PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VGEJ.DE vs. VWCG.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VGEJ.DE vs. VWCG.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF Distributing (VGEJ.DE) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Europe UCITS ETF (EUR) Accumulating (VWCG.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VGEJ.DE achieves a 50.18% return, which is significantly higher than VWCG.DE's 7.34% return.


VGEJ.DE

1D
-3.08%
1M
7.14%
YTD
50.18%
6M
54.46%
1Y
78.68%
3Y*
26.79%
5Y*
15.69%
10Y*
15.36%

VWCG.DE

1D
0.57%
1M
1.01%
YTD
7.34%
6M
9.93%
1Y
16.18%
3Y*
14.09%
5Y*
9.96%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VGEJ.DE vs. VWCG.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
VGEJ.DE
Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF Distributing
50.18%24.74%3.34%10.27%-4.11%14.06%11.18%9.68%
VWCG.DE
Vanguard FTSE Developed Europe UCITS ETF (EUR) Accumulating
7.34%20.45%8.94%16.07%-9.71%24.74%-2.59%11.39%

Correlation

The correlation between VGEJ.DE and VWCG.DE is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.63

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 5, 2019

0.69

The correlation between VGEJ.DE and VWCG.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.56 (1 year) to 0.69 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VGEJ.DE vs. VWCG.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VGEJ.DE
VGEJ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
VGEJ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VGEJ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
VGEJ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
VGEJ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
VGEJ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

VWCG.DE
VWCG.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
VWCG.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VWCG.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
VWCG.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
VWCG.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
VWCG.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VGEJ.DE vs. VWCG.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF Distributing (VGEJ.DE) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Europe UCITS ETF (EUR) Accumulating (VWCG.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VGEJ.DEVWCG.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.54

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.79

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.69

1.24

+0.46

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.17

1.70

+4.46

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

24.13

6.40

+17.73

VGEJ.DE vs. VWCG.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VGEJ.DE Sharpe Ratio is 3.80, which is higher than the VWCG.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VGEJ.DE and VWCG.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VGEJ.DEVWCG.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.80

1.26

+2.54

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

0.69

+0.24

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.79

0.64

+0.15

Drawdowns

VGEJ.DE vs. VWCG.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VGEJ.DE drawdown since its inception was -36.78%, roughly equal to the maximum VWCG.DE drawdown of -35.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VGEJ.DE and VWCG.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VGEJ.DEVWCG.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.78%

-35.68%

-1.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.94%

-9.58%

-3.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.66%

-16.07%

-3.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.66%

-20.10%

+0.44%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.88%

-1.51%

-2.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.86%

-5.10%

+0.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.31%

2.55%

+0.76%

Volatility

VGEJ.DE vs. VWCG.DE - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF Distributing (VGEJ.DE) has a higher volatility of 10.63% compared to Vanguard FTSE Developed Europe UCITS ETF (EUR) Accumulating (VWCG.DE) at 4.33%. This indicates that VGEJ.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VWCG.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VGEJ.DEVWCG.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.63%

4.33%

+6.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.75%

10.64%

+8.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.99%

12.91%

+8.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.70%

14.29%

+2.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.29%

17.09%

+2.20%

VGEJ.DE vs. VWCG.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

VGEJ.DE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than VWCG.DE's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VGEJ.DE vs. VWCG.DE - Dividend Comparison

VGEJ.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.80%, while VWCG.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VGEJ.DE
Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF Distributing
1.80%2.75%5.36%7.33%7.98%7.49%4.34%6.92%7.83%4.28%3.08%2.78%
VWCG.DE
Vanguard FTSE Developed Europe UCITS ETF (EUR) Accumulating
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


VGEJ.DE and VWCG.DE have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VWCG.DE is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VWCG.DE is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for VGEJ.DE.

VGEJ.DE is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while VWCG.DE is Europe Equities. VGEJ.DE tracks FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan, while VWCG.DE tracks FTSE Developed Europe. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for VGEJ.DE and 0.10% for VWCG.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VGEJ.DE and VWCG.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer