PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VGEJ.DE vs. VAGF.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VGEJ.DE vs. VAGF.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF Distributing (VGEJ.DE) and Vanguard Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (VAGF.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VGEJ.DE achieves a 50.18% return, which is significantly higher than VAGF.DE's -0.68% return.


VGEJ.DE

1D
-3.08%
1M
7.14%
YTD
50.18%
6M
54.46%
1Y
78.68%
3Y*
26.79%
5Y*
15.69%
10Y*
15.36%

VAGF.DE

1D
0.09%
1M
-0.28%
YTD
-0.68%
6M
-0.37%
1Y
1.16%
3Y*
2.04%
5Y*
-1.66%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VGEJ.DE vs. VAGF.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
VGEJ.DE
Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF Distributing
50.18%24.74%3.34%10.27%-4.11%14.06%11.18%7.50%
VAGF.DE
Vanguard Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc
-0.68%3.23%0.82%4.53%-14.84%-2.97%5.07%0.73%

Correlation

The correlation between VGEJ.DE and VAGF.DE is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.26

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.19

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 21, 2019

0.05

Over the past year, VGEJ.DE and VAGF.DE have become more correlated (0.26) than their long-term average of 0.05, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VGEJ.DE vs. VAGF.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VGEJ.DE
VGEJ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
VGEJ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VGEJ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
VGEJ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
VGEJ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
VGEJ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

VAGF.DE
VAGF.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
VAGF.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VAGF.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
VAGF.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
VAGF.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
VAGF.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VGEJ.DE vs. VAGF.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF Distributing (VGEJ.DE) and Vanguard Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (VAGF.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VGEJ.DEVAGF.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.47

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.69

1.06

+0.64

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.17

0.38

+5.78

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

24.13

1.06

+23.07

VGEJ.DE vs. VAGF.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VGEJ.DE Sharpe Ratio is 3.80, which is higher than the VAGF.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VGEJ.DE and VAGF.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VGEJ.DEVAGF.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.80

0.33

+3.47

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

-0.33

+1.26

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.79

-0.17

+0.96

Drawdowns

VGEJ.DE vs. VAGF.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VGEJ.DE drawdown since its inception was -36.78%, which is greater than VAGF.DE's maximum drawdown of -19.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VGEJ.DE and VAGF.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VGEJ.DEVAGF.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.78%

-19.57%

-17.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.94%

-3.11%

-9.83%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.66%

-4.45%

-15.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.66%

-18.79%

-0.87%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.88%

-10.73%

+6.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.86%

-8.99%

+4.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.31%

1.13%

+2.18%

Volatility

VGEJ.DE vs. VAGF.DE - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF Distributing (VGEJ.DE) has a higher volatility of 10.63% compared to Vanguard Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (VAGF.DE) at 1.55%. This indicates that VGEJ.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VAGF.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VGEJ.DEVAGF.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.63%

1.55%

+9.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.75%

2.98%

+15.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.99%

3.63%

+17.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.70%

4.90%

+11.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.29%

4.71%

+14.58%

VGEJ.DE vs. VAGF.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

VGEJ.DE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than VAGF.DE's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VGEJ.DE vs. VAGF.DE - Dividend Comparison

VGEJ.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.80%, while VAGF.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VAGF.DE
Vanguard Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VGEJ.DE
Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF Distributing
1.80%2.75%5.36%7.33%7.98%7.49%4.34%6.92%7.83%4.28%3.08%2.78%

Frequently Asked Questions


VGEJ.DE and VAGF.DE have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VAGF.DE is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VAGF.DE is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for VGEJ.DE.

VGEJ.DE is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while VAGF.DE is Global Bonds. VGEJ.DE tracks FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan, while VAGF.DE tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate Float Adjusted and Scaled (EUR Hedged). Their fees differ too: 0.15% for VGEJ.DE and 0.10% for VAGF.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VGEJ.DE and VAGF.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer