PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VGSH vs. VNLA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VGSH vs. VNLA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Short-Term Treasury ETF (VGSH) and Janus Henderson Short Duration Income ETF (VNLA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VGSH achieves a 0.64% return, which is significantly lower than VNLA's 1.63% return.


VGSH

1D
0.07%
1M
0.35%
YTD
0.64%
6M
0.85%
1Y
3.43%
3Y*
4.27%
5Y*
1.87%
10Y*
1.73%

VNLA

1D
0.04%
1M
0.45%
YTD
1.63%
6M
1.87%
1Y
4.81%
3Y*
5.79%
5Y*
3.83%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VGSH vs. VNLA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VGSH
Vanguard Short-Term Treasury ETF
0.64%5.07%4.00%4.31%-3.86%-0.60%3.04%3.52%1.55%0.04%
VNLA
Janus Henderson Short Duration Income ETF
1.63%5.45%6.41%6.09%-0.17%-0.18%3.01%4.43%0.02%2.11%

Correlation

The correlation between VGSH and VNLA is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.60

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2016

0.41

Over the past year, VGSH and VNLA have become more correlated (0.62) than their long-term average of 0.41, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VGSH vs. VNLA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VGSH
VGSH Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
VGSH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VGSH Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
VGSH Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
VGSH Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
VGSH Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

VNLA
VNLA Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
VNLA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VNLA Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
VNLA Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
VNLA Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
VNLA Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VGSH vs. VNLA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Short-Term Treasury ETF (VGSH) and Janus Henderson Short Duration Income ETF (VNLA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VGSHVNLADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-5.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-11.44

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.58

3.67

-2.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.90

11.30

-7.41

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.21

58.12

-42.91

VGSH vs. VNLA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VGSH Sharpe Ratio is 2.71, which is lower than the VNLA Sharpe Ratio of 7.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VGSH and VNLA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VGSH vs. VNLA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VGSH drawdown since its inception was -5.70%, which is greater than VNLA's maximum drawdown of -4.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VGSH and VNLA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VGSHVNLADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.70%

-4.49%

-1.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.88%

-0.43%

-0.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.97%

-0.49%

-0.48%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-5.66%

-1.76%

-3.90%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-5.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.14%

0.00%

-0.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.60%

-0.23%

-0.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.23%

0.08%

+0.15%

Volatility

VGSH vs. VNLA - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Short-Term Treasury ETF (VGSH) has a higher volatility of 0.37% compared to Janus Henderson Short Duration Income ETF (VNLA) at 0.15%. This indicates that VGSH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VNLA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VGSHVNLADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.37%

0.15%

+0.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.90%

0.46%

+0.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.28%

0.63%

+0.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.97%

1.04%

+0.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.58%

1.42%

+0.16%

VGSH vs. VNLA - Expense Ratio Comparison

VGSH has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than VNLA's 0.23% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VGSH vs. VNLA - Dividend Comparison

VGSH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.87%, less than VNLA's 4.77% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VGSH
Vanguard Short-Term Treasury ETF
3.87%4.00%4.18%3.31%1.15%0.66%1.74%2.28%1.79%1.10%0.84%0.69%
VNLA
Janus Henderson Short Duration Income ETF
4.77%4.84%4.97%3.95%4.35%1.67%1.21%3.13%2.43%1.79%0.08%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


VGSH and VNLA have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VGSH has higher volatility (0.37%) compared to VNLA (0.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VGSH dropped -5.70% vs VNLA's -4.49%.

On 5-year performance, VNLA leads with 3.83% vs 1.87% for VGSH. On fees, VGSH is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VNLA has been the lower-risk option at 0.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, VNLA has performed better with a 3.83% return vs 1.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VGSH is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.23% for VNLA.

VNLA has the higher dividend yield at 4.77%, compared with 3.87% for VGSH.

VGSH is categorized as Government Bonds, while VNLA is Ultrashort Bond. VGSH tracks Bloomberg U.S. Treasury 1-3 Year Index, while VNLA tracks FTSE 3-Month U.S. Treasury Bill Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Janus Henderson. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for VGSH and 0.23% for VNLA.

VNLA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (7.71 vs 2.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VGSH and VNLA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer