PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VGV.TO vs. XLB.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VGV.TO vs. XLB.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Vanguard Canadian Government Bond Index ETF (VGV.TO) and iShares Core Canadian Long Term Bond Index ETF (XLB.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VGV.TO achieves a 1.92% return, which is significantly lower than XLB.TO's 2.66% return.


VGV.TO

1D
0.13%
1M
2.35%
YTD
1.92%
6M
2.24%
1Y
3.98%
3Y*
3.79%
5Y*
0.02%
10Y*

XLB.TO

1D
0.21%
1M
3.31%
YTD
2.66%
6M
2.61%
1Y
4.66%
3Y*
2.86%
5Y*
-1.88%
10Y*
0.72%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VGV.TO vs. XLB.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VGV.TO
Vanguard Canadian Government Bond Index ETF
1.92%1.90%3.24%5.61%-12.28%-3.53%7.64%6.40%-0.20%2.91%
XLB.TO
iShares Core Canadian Long Term Bond Index ETF
2.66%-0.76%0.71%9.15%-21.64%-4.59%11.18%12.85%-0.25%7.06%

Correlation

The correlation between VGV.TO and XLB.TO is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 8, 2017

0.69

The correlation between VGV.TO and XLB.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.69 (all time) to 0.89 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VGV.TO vs. XLB.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VGV.TO
VGV.TO Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
VGV.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VGV.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
VGV.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
VGV.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
VGV.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

XLB.TO
XLB.TO Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
XLB.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLB.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLB.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
XLB.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLB.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VGV.TO vs. XLB.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Canadian Government Bond Index ETF (VGV.TO) and iShares Core Canadian Long Term Bond Index ETF (XLB.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VGV.TOXLB.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.27

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.10

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.37

0.96

+0.40

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.96

1.84

+1.12

VGV.TO vs. XLB.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VGV.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.80, which is higher than the XLB.TO Sharpe Ratio of 0.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VGV.TO and XLB.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VGV.TO vs. XLB.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VGV.TO drawdown since its inception was -20.77%, smaller than the maximum XLB.TO drawdown of -32.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VGV.TO and XLB.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VGV.TOXLB.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.77%

-32.97%

+12.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.93%

-4.85%

+1.92%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.05%

-11.66%

+5.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.94%

-27.81%

+10.87%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.20%

-18.51%

+12.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.27%

-7.72%

+0.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.35%

2.53%

-1.18%

Volatility

VGV.TO vs. XLB.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Canadian Government Bond Index ETF (VGV.TO) is 1.42%, while iShares Core Canadian Long Term Bond Index ETF (XLB.TO) has a volatility of 2.53%. This indicates that VGV.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLB.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VGV.TOXLB.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.42%

2.53%

-1.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.77%

5.75%

-1.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.99%

7.98%

-2.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.00%

12.36%

-5.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.02%

11.68%

-4.66%

VGV.TO vs. XLB.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

VGV.TO has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is lower than XLB.TO's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VGV.TO vs. XLB.TO - Dividend Comparison

VGV.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.10%, less than XLB.TO's 4.01% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VGV.TO
Vanguard Canadian Government Bond Index ETF
3.10%3.04%2.97%2.78%2.63%2.35%2.28%2.36%2.52%2.26%0.00%0.00%
XLB.TO
iShares Core Canadian Long Term Bond Index ETF
4.01%4.05%3.82%3.73%3.97%3.03%2.90%3.18%3.56%3.45%3.62%3.64%

Frequently Asked Questions


VGV.TO and XLB.TO have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VGV.TO is cheaper at 0.17% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VGV.TO is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for XLB.TO.

VGV.TO tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate Canadian Government Float Adjusted Bond Index, while XLB.TO tracks Morningstar Can 10+Y Core Bd GR CAD. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.17% for VGV.TO and 0.20% for XLB.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VGV.TO and XLB.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer