCS.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.51 (all time) to 0.70 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VGV.TO vs. ZCS.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VGV.TO
VGV.TO Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
VGV.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VGV.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
VGV.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
VGV.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
VGV.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

ZCS.TO
ZCS.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
ZCS.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZCS.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZCS.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
ZCS.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZCS.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VGV.TO vs. ZCS.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Canadian Government Bond Index ETF (VGV.TO) and BMO Short Corporate Bond Index ETF (ZCS.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VGV.TOZCS.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.50

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.42

-0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.41

2.52

-1.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.18

10.02

-6.84

VGV.TO vs. ZCS.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VGV.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.84, which is lower than the ZCS.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VGV.TO and ZCS.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VGV.TO vs. ZCS.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VGV.TO drawdown since its inception was -20.77%, which is greater than ZCS.TO's maximum drawdown of -13.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VGV.TO and ZCS.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VGV.TOZCS.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.77%

-13.95%

-6.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.93%

-1.63%

-1.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.23%

-1.63%

-3.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.94%

-7.76%

-9.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-13.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.90%

-0.21%

-6.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.27%

-0.89%

-6.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.29%

0.41%

+0.88%

Volatility

VGV.TO vs. ZCS.TO - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Canadian Government Bond Index ETF (VGV.TO) has a higher volatility of 1.37% compared to BMO Short Corporate Bond Index ETF (ZCS.TO) at 0.56%. This indicates that VGV.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZCS.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VGV.TOZCS.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.37%

0.56%

+0.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.87%

1.80%

+2.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.93%

2.09%

+2.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.01%

2.90%

+4.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.00%

4.38%

+2.62%

VGV.TO vs. ZCS.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

VGV.TO has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is higher than ZCS.TO's 0.11% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VGV.TO vs. ZCS.TO - Dividend Comparison

VGV.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.15%, less than ZCS.TO's 3.95% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VGV.TO
Vanguard Canadian Government Bond Index ETF
3.15%3.04%2.97%2.78%2.63%2.35%2.28%2.36%2.52%2.16%0.00%0.00%
ZCS.TO
BMO Short Corporate Bond Index ETF
3.95%3.60%3.27%3.35%3.23%2.99%2.88%2.96%2.88%3.04%3.34%3.53%

Frequently Asked Questions


VGV.TO and ZCS.TO have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ZCS.TO is cheaper at 0.11% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ZCS.TO is cheaper with a 0.11% expense ratio, compared with 0.17% for VGV.TO.

VGV.TO tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate Canadian Government Float Adjusted Bond Index, while ZCS.TO tracks FTSE Canada Short Term Corporate Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and BMO. Their fees differ too: 0.17% for VGV.TO and 0.11% for ZCS.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VGV.TO and ZCS.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer