PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VGRO.TO vs. FEQT.NEO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VGRO.TO vs. FEQT.NEO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Vanguard Growth ETF Portfolio (VGRO.TO) and Fidelity All-in-One Equity ETF Fund (FEQT.NEO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with VGRO.TO having a 10.97% return and FEQT.NEO slightly lower at 10.90%.


VGRO.TO

1D
0.57%
1M
5.12%
YTD
10.97%
6M
9.68%
1Y
25.48%
3Y*
18.25%
5Y*
11.00%
10Y*

FEQT.NEO

1D
0.54%
1M
4.10%
YTD
10.90%
6M
10.77%
1Y
25.84%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VGRO.TO vs. FEQT.NEO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
VGRO.TO
Vanguard Growth ETF Portfolio
10.97%16.11%10.88%
FEQT.NEO
Fidelity All-in-One Equity ETF Fund
10.90%19.42%14.08%

Correlation

The correlation between VGRO.TO and FEQT.NEO is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 14, 2024

0.90

The correlation between VGRO.TO and FEQT.NEO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VGRO.TO vs. FEQT.NEO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VGRO.TO
VGRO.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
VGRO.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VGRO.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
VGRO.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
VGRO.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
VGRO.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

FEQT.NEO
FEQT.NEO Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
FEQT.NEO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FEQT.NEO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
FEQT.NEO Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
FEQT.NEO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
FEQT.NEO Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VGRO.TO vs. FEQT.NEO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Growth ETF Portfolio (VGRO.TO) and Fidelity All-in-One Equity ETF Fund (FEQT.NEO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VGRO.TOFEQT.NEODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.44

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.65

3.12

+0.53

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.92

13.53

+2.38

VGRO.TO vs. FEQT.NEO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VGRO.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.66, which is comparable to the FEQT.NEO Sharpe Ratio of 2.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VGRO.TO and FEQT.NEO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VGRO.TOFEQT.NEODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.66

2.36

+0.30

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.82

1.79

-0.97

Drawdowns

VGRO.TO vs. FEQT.NEO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VGRO.TO drawdown since its inception was -25.36%, which is greater than FEQT.NEO's maximum drawdown of -13.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VGRO.TO and FEQT.NEO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VGRO.TOFEQT.NEODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.36%

-13.24%

-12.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.01%

-8.31%

+1.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.48%

+0.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.41%

-1.45%

-1.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.60%

1.91%

-0.31%

Volatility

VGRO.TO vs. FEQT.NEO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Growth ETF Portfolio (VGRO.TO) is 3.18%, while Fidelity All-in-One Equity ETF Fund (FEQT.NEO) has a volatility of 3.90%. This indicates that VGRO.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FEQT.NEO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VGRO.TOFEQT.NEODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.18%

3.90%

-0.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.88%

8.89%

-1.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.63%

11.02%

-1.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.64%

12.44%

-1.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.53%

12.44%

+0.09%

VGRO.TO vs. FEQT.NEO - Expense Ratio Comparison

VGRO.TO has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than FEQT.NEO's 0.43% expense ratio.


Dividends

VGRO.TO vs. FEQT.NEO - Dividend Comparison

VGRO.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.70%, more than FEQT.NEO's 0.82% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
FEQT.NEO
Fidelity All-in-One Equity ETF Fund
0.82%0.91%0.91%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VGRO.TO
Vanguard Growth ETF Portfolio
1.70%1.88%2.01%2.13%2.14%1.80%1.77%2.17%2.09%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, VGRO.TO and FEQT.NEO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, VGRO.TO is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VGRO.TO is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.43% for FEQT.NEO.

They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for VGRO.TO and 0.43% for FEQT.NEO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VGRO.TO and FEQT.NEO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer